Ayers
By The Hon. Cynthia Ayers
In November 2008, the Indianapolis Bar Association Board of Directors approved a resolution authorizing the formation of
a new task force charged with finding ways to confront the explosion in mortgage foreclosures in Marion County. The Indianapolis
Mortgage Foreclosure Task Force (IMFTF) was established, comprised of volunteer lawyers, judges, and state agency managers.
Members included lawyers from the Indiana Bankers Association, the Attorney General’s Office, Legal Services Organization,
United Auto Workers Legal Services, the Indiana Mortgage Foreclosure Prevention Network, the Christian Legal Clinic, HUD,
debt management agencies, members of the private bar and other concerned citizens.
The initial responsibility of the IMFTF was to determine the magnitude of the mortgage foreclosure crisis and develop an
appropriate action plan. The committee developed ideas on how the bar association might help distressed homeowners and lenders
and the entire community as a whole. Members quickly realized that in addition to families facing personal financial crisis,
banks were being inundated with foreclosed properties. Empty homes were often magnets for criminal activity and consequently,
directly related to rapidly falling home values.
Subcommittees were set up to facilitate a diversified approach to critical issues. Three major objectives were identified:
court case-management, with the use of Alternate Dispute Resolution methods to promote face-to-face meetings between borrowers
and lenders; education and training of lawyers, to facilitate pro bono representation of homeowners; and collaboration with
the Indiana Housing Foreclosure Network, to encourage the referral of borrowers to credit counseling and debt management services.
For years, the Indiana foreclosure process followed a general routine. Initially, the lender filed suit after payments were
missed, service was obtained on the defendant homeowner, the appropriate pleadings were presented timely to the court, and
if done properly, default judgment was entered. Next, the defaulted borrowers either voluntarily left or stayed in possession
until evicted after a Sheriff’s Sale. As the economic crisis worsened nationwide, it became increasingly apparent that
an opportunity for settlement discussions may be a better approach for all parties. Based upon success in Pennsylvania, Ohio,
Connecticut, and Illinois, the IMFTF drafted a local rule, later approved by the Marion Superior Court in March 2009. The
local rule required a settlement conference between borrower and lender in owner-occupied foreclosure cases.
Concurrently, the federal government required banks to offer loan modification programs to eligible borrowers. In July 2009,
SB492, modeled in large part after the aforementioned Marion County local rule and sponsored by Senator Karen Tallian of Portage,
Indiana, was enacted. (I.C. 32-30-10.5 et seq.). SB492 made settlement conferences available to all homeowners who
requested them within certain timelines.
Since the passage of the local rule and SB492, much progress has been made. In Marion Civil Court IV, for example, 197 settlement
conferences have occurred; of those, 27% resulted in dismissal of the foreclosure action and 15% are pending with proposed
settlements.
In early 2010, the Indiana Supreme Court introduced pilot projects in Marion, Allen, Monroe, and St. Joseph counties which
provide logistical coordinators and facilitators who manage the settlement conferences. In Marion County, three courts are
part of the pilot program: Circuit Court and Civil Courts IV and X. This program has streamlined the foreclosure process,
proving highly beneficial to successful outcomes. In-person facilitation has insured good faith settlement negotiation between
borrower and lender.
In addition to these measures, other members of the IMFTF were educating and training volunteer attorneys to represent borrowers
pro bono. To date, over 1000 attorneys statewide have received foreclosure training. Members involved with foreclosure
prevention at the state level have also continued to work by keeping the crisis statistics current, providing access to twenty-four
hour debt counseling services, and affording relief to homeowners through the “Get Hope Get Help Hotline,” (1-800-382-5516).
In sum, the Indianapolis Mortgage Foreclosure Task Force has met many of its goals and continues to move forward. Improvements
are needed to encourage and expedite case resolution, such as the linking of homeowners directly to a legal-advice hotline.
A better process for the exchange of information between debt counselors and case facilitators may reduce duplicative efforts.
Additionally, the establishment of a confidential E-Repository for all settlement-related documents could eliminate cancelled
meetings.
The Indianapolis Bar Association can be proud of the accomplishments of the Mortgage ForeclosureTask Force. Desperate times
have called for a much needed change in mortgage foreclosure case management and local lawyers and judges have answered the
call.•














I highly recommend Deanna and her team of professionals that serve the legal community. Great information and many thanks for sharing.
they are pushing these cases against lawyers too far. thought-crime.
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.