ILNews

IBA: Insurance Practices in Commercial Real Estate Loans

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

By David Duncan, Bose McKinney & Evans

Requesting appropriate insurance coverages and obtaining certificates of insurance verifying such coverages are in place may be one of the least understood, and thereby, among the most overlooked issues in commercial real estate loan transactions.

In a loan involving commercial real estate, the lender should require the borrower to maintain standard all risk hazard insurance insuring the property against losses from fire, lighting, explosion, windstorm or hail, smoke, impact of vehicles and aircraft, and malicious mischief. If loan proceeds will fund construction activities, the lender should also require the borrower to maintain builder’s risk insurance which affords coverage for similar losses while the insured property is under construction. If the project includes leased real estate, the lender should require the borrower to maintain a loss of rental value endorsement to the property insurance. Otherwise, the lender should require the borrower to maintain a business interruption endorsement. Finally, the lender should also require the borrower to maintain commercial general liability insurance to insure against claims for bodily injury, death, or property damage.

The lender, and its successors and assigns, should be added as a mortgagee and loss payee on the borrower’s commercial property insurance policy. Likewise, the lender should be added as an additional insured on the borrower’s commercial general liability insurance policy. The lender should require that the policy of commercial property insurance contain a standard mortgagee clause which defines the lender as an insured mortgage holder, provides that the lender’s right to the proceeds of insurance will not be invalidated by any act or neglect of the property owner/mortgagor and requires the insurer to provide notice of cancellation to the lender. If the lender is named as a mortgagee under a standard mortgagee clause they are afforded independent contract rights with the insurer, whereas, being named only as a loss payee or additional insured affords no independent contract rights and subjects the lender to the same defenses the insurer would have against the property owner.

Assuming the insurance policies are not available for review prior to closing, obtaining the proper form of certificate of insurance should be given adequate consideration. The insurance industry subscribes to the form certificates of insurance published by ACORD. ACORD 24 and 28 are standard forms to evidence property insurance. ACORD 25 is the standard certificate of insurance for commercial general liability insurance.

ACORD 75 binds coverage for the policies referenced.

Each of ACORD 24, 25 and 28 typically contain language unfavorable to lenders and:

are issued as a matter of information only and confers no rights upon the certificate holder;

do not constitute a contract between the issuing insurer, producer and certificate holder;

are subject to all the terms, exclusions and conditions of the insurance policy;

policy limits may have been reduced by claims; and

notice of cancellation will be delivered in accordance with the policy provisions.

ACORD 75 is issued subject to the terms, conditions and limitations of the policies in current use by the underwriting company, but is an insurance binder for the limited period of time stated therein. Accordingly, ACORD 75 is the only form lenders should rely upon for evidence of binding coverage.

In the past, attorneys have accepted ACORD certificates of insurance marked-up by the issuing agent with handwritten edits. In April 2009, the Indiana Department of Insurance (IDOI) issued Bulletin 170 addressing this practice. In Bulletin 170, the IDOI stated that “certificates generally serve only as an informational summary of insurance in lieu of an actual copy of an insurance policy and should not be used to amend, extend, or alter policy terms . . . .” and made reference to the language contained in the ACORD forms as acceptable to meet the requirements of the IDOI “so long as the forms are not altered to inappropriately modify terms of the policy.”

It is the best practice to obtain a copy of the policy or a policy binder prior to closing on a commercial real estate loan transaction as certificates/evidences of insurance may not bind coverage. Likewise, inaccuracies in the certificates/evidences of insurance and/or reliance upon modifications by the issuing agent may not bind the underwriting insurance company, and may leave the lender with merely a claim against the issuing agent’s errors and omissions insurance. Depending on the limits of such errors and omissions coverage, this could expose the lender to unintended financial risks.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. It appears the police and prosecutors are allowed to change the rules halfway through the game to suit themselves. I am surprised that the congress has not yet eliminated the right to a trial in cases involving any type of forensic evidence. That would suit their foolish law and order police state views. I say we eliminate the statute of limitations for crimes committed by members of congress and other government employees. Of course they would never do that. They are all corrupt cowards!!!

  2. Poor Judge Brown probably thought that by slavishly serving the godz of the age her violations of 18th century concepts like due process and the rule of law would be overlooked. Mayhaps she was merely a Judge ahead of her time?

  3. in a lawyer discipline case Judge Brown, now removed, was presiding over a hearing about a lawyer accused of the supposedly heinous ethical violation of saying the words "Illegal immigrant." (IN re Barker) http://www.in.gov/judiciary/files/order-discipline-2013-55S00-1008-DI-429.pdf .... I wonder if when we compare the egregious violations of due process by Judge Brown, to her chiding of another lawyer for politically incorrectness, if there are any conclusions to be drawn about what kind of person, what kind of judge, what kind of apparatchik, is busy implementing the agenda of political correctness and making off-limits legit advocacy about an adverse party in a suit whose illegal alien status is relevant? I am just asking the question, the reader can make own conclsuion. Oh wait-- did I use the wrong adjective-- let me rephrase that, um undocumented alien?

  4. of course the bigger questions of whether or not the people want to pay for ANY bussing is off limits, due to the Supreme Court protecting the people from DEMOCRACY. Several decades hence from desegregation and bussing plans and we STILL need to be taking all this taxpayer money to combat mostly-imagined "discrimination" in the most obviously failed social program of the postwar period.

  5. You can put your photos anywhere you like... When someone steals it they know it doesn't belong to them. And, a man getting a divorce is automatically not a nice guy...? That's ridiculous. Since when is need of money a conflict of interest? That would mean that no one should have a job unless they are already financially solvent without a job... A photographer is also under no obligation to use a watermark (again, people know when a photo doesn't belong to them) or provide contact information. Hey, he didn't make it easy for me to pay him so I'll just take it! Well heck, might as well walk out of the grocery store with a cart full of food because the lines are too long and you don't find that convenient. "Only in Indiana." Oh, now you're passing judgement on an entire state... What state do you live in? I need to characterize everyone in your state as ignorant and opinionated. And the final bit of ignorance; assuming a photo anyone would want is lucky and then how much does your camera have to cost to make it a good photo, in your obviously relevant opinion?

ADVERTISEMENT