Ethics CLE - 2013

Back to TopPrint EventE-mail Event
EST
Practicing Law in Indiana: Ethics
PRESENTED IN PARTNERSHIP WITH: BGD
Date: Tuesday, October 29, 2013
Location: Bingham Greenebaum Doll, Indianapolis
Registration: 12:30 - 1:00 pm
Program: 1:00 - 3:15 pm
Credit: 2.0 CLE/Ethics hours
Individual Seat: $89
Government Employee/Paralegal: $79
Chair & Moderator: James Bell, Bingham Greenebaum Doll
Speakers include: G. Michael Witte, Indiana Disciplinary Commission
Dennis McKinney, Indiana Disciplinary Commission
Donald Lundberg, Barnes & Thornburg
Jon Pactor, Attorney-at-Law
James Bell, Bingham Greenebaum Doll
 
Topics include:
  • Ethical parameters of fee agreements
  • Practicing law from a risk/malpractice point of view
  • Review of cases that have come before the Commission and insight on what those decisions mean to lawyers in their practice
  • Examination of judicial criticism including outcome of the Dixon case
  • Carefully chosen words: Ethics of communication to courts in advertising and other arenas
 
 


See below to register online or to print a registration form
Click here for printable registration
If paying by check, please print and mail your registration.



No refunds will be given for cancellations received after Oct. 24.


For registration information regarding this event, please contact Karen Aruta.

Contact: Karen Aruta
Contact Phone: (317) 472-5201
Contact E-mail: karuta@ibj.com
Back to Events
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Major social engineering imposed by judicial order well in advance of democratic change, has been the story of the whole post ww2 period. Contraception, desegregation, abortion, gay marriage: all rammed down the throats of Americans who didn't vote to change existing laws on any such thing, by the unelected lifetime tenure Supreme court heirarchs. Maybe people came to accept those things once imposed upon them, but, that's accommodation not acceptance; and surely not democracy. So let's quit lying to the kids telling them this is a democracy. Some sort of oligarchy, but no democracy that's for sure, and it never was. A bourgeois republic from day one.

  2. JD Massur, yes, brings to mind a similar stand at a Texas Mission in 1836. Or Vladivostok in 1918. As you seemingly gloat, to the victors go the spoils ... let the looting begin, right?

  3. I always wondered why high fence deer hunting was frowned upon? I guess you need to keep the population steady. If you don't, no one can enjoy hunting! Thanks for the post! Fence

  4. Whether you support "gay marriage" or not is not the issue. The issue is whether the SCOTUS can extract from an unmentionable somewhere the notion that the Constitution forbids government "interference" in the "right" to marry. Just imagine time-traveling to Philadelphia in 1787. Ask James Madison if the document he and his fellows just wrote allowed him- or forbade government to "interfere" with- his "right" to marry George Washington? He would have immediately- and justly- summoned the Sergeant-at-Arms to throw your sorry self out into the street. Far from being a day of liberation, this is a day of capitulation by the Rule of Law to the Rule of What's Happening Now.

  5. With today's ruling, AG Zoeller's arguments in the cases of Obamacare and Same-sex Marriage can be relegated to the ash heap of history. 0-fer

ADVERTISEMENT