November 16, 2009
Jennifer NelsonIn a matter of first impression, the Indiana Court of Appeals decided today that a summary judgment granting insurance policies
isn't equivalent to a money judgment that would allow for 8 percent post-judgment interest.
More
November 13, 2009
Jennifer NelsonAn Indiana trial court erred when it denied a defendant's motion to suppress evidence because the good-faith exception
doesn't apply in this case, the Indiana Court of Appeals concluded today.
More
November 13, 2009
IL StaffAs a part of its "Appeals on Wheels" initiative, a panel of Indiana Court of Appeals judges will visit St. Mary-of-the-Woods
College Nov. 17 to hear arguments in a medical malpractice suit.
More
November 12, 2009
Jennifer NelsonMore than a year after the 2008 presidential election, the Indiana Court of Appeals ruled that Sens. John McCain and Barack
Obama were eligible to run for the office.
More
November 10, 2009
Jennifer NelsonA trial court didn't abuse its discretion in admitting evidence that a juvenile possessed marijuana because the seizure
of the drug didn't violate the teen's constitutional rights, the Indiana Court of Appeals ruled.
More
November 10, 2009
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Court of Appeals used a decision today to clarify that when a nonmoving party has received an enlargement of time
pursuant to Indiana Trial Rule 56(I), any response must be made within the additional time period granted by the trial court.
More
November 9, 2009
Jennifer NelsonThe opening of an ajar car door by a police officer during a foot chase with a suspected robber didn't violate the man's
federal or state constitutional rights, the Indiana Court of Appeals concluded today.
More
November 9, 2009
Jennifer NelsonA trial court didn't abuse its discretion in denying a mistrial after learning a juror asked the state's firearms
expert a question outside the courtroom during a recess in the trial, the Indiana Court of Appeals ruled.
More
November 6, 2009
Jennifer NelsonBecause the trial court erred in finding a defendant waived his right to have a jury hear the enhancement aspects of his drunk-driving
case, the Indiana Court of Appeals reversed his elevated conviction.
More
November 4, 2009
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Court of Appeals overturned a conviction of maintaining a common nuisance because the state failed to prove the
defendant used his car to keep marijuana.
More
November 3, 2009
Jennifer NelsonEven though the Hamilton Superior Court erred in concluding it was the proper venue for a felony child solicitation charge,
the error doesn't warrant an acquittal of the conviction, the Indiana Court of Appeals concluded today. The case was remanded
for retrial in the proper venue of Madison County.
More
October 30, 2009
Jennifer NelsonThe use of a YouTube video during closing arguments as a demonstrative aid by the state warrants a reversal of a robbery
conviction because it may have prejudiced the jury, the Indiana Court of Appeals ruled today.
More
October 30, 2009
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Court of Appeals determined today for the first time that post-retirement health insurance premiums paid by a
former employer aren't a marital asset subject to a division.
More
October 30, 2009
Michael HoskinsAn Indiana casino cannot stop someone from playing regulated blackjack simply because he counts cards, the Indiana Court of
Appeals ruled today.
More
October 29, 2009
Jennifer NelsonAn insurance company isn't allowed to substitute another party's name in a suit filed by a driver for her underinsured
motorist benefits because there's no authority for substitution of a non-party before a jury in a contract case, the Indiana
Court of Appeals decided today. Doing so would create a "legal fiction" before the jury.
More
October 29, 2009
IL StaffA panel of Indiana Court of Appeals judges heads north Friday to hear arguments to determine whether the trial court abused
its discretion in ordering the defendant to serve the remainder of his sentence in prison after he violated home detention
rules.
More
October 28, 2009
Jennifer NelsonA trial court didn't clearly err when it dismissed drunk driving charges against a defendant as sanctions for the state's
discovery violations, the Indiana Court of Appeals concluded today.
More
October 27, 2009
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Court of Appeals affirmed the denial of certification of a proposed class suing the Family and Social Services
Administration because plaintiffs believed the modernized public benefits program system has a disparate impact on people
with disabilities. Even though the contract with the company providing the system was terminated earlier this month, the parties
don't claim this action alters their appeal.
More
October 27, 2009
IL StaffThe Indiana Court of Appeals will hear arguments at Vincennes University Thursday in a case that seeks to determine who is
responsible to pay costs and expenses related to environmental contamination.
More
October 23, 2009
Jennifer NelsonThe "prison mailbox rule," which the Indiana Court of Appeals had previously determined applies in post-conviction
proceedings, also is applicable in direct appeals, the appellate court decided today.
More
October 23, 2009
IL StaffThe Indiana Court of Appeals travels to Oxford Tuesday to hear arguments in a drug case.
More
October 21, 2009
Jennifer NelsonA trial court erred when it sua sponte decided to exclude evidence from a warrantless search of a defendant's car and
dismiss the drug charges against him as a result of that search, the Indiana Court of Appeals ruled today.
More
October 20, 2009
Jennifer NelsonThe premature destruction of a tape of a guilty plea hearing by court staff doesn't render the record silent for purposes
of Boykin, the Indiana Court of Appeals ruled Monday.
More
October 15, 2009
IL StaffThe Indiana Court of Appeals travels to Terre Haute Oct. 19 to hear arguments in an interlocutory appeal of a drug case in
which the defendant claims the trial court abused its discretion in denying her motion to suppress.
More
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.
Jack, I was only responding to bill's comment of tying everybody in government together. I agree with you though, it takes one bad apple to ruin the bunch.. As in any profession. What's truly unfair is when somebody violates someone's trust and takes complete advantage of someone
John’s comment is unfair. The majority of attorneys can be trusted. Unfortunately, all it takes is one greedy, unscrupulous, immoral attorney to jade the public.