To recognize a female attorney for her professional and personal accomplishments,
the Indianapolis Bar Association’s Women and the Law Division is seeking nominations for the 2010 Antoinette Dakin Leach
Award.
The award nomination form can be found online at www.indybar.org; please submit nominations by July 31, 2010. The recipient
will be honored at a fall luncheon.
In 1990, the Women and the Law Division of the Indianapolis Bar Association established the award to honor outstanding women
in the legal profession. Named after one of the first female lawyers in Indiana, the Antoinette Dakin Leach Award is presented
only when the Division deems a worthy candidate exists.
Antoinette Dakin Leach (1859-1922) gained admittance to the Indiana Bar only after the Indiana Supreme Court overruled a
lower court ruling which stated that a woman was “not a citizen in the sense that she could hold office and practice
law.” Ms. Leach went on to a successful career as an attorney and was a state and national leader in the suffragist
movement.
Nominations should include overviews of the candidate’s professional accomplishments, leadership characteristics, community
involvement, and other personal and professional attributes.
Please take a moment to nominate a woman attorney who has demonstrated some of the attributes of Antoinette Dakin Leach —
by encouraging other women in the pursuit of this honorable profession or blazing a path not taken by others.•














Never heard of remand to another state. How often does that happen?
I highly recommend Deanna and her team of professionals that serve the legal community. Great information and many thanks for sharing.
they are pushing these cases against lawyers too far. thought-crime.
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.