ILS Medical Legal Partnership gives Midtown clients access to legal services

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The cockroaches crawling around the apartment were not enough to force the landlord to break the lease agreement.

For any tenant, an insect infestation would be unbearable. But for the young man living there, the bugs, along with the loud noises and criminal mischief, were exacerbating his mental illness and pushing him toward the desperate act of fleeing.

His caseworkers at the Midtown Community Mental Health Center reached for a form letter, checked off the deplorable conditions of the living space, and demanded the apartment owner cancel the terms of the lease.

ils03-15col.jpg Jay Chaudhary, along with interns Sarah Dunkley (left) and Aishah Shamsi, provide legal assistance to clients as part of the Midtown/Indiana Legal Services Medical Legal Partnership. (IL Photo/ Perry Reichanadter)

Before they sent it, the team from Midtown showed the letter to Abhishek “Jay” Chaudhary, and that, said social worker Lael Hill, made all the difference.

Chaudhary is an attorney at Indiana Legal Services who directs the Midtown/ILS Medical Legal Partnership. He helps navigate through the legal entanglements that can ensnare Midtown clients, all of whom struggle with severe mental illnesses like bipolar disorder, antisocial personality disorder, schizoaffective disorder, and most cope with symptoms of paranoia, depression and hallucinations.

Like the young man in the apartment, legal problems can add to the already overwhelming stress in their lives and make their mental health worse.

When he reviewed the letter, Chaudhary first rewrote it, softening the tone, and sent it to the building manager who rebuffed him. The young attorney then found the landlord’s name and wrote a letter to him, outlining the issues in the apartment that violated the federal Fair Housing Act.

Not only did the landlord consent to releasing the young man from the lease, he also disinfected the tenant’s personal items and delivered them to his new residence.

“Without the help of Jay, probably what would have happened is (the Midtown client) would have left and the landlord would have probably been pursuing a court case against him for rent,” Hill said.

As a result, she continued, the young man’s credit rating would have been ruined, and he likely would have had difficultly finding another place to live.

The Midtown/ILS Medical Legal Partnership began on a limited basis in 2009 and is believed to be one of a few mental health partnerships in the country. Chaudhary is credited with having the vision and the drive to enact the idea, find the funding and offer a much-need service to the mental health clinic.

A 2009 graduate of Indiana University Maurer School of Law, Chaudhary said he has always wanted to work in legal services and is “passionate about giving marginalized people a voice.”

Midtown Community Mental Health Center is the mental health division of Wishard Health Care. The hospital established its own medical-legal partnership in 2008 with Faegre Baker Daniels LLP, Neighborhood Christian Legal Clinic, Indiana Legal Services and the Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law Health & Human Rights Clinic.

Like the Midtown MLP, the Wishard partnership is aimed at improving patient health by providing legal advocacy.

Almost tabled

Nearly three years after the Midtown MLP launched, Norman Metzger, executive director of Indiana Legal Services, remains enthusiastic about the program. He gives a great amount of credit for the success to Chaudhary and is haunted by the thought that the idea could have been tabled.

He was intrigued when Chaudhary approached him with the idea of forming a partnership with the mental health service provider, but the economic recession and budgets cuts had reduced ILS funding by nearly $2 million in three years so no money was available to support the program.

The executive director said he “could have blown” the opportunity because of the strained coffers. However, two separate $15,000 grants from the Ruth Lilly Philanthropic Foundation, filtered through the United Way of Central Indiana, and the St. Margaret’s Hospital Guild got the program going on a part-time basis in 2010 and 2011. A two-year, $120,000 grant from the Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust has turned the partnership into a full-time program.

Year to date in 2012, Chaudhary has had 70 referrals. Twenty-one clients were provided with brief service while another 32 clients were accepted for representation.

Before the partnership, Metzger said these individuals were falling through cracks.

“These are poor people who are in such challenging and compromising situations that they can’t, on their own, access legal services,” Metzger said.

He called the Midtown clients “literally most vulnerable people in our society.” In addition to not knowing how to access legal help, they often do not even know their problem can be solved with a lawyer.

Dr. Jeffrey Kellams, medical director of the Midtown Community Mental Health Center and chief of psychiatric services at Wishard, echoed Metzger.

“I think every mental health clinic in the state of Indiana ought to have access to a program like this,” he said.

As an example, he pointed to Chaudhary’s hard work in securing Medicaid benefits for a 40-year-old patient, which prevented the difficult situation for Midtown of providing services without reimbursement.

More help

A key part of the Mason Pulliam grant was the inclusion of legal interns into the partnership. For the fall semester, two licensed attorneys who are enrolled in the Master of Laws program at the Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law are working with Chaudhary.

Legal services, by nature, are constant triage, Chaudhary said. The unpaid interns enable him to take a step back and still handle the workload. With the extra help, he now has the ability to spend more time with cases, researching and writing well-crafted letters. Before, he was almost to the point of having to put the Midtown clients on a waiting list.

Aishah Shamsi and Sarah Dunkley have just started interning but have already gained valuable insights.

“I think people wouldn’t realize the effect even the small things can have on a person who has mental health problems,” Shamsi said.

For Shamsi, the MLP internship provides the opportunity to explore the medical industry and, she said, help her find a career path. Her concentration in the LLM program is health care law, an area she is attracted to because she sees the opportunity to make a difference.

Dunkley came to the MLP internship with experience working in mental health services in her native Australia. As an LLM student at McKinney studying international and comparative law, she was directed to the Midtown MLP through the school’s pro bono program.

The internship is allowing her to get a better view of the American legal system than she could get sitting in a classroom, she said.

During the summer months, Chaudhary had two I.U. McKinney School of Law students as interns. They shadowed him, drafted pleadings, did legal research and put together a presentation on advance directives for the Midtown Older Adult Services.

Both Kellams and Metzger see the interns as a natural extension of the partnership. The internship not only provides more help with the workload, it also gives the students valuable real-life experience in talking to clients, assembling the facts and applying the law.

“It’s very exciting to run something like this,” Chaudhary said. “The way I see it, it’s going to rise and fall, depending on how much effort I put into it. That’s a constant motivation here.”•


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Lori, you must really love wedding cake stories like this one ... happy enuf ending for you?

  2. This new language about a warning has not been discussed at previous meetings. It's not available online. Since it must be made public knowledge before the vote, does anyone know exactly what it says? Further, this proposal was held up for 5 weeks because members Carol and Lucy insisted that all terms used be defined. So now, definitions are unnecessary and have not been inserted? Beyond these requirements, what is the logic behind giving one free pass to discriminators? Is that how laws work - break it once and that's ok? Just don't do it again? Three members of Carmel's council have done just about everything they can think of to prohibit an anti-discrimination ordinance in Carmel, much to Brainard's consternation, I'm told. These three 'want to be so careful' that they have failed to do what at least 13 other communities, including Martinsville, have already done. It's not being careful. It's standing in the way of what 60% of Carmel residents want. It's hurting CArmel in thT businesses have refused to locate because the council has not gotten with the program. And now they want to give discriminatory one free shot to do so. Unacceptable. Once three members leave the council because they lost their races, the Carmel council will have unanimous approval of the ordinance as originally drafted, not with a one free shot to discriminate freebie. That happens in January 2016. Why give a freebie when all we have to do is wait 3 months and get an ordinance with teeth from Day 1? If nothing else, can you please get s copy from Carmel and post it so we can see what else has changed in the proposal?

  3. Here is an interesting 2012 law review article for any who wish to dive deeper into this subject matter: Excerpt: "Judicial interpretation of the ADA has extended public entity liability to licensing agencies in the licensure and certification of attorneys.49 State bar examiners have the authority to conduct fitness investigations for the purpose of determining whether an applicant is a direct threat to the public.50 A “direct threat” is defined as “a significant risk to the health or safety of others that cannot be eliminated by a modification of policies, practices or procedures, or by the provision of auxiliary aids or services as provided by § 35.139.”51 However, bar examiners may not utilize generalizations or stereotypes about the applicant’s disability in concluding that an applicant is a direct threat.52"

  4. We have been on the waiting list since 2009, i was notified almost 4 months ago that we were going to start receiving payments and we still have received nothing. Every time I call I'm told I just have to wait it's in the lawyers hands. Is everyone else still waiting?

  5. I hope you dont mind but to answer my question. What amendment does this case pretain to?