The Indiana Office of Guardian Ad Litem/Court Appointed Special Advocate is one of 16 programs in the National CASA Association
that will use a pilot program to help young adults leaving foster care.
The Indiana GAL/CASA office was awarded a $75,000 grant in March by the National CASA Association to help launch Fostering
Futures, a program that will engage GAL and CASA volunteers as advocates and advisors for foster youth ages 14 to 21. The
volunteers will help the youth identify supportive adult connections and develop specific plans for making a successful transition
from foster care to becoming an independent adult.
The risks for young adults leaving foster care without a permanent family include homelessness, unemployment, and substance
abuse.
National CASA Association CEO Michael Piraino said the organization selected Indiana’s office because of its strong
commitment to working with youth as they transition out of foster care.
Representatives from the state office attended training programs in April and early June. Leslie Dunn, Indiana State Director
of GAL/CASA, said the office is in the process of rolling out the program. They notified CASA directors around the state about
the program and asked for volunteers who would like to work with older youth. The state office has close to 100 volunteers.
Dunn said last week they held an overview training of the pilot program for staff and CASA program directors who have volunteers
participating in Fostering Futures. Volunteers will be trained in August through five sessions in Anderson, Columbus, Evansville,
Indianapolis, and South Bend.
She said the state office will monitor the progress of the volunteers’ work with the youth at least through the grant
term, which ends in March 2011.
The Wal-Mart Foundation helped begin the national program in 2009 by donating $1.6 million to the National CASA Association.














The court of appeals not only tries to rewrite or interpret the law to suit their fancy, now they choose play stupid as well. Every consideration must be given to pro se litigants, who are not held to the same standards as attorneys, as stated by,SCOTUS. I assume they didn't have a lawyer, since one wasn't mentioned and I strongly suggest thatb the rest of the, origional petitioners get back in there and fight for their rights.
the irony of situations like this is that the clients whom conour cheated are the ones who should be pulling hardest for him to remain free and keep his law license, so they have some hopes of him paying back. really bury the guy deep and then there will be little hope of restitution
Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.