ILNews

IBA Pro Bono Awards: Meeting the needs of our community

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Making a difference in providing free legal assistance to our neighbors in Indianapolis is second nature to this year’s winners of the Indianapolis Bar Association’s Pro Bono Awards.

The IndyBar recognizes member attorneys who give their time assisting individuals and entities, as well as a law student member of the Association. This year’s recipients will be honored at the Indianapolis Bar Association/Foundation Recognition Luncheon on Tuesday, November 29, at noon at the Conrad Indianapolis, 50 W. Washington St. They are:

Practicing Attorney, Aiding Individuals

Nearly four years ago, a homeless and mentally ill man entered the lobby of Baker & Daniels and asked to meet with an attorney upon learning the firm had a disabilities pro bono working group. He was seeking assistance to overturn a guardianship set up in Parke County, Indiana that he maintained resulted in the guardian causing his house to be destroyed against his wishes and without his consent. To complicate the process the client suffers from mental illness. Enter Sarah Jenkins and Kathy Osborn, partners with Baker & Daniels LLP.

They litigated the client’s cause to the successful result at the Indiana Court of Appeals, which reversed a trial court’s ruling. The resulting opinion makes new law helping to govern the manner in which guardians perform their duties in Indiana and also breaks new ground on a national level with respect to the interpretation of a due process right of a person under a guardianship, so it will benefit not only the client, but literally thousands of people similarly situated.

Practicing Attorney, Aiding Entities that Serve the Indigent

Not only a partner in Bingham McHale LLP’s Private Client Group (Estate and Wealth Transfer Planning Group), their Business Advisory Department and co-chair of the Bingham McHale Women’s Forum, Christi Anderson finds time to do pro bono work with a variety of organizations. She donates time to Indianapolis Continuity of Care, is an active volunteer with the IndyBar’s Hospice and Low Asset Wills, has served as a GAL in Juvenile Court several times, and under her leadership the number of central Indiana residents gaining assistance through the IndyBar’s Ask a Lawyer free legal advice event increased by 5%.

Law Student

In June 2011, Matthew Gaudin, a student Indiana University School of Law – Indianapolis, began work at the Neighborhood Christian Legal Clinic as an AmeriCorps VISTA Summer Associate working with consumer law and Project GRACE which serves ex-offender clients. In nominating Gaudin, the clinic called him, “a leader among his fellow interns, helping them navigate their case load an answering questions regarding legal issues and current clients.” He was so successful during his internship he was asked to stay and his responsibilities have been expanded. Known for his diligence, Gaudin has logged over 200 hours of services in the past three months alone. The clinic summed up their nomination by saying, “The Clinic has come to value greatly, the skills, intelligence and kindness Mr. Gaudin has to offer and we are excited to see the attorney he will become in the future.”

Those wishing to attend the awards luncheon are encouraged to register online at www.indybar.org. The cost is $30 per person.•
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. It appears the police and prosecutors are allowed to change the rules halfway through the game to suit themselves. I am surprised that the congress has not yet eliminated the right to a trial in cases involving any type of forensic evidence. That would suit their foolish law and order police state views. I say we eliminate the statute of limitations for crimes committed by members of congress and other government employees. Of course they would never do that. They are all corrupt cowards!!!

  2. Poor Judge Brown probably thought that by slavishly serving the godz of the age her violations of 18th century concepts like due process and the rule of law would be overlooked. Mayhaps she was merely a Judge ahead of her time?

  3. in a lawyer discipline case Judge Brown, now removed, was presiding over a hearing about a lawyer accused of the supposedly heinous ethical violation of saying the words "Illegal immigrant." (IN re Barker) http://www.in.gov/judiciary/files/order-discipline-2013-55S00-1008-DI-429.pdf .... I wonder if when we compare the egregious violations of due process by Judge Brown, to her chiding of another lawyer for politically incorrectness, if there are any conclusions to be drawn about what kind of person, what kind of judge, what kind of apparatchik, is busy implementing the agenda of political correctness and making off-limits legit advocacy about an adverse party in a suit whose illegal alien status is relevant? I am just asking the question, the reader can make own conclsuion. Oh wait-- did I use the wrong adjective-- let me rephrase that, um undocumented alien?

  4. of course the bigger questions of whether or not the people want to pay for ANY bussing is off limits, due to the Supreme Court protecting the people from DEMOCRACY. Several decades hence from desegregation and bussing plans and we STILL need to be taking all this taxpayer money to combat mostly-imagined "discrimination" in the most obviously failed social program of the postwar period.

  5. You can put your photos anywhere you like... When someone steals it they know it doesn't belong to them. And, a man getting a divorce is automatically not a nice guy...? That's ridiculous. Since when is need of money a conflict of interest? That would mean that no one should have a job unless they are already financially solvent without a job... A photographer is also under no obligation to use a watermark (again, people know when a photo doesn't belong to them) or provide contact information. Hey, he didn't make it easy for me to pay him so I'll just take it! Well heck, might as well walk out of the grocery store with a cart full of food because the lines are too long and you don't find that convenient. "Only in Indiana." Oh, now you're passing judgement on an entire state... What state do you live in? I need to characterize everyone in your state as ignorant and opinionated. And the final bit of ignorance; assuming a photo anyone would want is lucky and then how much does your camera have to cost to make it a good photo, in your obviously relevant opinion?

ADVERTISEMENT