Indiana law schools prepare for pomp and circumstance

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Graduation season is beginning with law schools around Indiana hosting ceremonies the next two weekends in May.

Included in the 2016 celebrations will be the first class to graduate from Indiana Tech Law School in Fort Wayne. The class of 19 will receive degrees at the institute’s main graduation ceremony at 10:30 a.m. May 14 in the Allen County War Memorial Coliseum. Afterward, the J.D. graduates will enjoy a reception in their honor at the law school.

Also graduating May 14 will be students from Notre Dame Law School and Valparaiso University Law School.

At Notre Dame, graduates will be honored during the Prize Day awards ceremony at 1 p.m.  May 13. The diploma and hooding ceremony will be at 12:30 p.m. May 14 at the Hesburgh Library Reflecting Pool. A total of 172 will receive their JDs and 27 will receive LLMs.

Per tradition, the recipient of the distinguished teaching award will be the commencement speaker. The Class of 2016 chose Amy Coney Barrett, who teaches classes on the federal courts, constitutional law and statutory interpretation. A graduate of Notre Dame Law School, Barrett clerked for Judge Laurence Silberman of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit and for the late Associate Justice Antonin Scalia of the U.S. Supreme Court. She also was an associate at Miller Cassidy Larroca & Lewin in Washington, D.C.

Commencement ceremonies for Valparaiso law graduates are scheduled for 10 a.m. (CST) at the University Chapel with 156 students to receive their degrees.

Illinois Supreme Court Justice Mary Jane Theis will be the speaker. A graduate of the University of San Francisco School of Law, Theis has spent her entire legal career in Illinois. She began as an assistant public defender in Cook County before being appointed as associate judge in the Circuit Court of Cook County. From there, she went on to serve at every level of the judiciary in the state of Illinois, including 17 years on the Appellate Court where she served as presiding judge.

Indiana University Maurer School of Law and Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law will hold their graduation ceremonies May 7.

IU McKinney’s commencement will begin at 6 p.m. in the Sagamore Ballroom of the Indiana Convention Center. Former Indiana Attorney General Pamela Carter will deliver the commencement address. A 1984 graduate of IU McKinney, Carter was the first African-American woman elected as a state attorney general in the nation and the first African-American to serve as Cummins’ chief legal officer and corporate secretary.    

IU McKinney Dean Andrew Klein and the alumni association will host a reception for the Class of 2016 from 6 to 9 p.m. May 6 at the Indianapolis Museum of Art.

IU Maurer will hold graduation at 3 p.m. in the IU Auditorium on the Bloomington campus. A total of 193 students will receive JD degrees  (which includes 12 joint degree students) and 63 will receive LLMs.

University of Washington School of Law Dean Kellye Testy will be commencement speaker. A 1991 graduate of IU Maurer, Testy clerked for the late Judge Jesse Eschbach of the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals and practiced privately at Kirkland & Ellis in Chicago and New York as well as the former Ice Miller Donadio & Ryan in Indianapolis.

Also, Class of 2016 members Jonathan Brown and Sora Erdem will make brief remarks during the commencement. Finally, graduate Jade La Croix will present the class’s gift to the law school which will be a pledge to the school’s capital campaign.

IU Maurer will host a graduate party for the Class of 2016 from 8 to 11 p.m. May 6 in the Jerome Hall Law Library.  



Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. @BryanJBrown, You are totally correct. I have no words, you nailed it.....

  2. You have not overstated the reality of the present situation. The government inquisitor in my case, who demanded that I, on the record, to choose between obedience to God's law or man's law, remains on the BLE, even an officer of the BLE, and was recently renewed in her contract for another four years. She has a long history in advancing LGBQT rights. THINK WITH ME: What if a currently serving BLE officer or analogous court official (ie discplinary officer) asked an atheist to affirm the Existence, or demanded a transsexual to undergo a mental evaluation to probe his/her alleged mindcrime? That would end a career. The double standard is glaring, see the troubling question used to ban me for life from the Ind bar right here: (see page 8 of 21) Again, what if I had been a homosexual rights activist before law school rather than a prolife activist? A gay rights activist after law school admitted to the SCOTUS and Kansas since 1996, without discipline? A homosexual rights activist who had argued before half the federal appellate courts in the country? I am pretty certain that had I been that LGBQT activist, and not a pro-life activist, my passing of the Indiana bar exam would have rendered me an Indiana attorney .... rather than forever banished. So yes, there is a glaring double standard. And some are even beyond the reach of constitutional and statutory protections. I was.

  3. Historically speaking pagans devalue children and worship animals. How close are we? Consider the ruling above plus today's tidbit from the politically correct high Court:

  4. The father is a convicted of spousal abuse. 2 restaining orders been put on him, never made any difference the whole time she was there. The time he choked the mother she dropped the baby the police were called. That was the only time he was taken away. The mother was suppose to have been notified when he was released no call was ever made. He made his way back, kicked the door open and terrified the mother. She ran down the hallway and locked herself and the baby in the bathroom called 911. The police came and said there was nothing they could do (the policeman was a old friend from highschool, good ole boy thing).They told her he could burn the place down as long as she wasn't in it.The mother got another resataining order, the judge told her if you were my daughter I would tell you to leave. So she did. He told her "If you ever leave me I will make your life hell, you don't know who your f!@#$%^ with". The fathers other 2 grown children from his 1st exwife havent spoke 1 word to him in almost 15yrs not 1 word.This is what will be a forsure nightmare for this little girl who is in the hands of pillar of the community. Totally corrupt system. Where I come from I would be in jail not only for that but non payment of child support. Unbelievably pitiful...

  5. dsm 5 indicates that a lot of kids with gender dysphoria grow out of it. so is it really a good idea to encourage gender reassignment? Perhaps that should wait for the age of majority. I don't question the compassionate motives of many of the trans-advocates, but I do question their wisdom. Likewise, they should not question the compassion of those whose potty policies differ. too often, any opposition to the official GLBT agenda is instantly denounced as "homophobia" etc.