ILNews

IBA: Volunteer Needed to Coordinate IndyBar Hospice Program

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Want to provide legal help to dozens of terminally ill people in their last days without ever leaving your office? The IndyBar is searching for an attorney volunteer to coordinate its Hospice Program.

This volunteer will not perform direct pro bono services with clients, but will be the point of contact with Wishard Hospital, Methodist Hospital and St. Francis Hospital. The coordinator must be readily available to receive fax or email referrals from the hospitals and pass them along to the attorney volunteers. The coordinator briefly reviews the referral to make sure it is appropriate to the program before passing it to the volunteer. Based on the patient’s health, some referrals require immediate turn-around, so the coordinator should have support staff to assist if they have a job that takes them out of the office on a regular basis.

The coordinator will work closely with and be supported by IndyBar staff and the Pro Bono Standing Committee, but does not need to be a member of the committee. Twice a year, the coordinator will create a six month schedule of the volunteers’ weekly assignments. The Coordinator (with staff assistance) will keep a current “database” or spreadsheet with volunteers’ contact information and track how many hours were donated to each case.

The new coordinator will be orientated by the retiring Hospice Coordinator and if secured by Dec. 17, will help create the volunteer schedule for January through June 2013. The outgoing coordinator will also introduce the new coordinator to the hospital contacts.

The number of referrals per week varies, but is typically less than three. Most referrals are able to be handled by the assigned pair of attorneys, so weekly time on the coordinator’s end is minimal. For more information, please contact Caren Chopp, Pro Bono and Legal Services Coordinator, at cchopp@indybar.org.

About the IndyBar Hospice Program

The IndyBar Hospice Program volunteers assist hospice patients through consultations and offering limited representation (primarily with end of life concerns and forms), through Wishard, Methodist, St. Francis and the Abbie Hunt Brice Home. Volunteer pairs address all hospital referrals made during their assigned calendar week (typically three hours of service) and are assigned two to four weeks per year. Training is available via DVD.

Attorney volunteers can comfort hospice patients in so many ways with just a little bit of time. Answering questions, executing powers of attorney or simple wills, or transferring a car title can relieve the mental anguish from which a patient suffers. Some attorneys learn that within hours of their consultation, a patient passes with their affairs in order. With a few phone calls, one attorney volunteer helped unravel a 20-year-old matter that was preventing a cancer patient from receiving Medicaid assistance for chemotherapy and pain medications.

Our generous volunteers touch more people than they expect. Recently an attorney accepted a referral and met with a patient regarding a health care power of attorney. As he and the patient were executing the documents, the patient’s roommate asked if the attorney could help her as well. She had documents prepared and was in need of notary assistance. With an extra five minutes, this volunteer positively affected another struggling, sick and low-income terminal patient.

Interested in getting involved with the Hospice Project or any of the IndyBar’s other pro bono programs? Contact Caren Chopp at cchopp@indybar.org.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I grew up on a farm and live in the county and it's interesting that the big industrial farmers like Jeff Shoaf don't live next to their industrial operations...

  2. So that none are misinformed by my posting wihtout a non de plume here, please allow me to state that I am NOT an Indiana licensed attorney, although I am an Indiana resident approved to practice law and represent clients in Indiana's fed court of Nth Dist and before the 7th circuit. I remain licensed in KS, since 1996, no discipline. This must be clarified since the IN court records will reveal that I did sit for and pass the Indiana bar last February. Yet be not confused by the fact that I was so allowed to be tested .... I am not, to be clear in the service of my duty to be absolutely candid about this, I AM NOT a member of the Indiana bar, and might never be so licensed given my unrepented from errors of thought documented in this opinion, at fn2, which likely supports Mr Smith's initial post in this thread: http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-7th-circuit/1592921.html

  3. When I served the State of Kansas as Deputy AG over Consumer Protection & Antitrust for four years, supervising 20 special agents and assistant attorneys general (back before the IBLE denied me the right to practice law in Indiana for not having the right stuff and pretty much crushed my legal career) we had a saying around the office: Resist the lure of the ring!!! It was a take off on Tolkiem, the idea that absolute power (I signed investigative subpoenas as a judge would in many other contexts, no need to show probable cause)could corrupt absolutely. We feared that we would overreach constitutional limits if not reminded, over and over, to be mindful to not do so. Our approach in so challenging one another was Madisonian, as the following quotes from the Father of our Constitution reveal: The essence of Government is power; and power, lodged as it must be in human hands, will ever be liable to abuse. We are right to take alarm at the first experiment upon our liberties. I believe there are more instances of the abridgement of freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments by those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations. Liberty may be endangered by the abuse of liberty, but also by the abuse of power. All men having power ought to be mistrusted. -- James Madison, Federalist Papers and other sources: http://www.constitution.org/jm/jm_quotes.htm RESIST THE LURE OF THE RING ALL YE WITH POLITICAL OR JUDICIAL POWER!

  4. My dear Mr Smith, I respect your opinions and much enjoy your posts here. We do differ on our view of the benefits and viability of the American Experiment in Ordered Liberty. While I do agree that it could be better, and that your points in criticism are well taken, Utopia does indeed mean nowhere. I think Madison, Jefferson, Adams and company got it about as good as it gets in a fallen post-Enlightenment social order. That said, a constitution only protects the citizens if it is followed. We currently have a bevy of public officials and judicial agents who believe that their subjectivism, their personal ideology, their elitist fears and concerns and cause celebs trump the constitutions of our forefathers. This is most troubling. More to follow in the next post on that subject.

  5. Yep I am not Bryan Brown. Bryan you appear to be a bigger believer in the Constitution than I am. Were I still a big believer then I might be using my real name like you. Personally, I am no longer a fan of secularism. I favor the confessional state. In religious mattes, it seems to me that social diversity is chaos and conflict, while uniformity is order and peace.... secularism has been imposed by America on other nations now by force and that has not exactly worked out very well.... I think the American historical experiment with disestablishmentarianism is withering on the vine before our eyes..... Since I do not know if that is OK for an officially licensed lawyer to say, I keep the nom de plume.

ADVERTISEMENT