ILNews

ILAS keeps eye on fundraising after successful holiday dollar campaign

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indianapolis Legal Aid Society continues to position itself to cope with a significant loss of support from its main contributor.

The nonprofit had a “very, very successful” holiday dollar campaign, according to ILAS general counsel John Floreancig, and has adopted a blueprint for soliciting more private donations.

ILAS has to focus more on fundraising after its largest contributor, United Way of Central Indiana, announced a cut in appropriations by nearly $126,000. United Way made the reduction as part of a change in policy that its appropriations comprise no more than 35 percent of any agency’s budget.

Prior to the shift in policy, United Way contributions supported about 51 percent of ILAS’s budget.

For the 2013 holiday season, the annual holiday dollar fundraiser netted a record of about $156,000, topping the 2012 result by roughly $3,000.

“I think we got the word out to lawyers a little better this year and we had more people out beating the bushes for us,” Floreancig said.

In addition, the ILAS board of directors adopted a fundraising plan developed by consultants Johnson Grossnickle and Associates in Greenwood. Primarily, the multi-phased plan calls for the agency to increase its marketing by explaining more about the services it provides to the general public and targeting potential donors.

Also, the ILAS will be adding a development specialist to its staff to help with the fundraising efforts.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Major social engineering imposed by judicial order well in advance of democratic change, has been the story of the whole post ww2 period. Contraception, desegregation, abortion, gay marriage: all rammed down the throats of Americans who didn't vote to change existing laws on any such thing, by the unelected lifetime tenure Supreme court heirarchs. Maybe people came to accept those things once imposed upon them, but, that's accommodation not acceptance; and surely not democracy. So let's quit lying to the kids telling them this is a democracy. Some sort of oligarchy, but no democracy that's for sure, and it never was. A bourgeois republic from day one.

  2. JD Massur, yes, brings to mind a similar stand at a Texas Mission in 1836. Or Vladivostok in 1918. As you seemingly gloat, to the victors go the spoils ... let the looting begin, right?

  3. I always wondered why high fence deer hunting was frowned upon? I guess you need to keep the population steady. If you don't, no one can enjoy hunting! Thanks for the post! Fence

  4. Whether you support "gay marriage" or not is not the issue. The issue is whether the SCOTUS can extract from an unmentionable somewhere the notion that the Constitution forbids government "interference" in the "right" to marry. Just imagine time-traveling to Philadelphia in 1787. Ask James Madison if the document he and his fellows just wrote allowed him- or forbade government to "interfere" with- his "right" to marry George Washington? He would have immediately- and justly- summoned the Sergeant-at-Arms to throw your sorry self out into the street. Far from being a day of liberation, this is a day of capitulation by the Rule of Law to the Rule of What's Happening Now.

  5. With today's ruling, AG Zoeller's arguments in the cases of Obamacare and Same-sex Marriage can be relegated to the ash heap of history. 0-fer

ADVERTISEMENT