ILNews

IBA: Mark Calendars for Sedona, Arizona

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indianapolis Bar Association is going on the road with CLE to stunning Sedona, Ariz., November 15-17, 2012. Based at Enchantment Resort, the getaway provides rest, relaxation and six hours of continuing legal education.

The Enchantment Resort, rated by Travel+Leisure as one of the 100 best resorts in America, combines the unique natural beauty of the Southwest with superb accommodations, dining, spa services and exciting activities. Those attending will enjoy an opening night cocktail party and dinner on Thursday, November 15 followed by two mornings of CLE courses for attorneys from a variety of disciplines including family law and criminal law. Free afternoons will leave time to experience all the area has to offer.

Special room rates at Enchantment Resort will be available for event attendees. The cost for a Casita Bedroom/Deluxe Studio will be $189 per night, plus a $25 resort fee daily and a one-time porterage fee of $12 per person. Casita Junior Suites are $269 per night, plus fees; and Casita Suites (one bedroom) are $403 per night, plus fees.

Registration for the 2012 CLE Getaway, anticipated to begin at $375, will open in April. Sponsorship opportunities are open now and start at $1,000, including registration for the conference.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. As one of the many consumers affected by this breach, I found my bank data had been lifted and used to buy over $200 of various merchandise in New York. I did a pretty good job of tracing the purchases to stores around a college campus just from the info on my bank statement. Hm. Mr. Hill, I would like my $200 back! It doesn't belong to the state, in my opinion. Give it back to the consumers affected. I had to freeze my credit and take out data protection, order a new debit card and wait until it arrived. I deserve something for my trouble!

  2. Don't we have bigger issues to concern ourselves with?

  3. Anyone who takes the time to study disciplinary and bar admission cases in Indiana ... much of which is, as a matter of course and by intent, off the record, would have a very difficult time drawing lines that did not take into account things which are not supposed to matter, such as affiliations, associations, associates and the like. Justice Hoosier style is a far departure than what issues in most other parts of North America. (More like Central America, in fact.) See, e.g., http://www.theindianalawyer.com/indiana-attorney-illegally-practicing-in-florida-suspended-for-18-months/PARAMS/article/42200 When while the Indiana court system end the cruel practice of killing prophets of due process and those advocating for blind justice?

  4. Wouldn't this call for an investigation of Government corruption? Chief Justice Loretta Rush, wrote that the case warranted the high court’s review because the method the Indiana Court of Appeals used to reach its decision was “a significant departure from the law.” Specifically, David wrote that the appellate panel ruled after reweighing of the evidence, which is NOT permissible at the appellate level. **But yet, they look the other way while an innocent child was taken by a loving mother who did nothing wrong"

  5. Different rules for different folks....

ADVERTISEMENT