ILNews

Indiana makes gains in permanent placement

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Danielle Pierson was 6 years old when she and her siblings became part of Indiana’s foster care system. Over the next 12 years, she moved from home to home – sometimes returning to live with her mother for brief periods – until she turned 18 and aged out of foster care.

Now 27, Pierson is a guardian ad litem for Child Advocates Inc. In her role, she helps children who have been removed from their homes cope with the confusion and fear that accompanies life in foster care.

“Once you go into foster care you already have the feeling of something is wrong … a lot of our kids have that feeling of: nobody wants me,” she said. “After a few years, you have no other reason to believe anyone wants you.”

Planting roots

Growing up, Pierson lived in different foster homes in Indianapolis and changed schools almost every year until the time she reached high school. It’s that kind of upheaval that the Indiana Department of Child Services is working to prevent, making “permanency” for children a priority – whether that means reunification with parents, adoption, guardianship, or, for older teens, independent living.

Child welfare advocates understand that once children enter foster care, it’s important to find a safe, permanent home for them as quickly as possible – no one wants children to be shuffled from home to home or to wait indefinitely for a place to live.
 

dunn-leslie-mug Dunn

Leslie Dunn, Indiana state director for GAL/CASA, explained that children have different perceptions of time.

“As an adult, I don’t think Christmas is too far away,” she said. “If you tell a child it’s three months away, to them, that’s forever. You might as well say it’s five years, because it’s not anytime soon – that’s a long time for them. And I think if you’re not at home and not with your toys and your friends, it’s a long time to be away.”

The federal Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System shows that in 2010, Indiana ranked third nationwide in achieving overall permanency for children who have entered foster care and second nationwide in arranging adoptions. Part of the reason those figures have improved is that the DCS has CHINS defbegun working harder to place children in relatives’ homes. Dunn said that the DCS has recently begun devoting more energy to finding absentee fathers, in particular. But sometimes, she said, mothers may not know who the father is, or may be reluctant to provide his name.

“It used to be, we’d ask Mom, and she’d say I don’t know, and we’d leave it at that,” Dunn said. “Now, we ask grandparents: do you know who Dad is? We have to push further than that and really try to find them, because it’s a whole side of the family.”

Dave Judkins, deputy director of field operations for DCS, said the department will continue to focus on finding fathers.

“It’s not necessarily just because we want that father to have the child, because maybe that father is not appropriate, but you don’t find out about any of that unless you make an effort to find out,” he said.

Judkins said that extended family – even newly discovered relatives on the father’s side – may be more receptive than foster families to accept siblings into their homes. And as DCS continues to locate distant family, the percentage of siblings being placed together is increasing.

DCS’s March 2011 Safely Home-Families First quarterly data report, which measures data annually through March of each year, shows that in 2008, 16.44 percent of children were placed in relatives’ homes. That number had climbed to 25.57 percent as of March 31 this year. Siblings placed together also increased, with 65.69 percent being placed together in 2008, and 71.9 percent being placed together in 2011. But, Judkins said, while the data seems to indicate a step in the right direction, certain factors may distort statistics.
CHINSplacement
Dunn explained that sometimes, the reason siblings aren’t placed together is that one or more of the children is placed in a residential facility for treatment of behavioral problems, disability, or criminal behavior. In general, it may be difficult for foster families to meet all the needs of all the children. “If you have a large family, and some of them have real issues, it’s very difficult to find a foster family to take five children,” she said.

Pierson recalled that she tended to be placed together with her younger brother more frequently than she was placed with her other brother and sister.

Meeting goals

During the first six months a child is in foster care, Dunn explained, the immediate goal is reunification with parents, if possible.

“You aim for permanency at six months – you hope the case is going to be over by then – but sometimes cases go on for much longer,” she said. “But you need to give parents time to address their problems.”

DCS has programs that help parents develop the skills they need to take care of their children. Father engagement workshops, substance abuse counseling, and domestic violence intervention are some of the initiatives DCS has undertaken in an effort to reunite families. But those efforts aren’t always effective, particularly if parents aren’t actively trying to correct their problem behaviors.

“The vast majority of the time, you have six months to work with the family, to see progress, and then you need to decide what path you’re going to take,” Dunn said.

After six months, the DCS can file for involuntary termination of parental rights if it determines that’s what would be best for the child. Often, in TPR cases, a caseworker may sense that TPR is imminent when the parents either don’t care to visit the child or aren’t working toward agreed-upon goals, Dunn said.

While Indiana has improved in finding permanent homes for children, Judkins believes it can do better.

“There’s a tendency for kids – not just in Indiana, but nationwide – for the kid to get stuck in the system,” Judkins said. Pierson, having lived that reality, wants to do whatever she can to prevent other children from being stuck in limbo.

In 2009, Pierson created Foster Youth Connection of Indiana, an advocacy group that she hopes will make legislators more aware of the problems children face in foster care. She is especially concerned about young people who spend their childhoods in foster care and age out with no real sense of direction or belonging.

“I think that one of the biggest plans for me is permanency and ensuring that we have that plan early on instead of waiting until the last minute,” she said.

Pierson – when she was about 16 or 17 – moved in with her high school English teacher. Her teacher, she said, is who helped her figure out the skills she needed to succeed on her own, and what she wanted to do with her life. Pierson ended up going to college and graduating from Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis with a bachelor’s degree in sociology.

“I still have a relationship with my family and extended family; my relationship with my family isn’t the best,” she said. “We all took different types of paths.”•
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • my children's rights
    Who should I contact if my children's civil rights were violated by DSS, law enforcement and others in their case?

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. "So we broke with England for the right to "off" our preborn progeny at will, and allow the processing plant doing the dirty deeds (dirt cheap) to profit on the marketing of those "products of conception." I was completely maleducated on our nation's founding, it would seem. (But I know the ACLU is hard at work to remedy that, too.)" Well, you know, we're just following in the footsteps of our founders who raped women, raped slaves, raped children, maimed immigrants, sold children, stole property, broke promises, broke apart families, killed natives... You know, good God fearing down home Christian folk! :/

  2. Who gives a rats behind about all the fluffy ranking nonsense. What students having to pay off debt need to know is that all schools aren't created equal and students from many schools don't have a snowball's chance of getting a decent paying job straight out of law school. Their lowly ranked lawschool won't tell them that though. When schools start honestly (accurately) reporting *those numbers, things will get interesting real quick, and the looks on student's faces will be priceless!

  3. Whilst it may be true that Judges and Justices enjoy such freedom of time and effort, it certainly does not hold true for the average working person. To say that one must 1) take a day or a half day off work every 3 months, 2) gather a list of information including recent photographs, and 3) set up a time that is convenient for the local sheriff or other such office to complete the registry is more than a bit near-sighted. This may be procedural, and hence, in the near-sighted minds of the court, not 'punishment,' but it is in fact 'punishment.' The local sheriffs probably feel a little punished too by the overwork. Registries serve to punish the offender whilst simultaneously providing the public at large with a false sense of security. The false sense of security is dangerous to the public who may not exercise due diligence by thinking there are no offenders in their locale. In fact, the registry only informs them of those who have been convicted.

  4. Unfortunately, the court doesn't understand the difference between ebidta and adjusted ebidta as they clearly got the ruling wrong based on their misunderstanding

  5. A common refrain in the comments on this website comes from people who cannot locate attorneys willing put justice over retainers. At the same time the judiciary threatens to make pro bono work mandatory, seemingly noting the same concern. But what happens to attorneys who have the chumptzah to threatened the legal status quo in Indiana? Ask Gary Welch, ask Paul Ogden, ask me. Speak truth to power, suffer horrendously accordingly. No wonder Hoosier attorneys who want to keep in good graces merely chase the dollars ... the powers that be have no concerns as to those who are ever for sale to the highest bidder ... for those even willing to compromise for $$$ never allow either justice or constitutionality to cause them to stand up to injustice or unconstitutionality. And the bad apples in the Hoosier barrel, like this one, just keep rotting.

ADVERTISEMENT