By Julie Armstrong
When was the last time you thought about how you practice law. I don’t mean a personal ethics review or an evaluation
of your business plan. Instead, when was the last time you gave thought to what makes the practice more enjoyable, easier,
or even possible for you. I recently asked a diverse group of Indybar members how they would complete the phrase, “I
wouldn’t practice law without…. The responses I received were as varied as the lawyers who replied.
Some responses were practical:
Steven Peters, partner/litigator, Harrison & Moberly: ...my form file. I have developed this over 30
years. It consists of forms on the computer and in three file cabinets in my office. It has some of my “greatest
(legal) hits” including complaints, answers, motions, briefs, jury instructions, depo outlines and the like. It
also has a list of all my published cases and appellate briefs from over 100 appeals in Indiana and other jurisdictions. It
is a handy reference and is usually my starting point when working on a project. My partners and friends know I have good
forms and it is a quick starting point for their projects. Recently, a partner needed to quickly draft and file a federal
interpleaded complaint with related motions, and I had those in my forms file from a case I handled 10 years ago. A word of
caution about forms: always make sure that they are updated as needed to comply with substantive and procedural rules.
Aaron Freeman, criminal defense attorney, Ladd Thomas Sallee Adams & Freeman: I would not practice law
without my…..cell phone. I have no idea how lawyers used to do it. I use my cell phone for everything.
My calendar, my contacts list, sending e-mail, sending texts, and making calls. My cell phone allows me to stay in touch
with the office, despite where I may be. I could not imagine trying to practice without it.
Joel Nagle, associate/litigator, Tabbert Hahn Earnest & Weddle: I’m sure this isn’t the
most exhilarating response, but I would say West’s Indiana Digest.
Some responses were notes of gratitude:
Vanessa Villegas Lopez, solo practitioner. I wouldn’t practice law without my paralegal Laura.
The day she finishes her PHD I’m in big trouble. A lawyer is only as good as his or her staff. I have been blessed with
an articulate self motivated dedicated paralegal. As a solo practitioner a strong staff is they key to success in this profession.
I have learned that Spa days are always appreciated and no matter what you have to find a way even in this hard economy to
give good raises.
Tom Ruge, partner/immigration & international law, Lewis & Kappes: …being in a firm with
colleagues who have the enormous professional pride our attorneys have, and with support staff who are consistently considerate
of client’s needs and who are tolerant of my many faults and idiosyncrasies.
Tammy Meyer: partner/litigator, MillerMeyer. A good legal secretary and paralegal. the good mentors I have
had; a sense of humor; my best partner ever - Gary Miller.
Jeffrey Abrams. partner/transactional attorney, Benesch/Dann Pecar. I wouldn’t practice law without
a top notch assistant. One assistant who was with me for over 15 years before she retired got mad if I called her anything
but a secretary. Old school way of thinking, but she was outstanding. I have had other great assistants during
my career and they are my partner in providing quality service to our clients.
Jana Matthews, solo practitioner. J. Matthews Legal Group. I wouldn’t practice law without helpful
experienced attorneys who have been/are willing to help solo practitioners like me maneuver through real life lawyering. Anytime
I have a new case there have been attorneys willing to help me get started or serve as confirmation that I am on the right
track. Their willingness to assist has been awesome.
Some responses were surprisingly similar:
Jeffrey Dible, partner/estate planning & tax, Frost Brown Todd: I wouldn’t practice law without
a sense of humor. Not necessarily my sense of humor, which misses as often as it hits. But we lawyers, as trained communicators,
can and do use humor to illustrate points succinctly, to dispel some of the tensions and pretensions in messy situations,
and to show that we don’t take ourselves too seriously. It’s no accident that most of my favorite quotations about
the law are both funny and true, such as Frank Zappa’s “The United States is a nation of laws: badly written and
randomly enforced.”
Melissa Avery, partner/family law, Avery & Cheerva: having great lawyers around me that have a good
sense of humor. Whether it is the other lawyers in my office or my comrades working on bar association projects, it is the
people I work with that make practicing law fun and help me get a much needed laugh when things get stressful. That is what
makes it all worthwhile!
Eric Schmadke, staff attorney, Marion County Prosecutor’s Office: I wouldn’t practice law without
a sense of humor. “Ridentum dicere verum quid vetat?” I agree with Horace when he opined,
“What prevents me from speaking the truth with a smile?” If you let the seriousness of the issues soak so
deep into your soul that you can’t remember the last time you really enjoyed your work – then it’s time
to leave the practice of law. I also wouldn’t practice law without a tie, great colleagues, a jury of my peers,
enigmatic Latin phraseology, or a Westlaw password.
Others were simply touching:
Mark Owens, partner/bankruptcy law, Barnes & Thornburg: I wouldn’t practice law without a supportive
family who understands the pressures and time commitments of the practice of law.
Kathy Osborn, partner/appellate litigator, Baker & Daniels: . . . the support of my sister, mom and
mother-in-law who lovingly and skillfully care for my kids when my husband (also an attorney) and I have to work late or attend
events. My kids get to have the individualized alone time with their aunt and grandmothers I want them to have in any
event. And the icing on the cake is that my sister is an elementary school teacher and media specialist, my mother-in-law
is the librarian at the Indianapolis Hebrew Congregation, and my mom is an avid reader, so there always is an educational
component to their oversight!
John Hoover, partner/litigator, Hoover Hull: I wouldn’t practice law without a picture of my mom to
look at on my desk. She demanded excellence in all endeavors, and she imbued in me manners, hard work, and a batch of
southern colloquialisms, all of which I try to embrace on a daily basis in my law practice.
Take a moment to ponder the phrase, “I wouldn’t practice law without.... It might change your whole day or someone
else’s.•














Judge Roger B. Cosbey is unethical and bias toward African American who seeks justice in Title VII claims. He disrespected and used his authority to attempt to intimidate me into taking an unfair settlement and when I refused he proceeded to get my case dismissed and to deny me my Constitutional and Civil Rights. He disobeying several rules of law; specifically, by ruling on summary judgment motions against the Fed. R. Civ. P., without authority of Judge William C. Lee, without consent of the attorneys, and with conspiracy to commit “fraud on the court,” as he conspired with my former attorney. He proved to me that he is bias, unethical, unfair and unfit to be reappointed. In my opinion, he should be disbarred in 2013, for committing fraud on the court, which would make him ineligible for reinstatement in 2014. See docket 3:07 cv 629 where he rules on dispositive motions, knowing magistrates are not vested with that power (especially without consent), grants the defendant an unconscionable number of extensions, accepts my former attorney request for extension for dispositive motion knowing he was working with the opposition, and unbelievably grants the defendant another extension after he requested an extension after he missed the deadline. I know another attorney filed charges against him for bias in race discrimination case(s). I know what he did in my case before he voluntarily recused himself, I just do not know how many other innocent people have been stripped of their rights because of him. I say shame on him and no more of the same.
they are pushing these cases against lawyers too far. thought-crime.
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.