ILNews

IBA: Volunteer Needed to Coordinate IndyBar Hospice Program

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Want to provide legal help to dozens of terminally ill people in their last days without ever leaving your office? The IndyBar is searching for an attorney volunteer to coordinate its Hospice Program.

This volunteer will not perform direct pro bono services with clients, but will be the point of contact with Wishard Hospital, Methodist Hospital and St. Francis Hospital. The coordinator must be readily available to receive fax or email referrals from the hospitals and pass them along to the attorney volunteers. The coordinator briefly reviews the referral to make sure it is appropriate to the program before passing it to the volunteer. Based on the patient’s health, some referrals require immediate turn-around, so the coordinator should have support staff to assist if they have a job that takes them out of the office on a regular basis.

The coordinator will work closely with and be supported by IndyBar staff and the Pro Bono Standing Committee, but does not need to be a member of the committee. Twice a year, the coordinator will create a six month schedule of the volunteers’ weekly assignments. The Coordinator (with staff assistance) will keep a current “database” or spreadsheet with volunteers’ contact information and track how many hours were donated to each case.

The new coordinator will be orientated by the retiring Hospice Coordinator and if secured by Dec. 17, will help create the volunteer schedule for January through June 2013. The outgoing coordinator will also introduce the new coordinator to the hospital contacts.

The number of referrals per week varies, but is typically less than three. Most referrals are able to be handled by the assigned pair of attorneys, so weekly time on the coordinator’s end is minimal. For more information, please contact Caren Chopp, Pro Bono and Legal Services Coordinator, at cchopp@indybar.org.

About the IndyBar Hospice Program

The IndyBar Hospice Program volunteers assist hospice patients through consultations and offering limited representation (primarily with end of life concerns and forms), through Wishard, Methodist, St. Francis and the Abbie Hunt Brice Home. Volunteer pairs address all hospital referrals made during their assigned calendar week (typically three hours of service) and are assigned two to four weeks per year. Training is available via DVD.

Attorney volunteers can comfort hospice patients in so many ways with just a little bit of time. Answering questions, executing powers of attorney or simple wills, or transferring a car title can relieve the mental anguish from which a patient suffers. Some attorneys learn that within hours of their consultation, a patient passes with their affairs in order. With a few phone calls, one attorney volunteer helped unravel a 20-year-old matter that was preventing a cancer patient from receiving Medicaid assistance for chemotherapy and pain medications.

Our generous volunteers touch more people than they expect. Recently an attorney accepted a referral and met with a patient regarding a health care power of attorney. As he and the patient were executing the documents, the patient’s roommate asked if the attorney could help her as well. She had documents prepared and was in need of notary assistance. With an extra five minutes, this volunteer positively affected another struggling, sick and low-income terminal patient.

Interested in getting involved with the Hospice Project or any of the IndyBar’s other pro bono programs? Contact Caren Chopp at cchopp@indybar.org.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Such things are no more elections than those in the late, unlamented Soviet Union.

  2. It appears the police and prosecutors are allowed to change the rules halfway through the game to suit themselves. I am surprised that the congress has not yet eliminated the right to a trial in cases involving any type of forensic evidence. That would suit their foolish law and order police state views. I say we eliminate the statute of limitations for crimes committed by members of congress and other government employees. Of course they would never do that. They are all corrupt cowards!!!

  3. Poor Judge Brown probably thought that by slavishly serving the godz of the age her violations of 18th century concepts like due process and the rule of law would be overlooked. Mayhaps she was merely a Judge ahead of her time?

  4. in a lawyer discipline case Judge Brown, now removed, was presiding over a hearing about a lawyer accused of the supposedly heinous ethical violation of saying the words "Illegal immigrant." (IN re Barker) http://www.in.gov/judiciary/files/order-discipline-2013-55S00-1008-DI-429.pdf .... I wonder if when we compare the egregious violations of due process by Judge Brown, to her chiding of another lawyer for politically incorrectness, if there are any conclusions to be drawn about what kind of person, what kind of judge, what kind of apparatchik, is busy implementing the agenda of political correctness and making off-limits legit advocacy about an adverse party in a suit whose illegal alien status is relevant? I am just asking the question, the reader can make own conclsuion. Oh wait-- did I use the wrong adjective-- let me rephrase that, um undocumented alien?

  5. of course the bigger questions of whether or not the people want to pay for ANY bussing is off limits, due to the Supreme Court protecting the people from DEMOCRACY. Several decades hence from desegregation and bussing plans and we STILL need to be taking all this taxpayer money to combat mostly-imagined "discrimination" in the most obviously failed social program of the postwar period.

ADVERTISEMENT