ILNews

Indiana's inheritance tax phasing out

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indiana Legislature passed a law during the 2012 session that will gradually phase out the state’s inheritance tax by allowing a credit against the amount of taxes owed.

The initial credit, beginning on July 1, will be 10 percent in 2013 and will increase by 10 percent each fiscal year, reaching 90 percent in 2021, and 100 percent in 2022. The new law also expands the definition of a Class A transferee to include the spouse, widow or widower of the transferor’s child or stepchild. That means people included in the expanded transferee category will be entitled to the same exemptions and lower tax rates that a transferor’s children enjoy.

R.J. McConnell, a partner at Bose McKinney & Evans who is also a member of the estate and wealth management group, explained that the expanded Class A category won’t necessarily change how people plan their estates overall, but it may be important for some families.

mcconnell McConnell

“The good news is, if a family wants to leave money and treat kids and stepchildren the same, they not only receive the same treatment from their parents, but they receive the same treatment from the government,” McConnell said. “I think it’s a wonderful remedy, in the interest of fairness.”

Benefits for those left behind

Beginning this year, the exemption for Class A beneficiaries was raised to $250,000, meaning that each child of a transferee can inherit $250,000 tax-free.

So far, clients aren’t banging at the door to revise their estate plans based on the changes in Indiana law.

Jeanne Longsworth, of the Fort Wayne firm Longsworth Law, concentrates her practice on wealth transfer, estate planning and associated areas of law.

“It’s way too early. I don’t think the general population understands what the phase-out is … the phase-out is over a nine-year period of time,” she said. “I haven’t had anybody coming in and saying, ‘Let’s rethink this.’”

She said that the most present concern for her clients is the federal estate tax.

“I would say for the majority of clients I work with, the federal tax is the really burdensome one because of the rates,” she said.

Currently, federal law taxes estates at 35 percent, with the first $5 million exempt from taxation. But that is likely to change soon.

“All that goes out the window on January 1 if Congress doesn’t do something,” McConnell said. Without intervention, the exempt amount will be $1 million, and the tax rate will revert to 55 percent, as it was in 2001.

“It’s a train wreck – particularly for families with illiquid assets like farmland or businesses,” McConnell said. “The $5 million exempts from tax 98.5 percent of all Americans. But there are a lot of families whose estate, whose business, whose farm ground is exempt from tax today, but would be subject to tax in January if the exemption goes down to $1 million. It would just be a huge unfairness.”

Protecting assets from penalties

The fact that 2012 is an election year causes further questions about whether the federal estate tax law may change. Some wealthy parents are therefore choosing to make lifetime gifts to their beneficiaries this year rather than run the risk that their estates will be subject to a much higher tax rate in the future. This year, the gift tax exemption is $5 million.

McConnell said the concept of portability will also disappear in 2013 without legislative intervention.

“Portability says that if you don’t use the entire exemption in the estate of the first to die, it’s portable and can be used in the second estate – meaning, that if dad did nothing, mom would have $10 million of exemption portability.”

That means that the mother would then be able to pass on to her children that entire $10 million tax-free.

Before the change in Indiana’s inheritance tax law, families leaving property to heirs had to weigh the pros and cons of paying inheritance tax early, at a lower rate, or risking a greater tax penalty for heirs, should the property continue to go up in value. Now, knowing that the inheritance tax is fading away, that’s no longer a concern.

“It’s basically kicking the can down the road until presumably the tax is gone,” McConnell said.•

ADVERTISEMENT

  • unnecessary
    This was an unnecessary change in law, a needless fiddling with a tax that impacted very very few hoosiers, but one that erodes a tax base benefitting very many hoosiers. Just because some people wanted to chalk up a "tax cut" on their legislative brag-list, and didnt give a fig about replacing the revenue any other way. Really stupid. I am a republican my whole life and this just shames me like hell. I have to use a fake name over this because I know my fellow republicans are all brain washed over tax cutting too.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Indianapolis employers harassment among minorities AFRICAN Americans needs to be discussed the metro Indianapolis area is horrible when it comes to harassing African American employees especially in the local healthcare facilities. Racially profiling in the workplace is an major issue. Please make it better because I'm many civil rights leaders would come here and justify that Indiana is a state the WORKS only applies to Caucasian Americans especially in Hamilton county. Indiana targets African Americans in the workplace so when governor pence is trying to convince people to vote for him this would be awesome publicity for the Presidency Elections.

  2. Wishing Mary Willis only God's best, and superhuman strength, as she attempts to right a ship that too often strays far off course. May she never suffer this personal affect, as some do who attempt to change a broken system: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QojajMsd2nE

  3. Indiana's seatbelt law is not punishable as a crime. It is an infraction. Apparently some of our Circuit judges have deemed settled law inapplicable if it fails to fit their litmus test of political correctness. Extrapolating to redefine terms of behavior in a violation of immigration law to the entire body of criminal law leaves a smorgasbord of opportunity for judicial mischief.

  4. I wonder if $10 diversions for failure to wear seat belts are considered moral turpitude in federal immigration law like they are under Indiana law? Anyone know?

  5. What a fine article, thank you! I can testify firsthand and by detailed legal reports (at end of this note) as to the dire consequences of rejecting this truth from the fine article above: "The inclusion and expansion of this right [to jury] in Indiana’s Constitution is a clear reflection of our state’s intention to emphasize the importance of every Hoosier’s right to make their case in front of a jury of their peers." Over $20? Every Hoosier? Well then how about when your very vocation is on the line? How about instead of a jury of peers, one faces a bevy of political appointees, mini-czars, who care less about due process of the law than the real czars did? Instead of trial by jury, trial by ideological ordeal run by Orwellian agents? Well that is built into more than a few administrative law committees of the Ind S.Ct., and it is now being weaponized, as is revealed in articles posted at this ezine, to root out post moderns heresies like refusal to stand and pledge allegiance to all things politically correct. My career was burned at the stake for not so saluting, but I think I was just one of the early logs. Due, at least in part, to the removal of the jury from bar admission and bar discipline cases, many more fires will soon be lit. Perhaps one awaits you, dear heretic? Oh, at that Ind. article 12 plank about a remedy at law for every damage done ... ah, well, the founders evidently meant only for those damages done not by the government itself, rabid statists that they were. (Yes, that was sarcasm.) My written reports available here: Denied petition for cert (this time around): http://tinyurl.com/zdmawmw Denied petition for cert (from the 2009 denial and five year banishment): http://tinyurl.com/zcypybh Related, not written by me: Amicus brief: http://tinyurl.com/hvh7qgp

ADVERTISEMENT