ILNews

IBA: Indianapolis Bar Foundation Awards Academic and Educational Scholarships

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indianapolis Bar Foundation recently awarded seven scholarships to both law students and to individuals preparing to take the Indiana Bar Exam in summer 2013.

Three academic scholarships were presented to assist students during their law school career. The following students received academic scholarships in 2013:

Rosalie F. Felton Scholarship: Michelle Langdon, student at the Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law

Hon. William E. Steckler Scholarship: Kelli Liggett, student at the Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law

Neil E. Shook Scholarship: Roya Parter, student at the Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law

In addition to these academic scholarships, four individuals received educational scholarships for the IndyBar’s summer 2013 Indy Bar Review course. IndyBar Review, the only bar exam preparation course offered by a bar association in the country, will prepare these individuals to sit for the Indiana Bar Exam in July 2013. Individuals receiving educational scholarships in 2013 are:

Christopher Gines

Andrea Kochert

Brandon Tate

Adam Willfond

The next scholarships to be awarded will be educational scholarships to be applied to the winter 2013 IndyBar Review course. Visit www.indybar.org to access application materials, which are due Nov. 1.

The Indianapolis Bar Foundation, the charitable arm of the Indianapolis Bar Association, is a community-focused leader of the local legal profession. The foundation’s ongoing grants and programs are maintained solely through the generosity and energy of its directors, fellows and donors. The assistance provided to students through IBF funded scholarships is a key component in the organization’s mission to advance justice and lead positive change in Indianapolis through philanthropy, education and service.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Don't we have bigger issues to concern ourselves with?

  2. Anyone who takes the time to study disciplinary and bar admission cases in Indiana ... much of which is, as a matter of course and by intent, off the record, would have a very difficult time drawing lines that did not take into account things which are not supposed to matter, such as affiliations, associations, associates and the like. Justice Hoosier style is a far departure than what issues in most other parts of North America. (More like Central America, in fact.) See, e.g., http://www.theindianalawyer.com/indiana-attorney-illegally-practicing-in-florida-suspended-for-18-months/PARAMS/article/42200 When while the Indiana court system end the cruel practice of killing prophets of due process and those advocating for blind justice?

  3. Wouldn't this call for an investigation of Government corruption? Chief Justice Loretta Rush, wrote that the case warranted the high court’s review because the method the Indiana Court of Appeals used to reach its decision was “a significant departure from the law.” Specifically, David wrote that the appellate panel ruled after reweighing of the evidence, which is NOT permissible at the appellate level. **But yet, they look the other way while an innocent child was taken by a loving mother who did nothing wrong"

  4. Different rules for different folks....

  5. I would strongly suggest anyone seeking mediation check the experience of the mediator. There are retired judges who decide to become mediators. Their training and experience is in making rulings which is not the point of mediation.

ADVERTISEMENT