ILNews

Indiana Lawyer launches ‘Lawyers on the Move’ email

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

EidtPerspLucas-sigWhen you are part of a media staff, it seems that you are constantly trying to get into the head of the reader. What will draw you in and keep you coming back for more?

One thing we know for sure is that lawyers like reading about other lawyers. Most of our data on this is anecdotal – conversations with subscribers often reveal that our Supreme Court disciplinary action report, followed closely by On the Move and other features about the people in the profession, are one of the first things many turn to when receiving their new Indiana Lawyer. Reader surveys have confirmed the popularity of “people” news among our readers.

As electronic delivery of news continues to increase in popularity, we continue to look for the best ways to deliver the news you want in the way you want it. In February, Indiana Lawyer will launch a new email we are calling “Lawyers on the Move.”

This email, which will be sent biweekly to all IL daily email subscribers, will feature partnership announcements, associate hires, lateral moves, awards and honors, elections and promotions, and other professional news from Indiana’s legal community. It will include lawyer profiles, columns and stories that acquaint you with people throughout the state and provide information you can use in the practice of law.

If you are already receiving our daily email, you need to do nothing more. Our “In This Issue” email is delivered on the Wednesday that a new issue of Indiana Lawyer is published, and Lawyers on the Move will be delivered to your inbox on Wednesdays that fall between publication dates. Like the IL daily and In This Issue, Lawyers on the Move is a free email service.

If you are not on our email list, you can sign up today. Visit www.theindianalawyer.com and scroll down to the “Indiana Lawyer Newsletters – Sign Up Now!” box on the right side of the homepage. Check the appropriate boxes and enter your name and email address. It is as simple as that.

While signing up for Lawyers on the Move, I encourage you to try other Indiana Lawyer email products. (Did I mention that subscribing is free?) Reader surveys reveal that 98 percent of IL daily email subscribers consider this email their primary source or one of their most important sources of legal news.

The staff of Indiana Lawyer is excited about the opportunity to bring you another means of staying in-the-know and maintaining connections with lawyers throughout the state. As always, your suggestions and feedback are encouraged and appreciated. Contact me at 317-472-5233 or klucas@ibj.com.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. It appears the police and prosecutors are allowed to change the rules halfway through the game to suit themselves. I am surprised that the congress has not yet eliminated the right to a trial in cases involving any type of forensic evidence. That would suit their foolish law and order police state views. I say we eliminate the statute of limitations for crimes committed by members of congress and other government employees. Of course they would never do that. They are all corrupt cowards!!!

  2. Poor Judge Brown probably thought that by slavishly serving the godz of the age her violations of 18th century concepts like due process and the rule of law would be overlooked. Mayhaps she was merely a Judge ahead of her time?

  3. in a lawyer discipline case Judge Brown, now removed, was presiding over a hearing about a lawyer accused of the supposedly heinous ethical violation of saying the words "Illegal immigrant." (IN re Barker) http://www.in.gov/judiciary/files/order-discipline-2013-55S00-1008-DI-429.pdf .... I wonder if when we compare the egregious violations of due process by Judge Brown, to her chiding of another lawyer for politically incorrectness, if there are any conclusions to be drawn about what kind of person, what kind of judge, what kind of apparatchik, is busy implementing the agenda of political correctness and making off-limits legit advocacy about an adverse party in a suit whose illegal alien status is relevant? I am just asking the question, the reader can make own conclsuion. Oh wait-- did I use the wrong adjective-- let me rephrase that, um undocumented alien?

  4. of course the bigger questions of whether or not the people want to pay for ANY bussing is off limits, due to the Supreme Court protecting the people from DEMOCRACY. Several decades hence from desegregation and bussing plans and we STILL need to be taking all this taxpayer money to combat mostly-imagined "discrimination" in the most obviously failed social program of the postwar period.

  5. You can put your photos anywhere you like... When someone steals it they know it doesn't belong to them. And, a man getting a divorce is automatically not a nice guy...? That's ridiculous. Since when is need of money a conflict of interest? That would mean that no one should have a job unless they are already financially solvent without a job... A photographer is also under no obligation to use a watermark (again, people know when a photo doesn't belong to them) or provide contact information. Hey, he didn't make it easy for me to pay him so I'll just take it! Well heck, might as well walk out of the grocery store with a cart full of food because the lines are too long and you don't find that convenient. "Only in Indiana." Oh, now you're passing judgement on an entire state... What state do you live in? I need to characterize everyone in your state as ignorant and opinionated. And the final bit of ignorance; assuming a photo anyone would want is lucky and then how much does your camera have to cost to make it a good photo, in your obviously relevant opinion?

ADVERTISEMENT