ILNews

IBA: Local Attorneys to Lead Baker & Daniels

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
froehle-tom-mugBW Froehle
barrett-david-mugBW Barrett
pfeiffer-hud-mugBW Pfeiffer

Baker & Daniels LLP has announced its top leadership positions for 2011, including the election of Indianapolis lawyer David Barrett and re-election of Hud Pfeiffer to three-year terms on the law firm’s strategic and policy board.

Tom Froehle, former member of the Indianapolis Bar Foundation Board of Directors, is Baker & Daniels chair and chief executive partner. He re-appointed the following as members of the firm’s executive committee:

Roger Flower, chief operating officer;

Steve Jackson, who focuses his legal practice in health care and life sciences;

Scott Kosnoff, managing partner for professional personnel who practices in insurance and financial services;

Greg Utken, managing partner for legal practices who focuses his practice in labor and employment law; and

Froehle also is a member of the executive committee, which is responsible for day-to-day operations of the firm. Members of Baker & Daniels’ strategic and policy board include Froehle and Flower as well as:

David Barrett, a partner and group leader of the business and corporate finance team;

Mike Nader, a partner and group leader of the employee benefits practice;

Hud Pfeiffer, a partner and group leader of the labor and employment practice;

Chris Scanlon, a partner practicing in business and commercial litigation; and

Andrew Soshnick, a partner practicing in family law matters.

The strategic and policy board’s members are elected by the firm’s partners, and as its name implies, the board is responsible for establishing the strategic direction and policies for the firm.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Is it possible to amend an order for child support due to false paternity?

  2. He did not have an "unlicensed handgun" in his pocket. Firearms are not licensed in Indiana. He apparently possessed a handgun without a license to carry, but it's not the handgun that is licensed (or registered).

  3. Once again, Indiana's legislature proves how friendly it is to monopolies. This latest bill by Hershman demonstrates the lengths Indiana's representatives are willing to go to put big business's (especially utilities') interests above those of everyday working people. Maassal argues that if the technology (solar) is so good, it will be able to compete on its own. Too bad he doesn't feel the same way about the industries he represents. Instead, he wants to cut the small credit consumers get for using solar in order to "add a 'level of certainty'" to his industry. I haven't heard of or seen such a blatant money-grab by an industry since the days when our federal, state, and local governments were run by the railroad. Senator Hershman's constituents should remember this bill the next time he runs for office, and they should penalize him accordingly.

  4. From his recent appearance on WRTV to this story here, Frank is everywhere. Couldn't happen to a nicer guy, although he should stop using Eric Schnauffer for his 7th Circuit briefs. They're not THAT hard.

  5. They learn our language prior to coming here. My grandparents who came over on the boat, had to learn English and become familiarize with Americas customs and culture. They are in our land now, speak ENGLISH!!

ADVERTISEMENT