After three years of being in charge of the Indiana Board of Law Examiners, a state court staff attorney has resigned, and
the search for a new leader is under way.
The Indiana Supreme Court announced recently that Linda L. Loepker resigned Dec. 6 as executive director of the state’s
BLE, according to public information officer Kathryn Dolan.
Loepker has been in that post since 2007 when she replaced longtime leader Mary Place Godsey who retired after 25 years.
Dolan said that no resignation letter was submitted and she classified Loepker’s leaving as a “personnel matter”
and that any other details beyond her resignation date are confidential.
Loepker
Justice Brent Dickson, who serves as a liaison to the nine-member BLE, said the process for how the court would name a new
executive director was still being established. Notice will go out inviting attorneys to apply for the position, but an exact
timeline for the search had not been established by Indiana Lawyer deadline. Evansville attorney Les Shively, who
serves as chair of the BLE, hopes a new leader can be found early in 2011 as the next bar exam is set for February.
Until a new executive director is found, David Remondini, the chief deputy executive director of the Indiana Division of
State Court Admini-stration, is filling the spot as acting executive director. The interim role doesn’t take away from
Remondini’s existing duties as second-in-charge of the court’s administrative arm, a position he’s held
since February 2007 when he moved from being chief counsel for Indiana Chief Justice Randall T. Shepard.
The state BLE plays a pivotal role in the legal community, overseeing not only the admission of attorneys in Indiana through
the bar exam but also administering legal intern certification and the formation and renewal of professional corporations,
limited liability companies, and limited liability partnerships within the legal profession. The Committee on Character and
Fitness that’s made up of more than 300 lawyers conducts personal interviews of all those applying for the Indiana bar.
Loepker didn’t return a message from Indiana Lawyer, and Dolan said she did not know Loepker’s plans
for the future or how this change might impact her national affiliations with organizations and boards relating to law examiner
issues.
She served at the BLE helm at a time when the board has been under fire from multiple lawsuits targeting the bar exam eligibility
and administration process. At least three suits have been filed in the past two years, and one of the most notable continues
in the Southern District of Indiana, challenging the BLE requirement that bar applicants answer questions about their physical
and mental health information in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act. That case remains pending before Judge
Tanya Walton Pratt. Others have alleged the state and BLE are wrong in referring applicants to the Judges and Lawyers Assistance
Program for questioning and also for barring individuals who have not attended law school from taking the bar exam. Loepker
has been intimately involved in the process as well as the litigation that has gone through state and federal trial and appellate
courts.
Nothing filed on those pending dockets by Dec. 17 refer to Loepker’s resignation in any way, and it’s unclear
at this point whether her departure might impact the timelines and procedures of the process or whether she might need to
re-appear for proceedings at some point in the future.
Dolan credited Loepker with being an instrumental part of the Indiana Supreme Court’s successful effort to secure a
new lease at the 30 S. Meridian building in downtown Indianapolis, where the Division of State Court Administration and many
other court agencies are housed. The previous lease at the National City Center at 115 W. Washington St. expired, and Loepker
negotiated a new lease at a lower cost. It is projected to save state taxpayers nearly $1.5 million over the life of the 10-year
lease that began Jan. 1, 2008.•














vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.
Jack, I was only responding to bill's comment of tying everybody in government together. I agree with you though, it takes one bad apple to ruin the bunch.. As in any profession. What's truly unfair is when somebody violates someone's trust and takes complete advantage of someone
John’s comment is unfair. The majority of attorneys can be trusted. Unfortunately, all it takes is one greedy, unscrupulous, immoral attorney to jade the public.