ILNews

IBA: IndyBar Launches Online CLE

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

iba-cleIn an age where nearly every task can be completed on the Web, it’s no surprise that online education is gaining in popularity for busy professionals across the globe. Recognizing the need to provide quality legal education in the online arena as well as in the live setting, the IndyBar is proud to introduce IndyBar Online CLE. Now the same quality educational programming from the IndyBar can be accessed anytime, anywhere, with just a computer and Internet connection.

Featuring a course catalog of more than 70 courses representing over 15 areas of substantive law, the IndyBar’s convenient one-hour programs are perfect for squeezing into your busy schedule, whether at the office, at home or anywhere in between. Plus, IndyBar Online CLE is competitively priced, making it an ideal choice to complement the bar’s live CLE offerings.

What is Online CLE? Online CLE is a catalog of IndyBar programs previously offered in a live format within the past two years. All programs meet distance education credit standards.

Why is the IndyBar offering Online CLE? The answer is two-fold. First, the CLE Commission allows attorneys to receive up to six hours of credit per three year educational period in an online format. Second, the bar understands your time is valuable. If you are unable to attend the live session, this format allows you access to the information at a time more convenient for you.

How do I register for IndyBar Online CLE programs? This registration is comparable to the process for regular IndyBar programs. Simply review and select programs for your shopping cart. Go to your shopping cart to make payment arrangements.

Once the payment process is complete, an email confirming your registration will be sent to the email address on file with the IndyBar. Follow the link within the email to access your Online CLE course.

How long do I have access to the purchased Online CLE program? Your purchase provides up to a 30-day access from the time of purchase to view and complete the educational requirements of the Indiana Commission for Continuing Legal Education. Failure to complete the online course within 30 days will require you to re-enroll and purchase again in order to view and complete the education program.

How do I report my Online CLE credit? Once you review the program in its entirety, the IndyBar will report all credits earned within 10 days of completion directly to the Indiana Commission for Continuing Legal Education.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Indiana's seatbelt law is not punishable as a crime. It is an infraction. Apparently some of our Circuit judges have deemed settled law inapplicable if it fails to fit their litmus test of political correctness. Extrapolating to redefine terms of behavior in a violation of immigration law to the entire body of criminal law leaves a smorgasbord of opportunity for judicial mischief.

  2. I wonder if $10 diversions for failure to wear seat belts are considered moral turpitude in federal immigration law like they are under Indiana law? Anyone know?

  3. What a fine article, thank you! I can testify firsthand and by detailed legal reports (at end of this note) as to the dire consequences of rejecting this truth from the fine article above: "The inclusion and expansion of this right [to jury] in Indiana’s Constitution is a clear reflection of our state’s intention to emphasize the importance of every Hoosier’s right to make their case in front of a jury of their peers." Over $20? Every Hoosier? Well then how about when your very vocation is on the line? How about instead of a jury of peers, one faces a bevy of political appointees, mini-czars, who care less about due process of the law than the real czars did? Instead of trial by jury, trial by ideological ordeal run by Orwellian agents? Well that is built into more than a few administrative law committees of the Ind S.Ct., and it is now being weaponized, as is revealed in articles posted at this ezine, to root out post moderns heresies like refusal to stand and pledge allegiance to all things politically correct. My career was burned at the stake for not so saluting, but I think I was just one of the early logs. Due, at least in part, to the removal of the jury from bar admission and bar discipline cases, many more fires will soon be lit. Perhaps one awaits you, dear heretic? Oh, at that Ind. article 12 plank about a remedy at law for every damage done ... ah, well, the founders evidently meant only for those damages done not by the government itself, rabid statists that they were. (Yes, that was sarcasm.) My written reports available here: Denied petition for cert (this time around): http://tinyurl.com/zdmawmw Denied petition for cert (from the 2009 denial and five year banishment): http://tinyurl.com/zcypybh Related, not written by me: Amicus brief: http://tinyurl.com/hvh7qgp

  4. Justice has finally been served. So glad that Dr. Ley can finally sleep peacefully at night knowing the truth has finally come to the surface.

  5. While this right is guaranteed by our Constitution, it has in recent years been hampered by insurance companies, i.e.; the practice of the plaintiff's own insurance company intervening in an action and filing a lien against any proceeds paid to their insured. In essence, causing an additional financial hurdle for a plaintiff to overcome at trial in terms of overall award. In a very real sense an injured party in exercise of their right to trial by jury may be the only party in a cause that would end up with zero compensation.

ADVERTISEMENT