ILNews

IBA: Nod to Professionalism

Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

For her ability to help opposing parties in family law cases reach peaceful solutions.
 

goldenberg-jill-mug Goldenberg

Goldenberg, a partner at Cohen Garelick & Glazier who practices family law and domestic mediation has earned the respect of her peers in a field of law known for its volatility. “She is very adept at letting her clients see the advantage of resolving issues amicably,” says family law practitioner Melissa Avery of Avery & Cheerva LLP. Competitors praise her calming demeanor and willingness to mediate late into the night if necessary. “She is steady as a rock and has the intellectual chops to get the job done,’” says Michael Ruppert of Ruppert & Schaefer, P.C.

Goldenberg has been with Cohen-Garelick & Glazier since graduating from Boson University School of Law in 1993.

IBA PROFESSIONALISM STANDARD No. 1

Commitment – We are committed to practicing law in a manner that maintains and fosters public confidence in our profession, faithfully serves our clients, and fulfills our responsibilities to the legal system.
__________

If you know of someone whom you believe exemplifies one of IBA’s five standards, please e-mail your nomination to iba@indybar.org.

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I need an experienced attorney to handle a breach of contract matter. Kindly respond for more details. Graham Young

  2. I thought the slurs were the least grave aspects of her misconduct, since they had nothing to do with her being on the bench. Why then do I suspect they were the focus? I find this a troubling trend. At least she was allowed to keep her law license.

  3. Section 6 of Article I of the Indiana Constitution is pretty clear and unequivocal: "Section 6. No money shall be drawn from the treasury for the benefit of any religious or theological institution."

  4. Video pen? Nice work, "JW"! Let this be a lesson and a caution to all disgruntled ex-spouses (or soon-to-be ex-spouses) . . . you may think that altercation is going to get you some satisfaction . . . it will not.

  5. First comment on this thread is a fitting final comment on this thread, as that the MCBA never answered Duncan's fine question, and now even Eric Holder agrees that the MCBA was in material error as to the facts: "I don't get it" from Duncan December 1, 2014 5:10 PM "The Grand Jury met for 25 days and heard 70 hours of testimony according to this article and they made a decision that no crime occurred. On what basis does the MCBA conclude that their decision was "unjust"? What special knowledge or evidence does the MCBA have that the Grand Jury hearing this matter was unaware of? The system that we as lawyers are sworn to uphold made a decision that there was insufficient proof that officer committed a crime. How can any of us say we know better what was right than the jury that actually heard all of the the evidence in this case."

ADVERTISEMENT