The Indianapolis-Marion County Public Library recently announced they are now providing patent search assistance at the downtown
Central Library, 40 E. St. Clair Street.
According to the IMCPL Central Library receives support from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, meaning that
library patrons have access to the same patent database, PubWest, used by the federal government to examine, award or deny
patents. This database can be found on dedicated computers on the 4th floor of Central Library, where certain librarians have
been trained by the Patent Office in Washington, D.C. in using this patent database and can explain what constitutes a viable
patent search.
In a press release issued by the IMCPL, Central Library Reference Librarian Phyllis Karrh is quoted as saying, “A lawyer’s
office can do a search for you for a fee, but a good search on your own can help cut your legal costs.” She added, “We’ll
aid you in understanding how to set up a search to determine if there’s anything out there that would result in a denial
of your application.”
Those seeking assistance are encouraged to call Central Library at 275-4100, and ask for 4th floor librarians, to schedule
an appointment in order to discuss search strategy that can begin the quest to determine if their ideas are unique. The IMCPL
notes that although the librarians cannot make a final judgment on whether an idea is patentable, nor can they offer legal
advice, they can assist novices in their searches.
Central Library is designated an official Patent and Trademark Depository Library by the United States Patent and Trademark
Office in Washington, D.C. For more information on patents and trademarks, frequently asked questions and Central Library
patent assistance, visit the IMCPL’s website at www.imcpl.org.•














The court of appeals not only tries to rewrite or interpret the law to suit their fancy, now they choose play stupid as well. Every consideration must be given to pro se litigants, who are not held to the same standards as attorneys, as stated by,SCOTUS. I assume they didn't have a lawyer, since one wasn't mentioned and I strongly suggest thatb the rest of the, origional petitioners get back in there and fight for their rights.
the irony of situations like this is that the clients whom conour cheated are the ones who should be pulling hardest for him to remain free and keep his law license, so they have some hopes of him paying back. really bury the guy deep and then there will be little hope of restitution
Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.