ILNews

Indiana company brings Jesse Owens to the big screen

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

An Indiana company had a big role in telling the story of one of the most influential track athletes of all time through a recently released movie.

“Race” tells the story of track athlete Jesse Owens, who overcame racism and hatred and became the first American athlete to win four track-and-field gold medals at a single Olympics. What’s more is he did this in 1936 in Berlin, Germany, as Adolf Hitler and the Third Reich were in power.

race-15col.jpgImage courtesy of Luminary Group

Luminary Group, a licensing, consulting and intellectual property management company, had just about as big a role in the way the film turned out as the director and actors in the movie. The Shelbyville company manages the intellectual property rights of Owens, as well as other famous athletes such as Babe Ruth and Satchel Paige in baseball and Johnny Unitas and Vince Lombardi in football.

It was Luminary Group’s job to make sure Owens’ story was told in a way his three daughters, who are now in their 70s, would be proud of. Jonathan Faber, CEO and general counsel of Luminary Group, said that meant plenty of negotiations and meetings.

Pete Enfield, president of Luminary Group, also worked on the project, and said the entire undertaking took five years.

“The production company wanted the family to be intimately involved in the process, and they wanted the story to be told accurately, not to portray him as something he wasn’t,” Enfield said. “That meant finding the right actors and director, and lot of things have to come into place.”

Faber said Luminary Group needs to be well-versed on copyright and trademark laws to protect the character and reputation of its clients.

faber-jonathan-mug.jpg Faber

“The fulcrum point is knowing what an agreement like this should look like,” Faber said. “What is the value of the Owens family’s involvement and blessing, and what vicinity we should be in.”

Faber said that’s where the skill level of the people involved comes into play.

“We’re in the business of making deals work, and that’s certainly at times unflattering,” Faber said. “It’s not objective. We need to make sure the use of the character isn’t problematic.”

Faber declined to get into specifics about what legal challenges were faced in making the movie, but said generally his work involves a lot of expert witness interviews, determining what a character is worth, and finding and prosecuting people who misuse any of their clients in a number of ways.

“We use a lot of the legal skill-set to determine market value of a character,” Faber said. “If there were no market value, there wouldn’t be a need for our character to be protected.”

Part of protecting the Jesse Owens character was finding the right actor to play him, and both Faber and Enfield felt Stephan James was the man to do that. After that, it was finding the correct director and writing team and the proper funding and distribution throughout the process.

“We have to hit all of those benchmarks, and only at that point can we start exchanging drafts of the script. That’s where the rubber met the road and that’s where the family’s knowledge was crucial in bringing the story to life,” Enfield said.

Faber said the group “was certainly holding its breath” during the first showing of the film, but was very pleased with the outcome, as was the family.

“It hits a lot of nerves and it’s timely on a lot of levels,” Faber said. “It’s great to know we did a very good job and we’re happy with the result.”•

ADVERTISEMENT

  • GREAT!!!!
    Oh, Jonathan...I LOVED this movie...always a fan of uplifting, courageous stories and this was one of the best. Congrats on a great job, seeing this vehicle thru to the finish. It appears things are going very well for Luminary. So happy for you; you are the best! Ro P.S. Somebody doesn't know much about the movie biz or intellectual property...I can see your role in this easily.
  • Congrats!
    Congrats! Great movie
  • This sounds like a fake
    This sounds like a fake statement. The movie from what I read was an independent project brought to the Owens family.. Never would a lawyer have the say in the director or the actors..

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Where may I find an attorney working Pro Bono? Many issues with divorce, my Disability, distribution of IRA's, property, money's and pressured into agreement by my attorney. Leaving me far less than 5% of all after 15 years of marriage. No money to appeal, disabled living on disability income. Attorney's decision brought forward to judge, no evidence ever to finalize divorce. Just 2 weeks ago. Please help.

  2. For the record no one could answer the equal protection / substantive due process challenge I issued in the first post below. The lawless and accountable only to power bureaucrats never did either. All who interface with the Indiana law examiners or JLAP be warned.

  3. Hi there I really need help with getting my old divorce case back into court - I am still paying support on a 24 year old who has not been in school since age 16 - now living independent. My visitation with my 14 year old has never been modified; however, when convenient for her I can have him... I am paying past balance from over due support, yet earn several thousand dollars less. I would contact my original attorney but he basically molest me multiple times in Indy when I would visit.. Todd Woodmansee - I had just came out and had know idea what to do... I have heard he no longer practices. Please help1

  4. Yes diversity is so very important. With justice Rucker off ... the court is too white. Still too male. No Hispanic justice. No LGBT justice. And there are other checkboxes missing as well. This will not do. I say hold the seat until a physically handicapped Black Lesbian of Hispanic heritage and eastern religious creed with bipolar issues can be located. Perhaps an international search, with a preference for third world candidates, is indicated. A non English speaker would surely increase our diversity quotient!!!

  5. First, I want to thank Justice Rucker for his many years of public service, not just at the appellate court level for over 25 years, but also when he served the people of Lake County as a Deputy Prosecutor, City Attorney for Gary, IN, and in private practice in a smaller, highly diverse community with a history of serious economic challenges, ethnic tensions, and recently publicized but apparently long-standing environmental health risks to some of its poorest residents. Congratulations for having the dedication & courage to practice law in areas many in our state might have considered too dangerous or too poor at different points in time. It was also courageous to step into a prominent and highly visible position of public service & respect in the early 1990's, remaining in a position that left you open to state-wide public scrutiny (without any glitches) for over 25 years. Yes, Hoosiers of all backgrounds can take pride in your many years of public service. But people of color who watched your ascent to the highest levels of state government no doubt felt even more as you transcended some real & perhaps some perceived social, economic, academic and professional barriers. You were living proof that, with hard work, dedication & a spirit of public service, a person who shared their same skin tone or came from the same county they grew up in could achieve great success. At the same time, perhaps unknowingly, you helped fellow members of the judiciary, court staff, litigants and the public better understand that differences that are only skin-deep neither define nor limit a person's character, abilities or prospects in life. You also helped others appreciate that people of different races & backgrounds can live and work together peacefully & productively for the greater good of all. Those are truths that didn't have to be written down in court opinions. Anyone paying attention could see that truth lived out every day you devoted to public service. I believe you have been a "trailblazer" in Indiana's legal community and its judiciary. I also embrace your belief that society's needs can be better served when people in positions of governmental power reflect the many complexions of the population that they serve. Whether through greater understanding across the existing racial spectrum or through the removal of some real and some perceived color-based, hope-crushing barriers to life opportunities & success, movement toward a more reflective representation of the population being governed will lead to greater and uninterrupted respect for laws designed to protect all peoples' rights to life, liberty & the pursuit of happiness. Thanks again for a job well-done & for the inevitable positive impact your service has had - and will continue to have - on countless Hoosiers of all backgrounds & colors.

ADVERTISEMENT