ILNews

IBA: Insurance Practices in Commercial Real Estate Loans

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

By David Duncan, Bose McKinney & Evans

Requesting appropriate insurance coverages and obtaining certificates of insurance verifying such coverages are in place may be one of the least understood, and thereby, among the most overlooked issues in commercial real estate loan transactions.

In a loan involving commercial real estate, the lender should require the borrower to maintain standard all risk hazard insurance insuring the property against losses from fire, lighting, explosion, windstorm or hail, smoke, impact of vehicles and aircraft, and malicious mischief. If loan proceeds will fund construction activities, the lender should also require the borrower to maintain builder’s risk insurance which affords coverage for similar losses while the insured property is under construction. If the project includes leased real estate, the lender should require the borrower to maintain a loss of rental value endorsement to the property insurance. Otherwise, the lender should require the borrower to maintain a business interruption endorsement. Finally, the lender should also require the borrower to maintain commercial general liability insurance to insure against claims for bodily injury, death, or property damage.

The lender, and its successors and assigns, should be added as a mortgagee and loss payee on the borrower’s commercial property insurance policy. Likewise, the lender should be added as an additional insured on the borrower’s commercial general liability insurance policy. The lender should require that the policy of commercial property insurance contain a standard mortgagee clause which defines the lender as an insured mortgage holder, provides that the lender’s right to the proceeds of insurance will not be invalidated by any act or neglect of the property owner/mortgagor and requires the insurer to provide notice of cancellation to the lender. If the lender is named as a mortgagee under a standard mortgagee clause they are afforded independent contract rights with the insurer, whereas, being named only as a loss payee or additional insured affords no independent contract rights and subjects the lender to the same defenses the insurer would have against the property owner.

Assuming the insurance policies are not available for review prior to closing, obtaining the proper form of certificate of insurance should be given adequate consideration. The insurance industry subscribes to the form certificates of insurance published by ACORD. ACORD 24 and 28 are standard forms to evidence property insurance. ACORD 25 is the standard certificate of insurance for commercial general liability insurance.

ACORD 75 binds coverage for the policies referenced.

Each of ACORD 24, 25 and 28 typically contain language unfavorable to lenders and:

are issued as a matter of information only and confers no rights upon the certificate holder;

do not constitute a contract between the issuing insurer, producer and certificate holder;

are subject to all the terms, exclusions and conditions of the insurance policy;

policy limits may have been reduced by claims; and

notice of cancellation will be delivered in accordance with the policy provisions.

ACORD 75 is issued subject to the terms, conditions and limitations of the policies in current use by the underwriting company, but is an insurance binder for the limited period of time stated therein. Accordingly, ACORD 75 is the only form lenders should rely upon for evidence of binding coverage.

In the past, attorneys have accepted ACORD certificates of insurance marked-up by the issuing agent with handwritten edits. In April 2009, the Indiana Department of Insurance (IDOI) issued Bulletin 170 addressing this practice. In Bulletin 170, the IDOI stated that “certificates generally serve only as an informational summary of insurance in lieu of an actual copy of an insurance policy and should not be used to amend, extend, or alter policy terms . . . .” and made reference to the language contained in the ACORD forms as acceptable to meet the requirements of the IDOI “so long as the forms are not altered to inappropriately modify terms of the policy.”

It is the best practice to obtain a copy of the policy or a policy binder prior to closing on a commercial real estate loan transaction as certificates/evidences of insurance may not bind coverage. Likewise, inaccuracies in the certificates/evidences of insurance and/or reliance upon modifications by the issuing agent may not bind the underwriting insurance company, and may leave the lender with merely a claim against the issuing agent’s errors and omissions insurance. Depending on the limits of such errors and omissions coverage, this could expose the lender to unintended financial risks.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I was wondering about the 6 million put aside for common attorney fees?does that mean that if you are a plaintiff your attorney fees will be partially covered?

  2. My situation was hopeless me and my husband was on the verge of divorce. I was in a awful state and felt that I was not able to cope with life any longer. I found out about this great spell caster drlawrencespelltemple@hotmail.com and tried him. Well, he did return and now we are doing well again, more than ever before. Thank you so much Drlawrencespelltemple@hotmail.comi will forever be grateful to you Drlawrencespelltemple@hotmail.com

  3. I expressed my thought in the title, long as it was. I am shocked that there is ever immunity from accountability for ANY Government agency. That appears to violate every principle in the US Constitution, which exists to limit Government power and to ensure Government accountability. I don't know how many cases of legitimate child abuse exist, but in the few cases in which I knew the people involved, in every example an anonymous caller used DCS as their personal weapon to strike at innocent people over trivial disagreements that had no connection with any facts. Given that the system is vulnerable to abuse, and given the extreme harm any action by DCS causes to families, I would assume any degree of failure to comply with the smallest infraction of personal rights would result in mandatory review. Even one day of parent-child separation in the absence of reasonable cause for a felony arrest should result in severe penalties to those involved in the action. It appears to me, that like all bureaucracies, DCS is prone to interpret every case as legitimate. This is not an accusation against DCS. It is a statement about the nature of bureaucracies, and the need for ADDED scrutiny of all bureaucratic actions. Frankly, I question the constitutionality of bureaucracies in general, because their power is delegated, and therefore unaccountable. No Government action can be unaccountable if we want to avoid its eventual degeneration into irrelevance and lawlessness, and the law of the jungle. Our Constitution is the source of all Government power, and it is the contract that legitimizes all Government power. To the extent that its various protections against intrusion are set aside, so is the power afforded by that contract. Eventually overstepping the limits of power eliminates that power, as a law of nature. Even total tyranny eventually crumbles to nothing.

  4. Being dedicated to a genre keeps it alive until the masses catch up to the "trend." Kent and Bill are keepin' it LIVE!! Thank you gentlemen..you know your JAZZ.

  5. Hemp has very little THC which is needed to kill cancer cells! Growing cannabis plants for THC inside a hemp field will not work...where is the fear? From not really knowing about Cannabis and Hemp or just not listening to the people teaching you through testimonies and packets of info over the last few years! Wake up Hoosier law makers!

ADVERTISEMENT