The days of being chained to a desk truly are ending for most lawyers. The American Bar Association recently announced that
seventy-one percent of its members surveyed say they telecommute, and they are working in a variety of places. Lawyers are
telecommuting at home (88 percent), in hotels (32 percent), in others’ offices (21 percent), in public places such as
libraries or courthouses (14 percent), and in coffee shops and cafes (12 percent).
Less than 1 percent spend all of their time working away from their main office, however. The bulk of the respondents—46
percent—spend between 10 percent and 24 percent of their time telecommuting.
The ABA Legal Technology Resource Center surveyed association members on six different technology subjects in January through
May of this year. A total of 859 responded to the “mobile lawyers” subject.
When it comes to technology, lawyers don’t leave the office without it. Ninety-five percent use computers away from
the office, 89 percent use laptops, and 79 percent use BlackBerrys or smartphones.
A different portion of the survey, which had 806 respondents, found online research is among the work being done away from
the office. Thirty-five percent of the respondents said they regularly conduct legal research at home, up from 29 percent
in the 2009 survey. Five percent say they do legal research while in transit or traveling.•














Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.
Forcing a defendant to wear a stun belt, in court or otherwise, is a violation of american principles! It is also unconstitutional!
So, if I save $100.00 cash per week, from my $500.00 per week paycheck, for 50 years, at which time, I will have saved $260,000.00, the government can raid my home and take my money, just by saying it is drug money! Shouldn't the government, have some kind of evidence of drugs, rather, than just saying we are the government and we will take anything you own, anytime we choose? Tyranny is upon us! If you don't know your rights, you don't have any!