ILNews

IBA: Insurance Practices in Commercial Real Estate Loans

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

By David Duncan, Bose McKinney & Evans

Requesting appropriate insurance coverages and obtaining certificates of insurance verifying such coverages are in place may be one of the least understood, and thereby, among the most overlooked issues in commercial real estate loan transactions.

In a loan involving commercial real estate, the lender should require the borrower to maintain standard all risk hazard insurance insuring the property against losses from fire, lighting, explosion, windstorm or hail, smoke, impact of vehicles and aircraft, and malicious mischief. If loan proceeds will fund construction activities, the lender should also require the borrower to maintain builder’s risk insurance which affords coverage for similar losses while the insured property is under construction. If the project includes leased real estate, the lender should require the borrower to maintain a loss of rental value endorsement to the property insurance. Otherwise, the lender should require the borrower to maintain a business interruption endorsement. Finally, the lender should also require the borrower to maintain commercial general liability insurance to insure against claims for bodily injury, death, or property damage.

The lender, and its successors and assigns, should be added as a mortgagee and loss payee on the borrower’s commercial property insurance policy. Likewise, the lender should be added as an additional insured on the borrower’s commercial general liability insurance policy. The lender should require that the policy of commercial property insurance contain a standard mortgagee clause which defines the lender as an insured mortgage holder, provides that the lender’s right to the proceeds of insurance will not be invalidated by any act or neglect of the property owner/mortgagor and requires the insurer to provide notice of cancellation to the lender. If the lender is named as a mortgagee under a standard mortgagee clause they are afforded independent contract rights with the insurer, whereas, being named only as a loss payee or additional insured affords no independent contract rights and subjects the lender to the same defenses the insurer would have against the property owner.

Assuming the insurance policies are not available for review prior to closing, obtaining the proper form of certificate of insurance should be given adequate consideration. The insurance industry subscribes to the form certificates of insurance published by ACORD. ACORD 24 and 28 are standard forms to evidence property insurance. ACORD 25 is the standard certificate of insurance for commercial general liability insurance.

ACORD 75 binds coverage for the policies referenced.

Each of ACORD 24, 25 and 28 typically contain language unfavorable to lenders and:

are issued as a matter of information only and confers no rights upon the certificate holder;

do not constitute a contract between the issuing insurer, producer and certificate holder;

are subject to all the terms, exclusions and conditions of the insurance policy;

policy limits may have been reduced by claims; and

notice of cancellation will be delivered in accordance with the policy provisions.

ACORD 75 is issued subject to the terms, conditions and limitations of the policies in current use by the underwriting company, but is an insurance binder for the limited period of time stated therein. Accordingly, ACORD 75 is the only form lenders should rely upon for evidence of binding coverage.

In the past, attorneys have accepted ACORD certificates of insurance marked-up by the issuing agent with handwritten edits. In April 2009, the Indiana Department of Insurance (IDOI) issued Bulletin 170 addressing this practice. In Bulletin 170, the IDOI stated that “certificates generally serve only as an informational summary of insurance in lieu of an actual copy of an insurance policy and should not be used to amend, extend, or alter policy terms . . . .” and made reference to the language contained in the ACORD forms as acceptable to meet the requirements of the IDOI “so long as the forms are not altered to inappropriately modify terms of the policy.”

It is the best practice to obtain a copy of the policy or a policy binder prior to closing on a commercial real estate loan transaction as certificates/evidences of insurance may not bind coverage. Likewise, inaccuracies in the certificates/evidences of insurance and/or reliance upon modifications by the issuing agent may not bind the underwriting insurance company, and may leave the lender with merely a claim against the issuing agent’s errors and omissions insurance. Depending on the limits of such errors and omissions coverage, this could expose the lender to unintended financial risks.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Call it unauthorized law if you must, a regulatory wrong, but it was fraud and theft well beyond that, a seeming crime! "In three specific cases, the hearing officer found that Westerfield did little to no work for her clients but only issued a partial refund or no refund at all." That is theft by deception, folks. "In its decision to suspend Westerfield, the Supreme Court noted that she already had a long disciplinary history dating back to 1996 and had previously been suspended in 2004 and indefinitely suspended in 2005. She was reinstated in 2009 after finally giving the commission a response to the grievance for which she was suspended in 2004." WOW -- was the Indiana Supreme Court complicit in her fraud? Talk about being on notice of a real bad actor .... "Further, the justices noted that during her testimony, Westerfield was “disingenuous and evasive” about her relationship with Tope and attempted to distance herself from him. They also wrote that other aggravating factors existed in Westerfield’s case, such as her lack of remorse." WOW, and yet she only got 18 months on the bench, and if she shows up and cries for them in a year and a half, and pays money to JLAP for group therapy ... back in to ride roughshod over hapless clients (or are they "marks") once again! Aint Hoosier lawyering a great money making adventure!!! Just live for the bucks, even if filthy lucre, and come out a-ok. ME on the other hand??? Lifetime banishment for blowing the whistle on unconstitutional governance. Yes, had I ripped off clients or had ANY disciplinary history for doing that I would have fared better, most likely, as that it would have revealed me motivated by Mammon and not Faith. Check it out if you doubt my reading of this, compare and contrast the above 18 months with my lifetime banishment from court, see appendix for Bar Examiners report which the ISC adopted without substantive review: https://www.scribd.com/doc/299040839/2016Petitionforcert-to-SCOTUS

  2. Wow, over a quarter million dollars? That is a a lot of commissary money! Over what time frame? Years I would guess. Anyone ever try to blow the whistle? Probably not, since most Hoosiers who take notice of such things realize that Hoosier whistleblowers are almost always pilloried. If someone did blow the whistle, they were likely fired. The persecution of whistleblowers is a sure sign of far too much government corruption. Details of my own personal experience at the top of Hoosier governance available upon request ... maybe a "fake news" media outlet will have the courage to tell the stories of Hoosier whistleblowers that the "real" Hoosier media (cough) will not deign to touch. (They are part of the problem.)

  3. So if I am reading it right, only if and when African American college students agree to receive checks labeling them as "Negroes" do they receive aid from the UNCF or the Quaker's Educational Fund? In other words, to borrow from the Indiana Appellate Court, "the [nonprofit] supposed to be [their] advocate, refers to [students] in a racially offensive manner. While there is no evidence that [the nonprofits] intended harm to [African American students], the harm was nonetheless inflicted. [Black students are] presented to [academia and future employers] in a racially offensive manner. For these reasons, [such] performance [is] deficient and also prejudice[ial]." Maybe even DEPLORABLE???

  4. I'm the poor soul who spent over 10 years in prison with many many other prisoners trying to kill me for being charged with a sex offense THAT I DID NOT COMMIT i was in jail for a battery charge for helping a friend leave a boyfriend who beat her I've been saying for over 28 years that i did not and would never hurt a child like that mine or anybody's child but NOBODY wants to believe that i might not be guilty of this horrible crime or think that when i say that ALL the paperwork concerning my conviction has strangely DISAPPEARED or even when the long beach judge re-sentenced me over 14 months on a already filed plea bargain out of another districts court then had it filed under a fake name so i could not find while trying to fight my conviction on appeal in a nut shell people are ALWAYS quick to believe the worst about some one well I DID NOT HURT ANY CHILD EVER IN MY LIFE AND HAVE SAID THIS FOR ALMOST 30 YEARS please if anybody can me get some kind of justice it would be greatly appreciated respectfully written wrongly accused Brian Valenti

  5. A high ranking Indiana supreme Court operative caught red handed leading a group using the uber offensive N word! She must denounce or be denounced! (Or not since she is an insider ... rules do not apply to them). Evidence here: http://m.indianacompanies.us/friends-educational-fund-for-negroes.364110.company.v2#top_info

ADVERTISEMENT