Indiana Supreme Court offices on the move

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
move-15col.jpg Judicial administration staff will move later this year from current space at 30 S. Meridian Street (left) to the Capital Center. (IL Photos/Dave Stafford)

Indiana’s restructured Office of Judicial Administration will get new digs at a lower cost later this year, officials said.

The agencies of the Indiana Supreme Court that oversee state court functions will move from current rented space in the Kite Realty Group Building at 30 S. Meridian St. in downtown Indianapolis to the Capital Center South Tower at 201 N. Illinois St. “We are saving money moving, and this puts us closer to the Statehouse,” said Supreme Court spokeswoman Kathryn Dolan.

“We were nearing the end of our 10-year lease with 30 South, and that prompted us to explore our options going forward,” said Office of Judicial Administration Chief Administrative Officer Mary Willis. “We consider it a very nice location for us for the next 10 years.”

willis-mary-mug.jpg Willis

Court staff will begin moving into the new offices in mid-December, and the transition is expected to be completed no later than early January. A lease at Capital Center was signed earlier this year.

The new location is only about a block-and-a-half from the Statehouse, compared with the current space that’s about three blocks away. The roughly 185 workers moving to the new location, though, will lose the wintertime luxury they now have of an indoor or underground walk connecting administrative offices with the Capitol complex.

Brenda Rodeheffer, general counsel for personnel and operations for the OJA, said the move will save the state millions over the course of the new 10-year lease. She said the courts began shopping for new space last August because the lease is up at the end of this year. Court officials looked at six properties, including the current location, before deciding on Capital Center. Leased space costs over the next 10 years are expected to be about $10 million, she said.

Supreme Court outreach coordinator Sarah Kidwell said the court paid almost $13.8 million over the term of its current lease. “We are in the position of paying $3,817,063.41 less for the next 10 years,” she said in an email.

Willis said department managers were able to tour the new space and make sure it met needs, but some remodeling to reconfigure existing layouts will be required before the move. “Even with modest growth over the next 10 years, we wanted to have departments organized in a way that would work best for us,” she said.

The court administration division will occupy about 60,000 square feet on several floors of the Capital Center, compared to space on just two floors of the current location. Court offices will take part of floor five, technology groups will occupy floor seven, court services will take floor eight, and new administrative offices will be on the 16th floor.

In addition to cost and proximity to the Capitol, Rodeheffer said a key consideration for a new office location was adequate conference space for frequent court committee meetings and training sessions. She said the new location has ample space available for the court staff and visitors to use. “We want to make sure this is organized in a logical format for people coming to our offices,” she said.

Court staff have already begun paring down what they’ll take with them to their new space. “It’s really been an opportunity for us to move to a more paperless” office environment, Rodeheffer said. “We’ve reduced the number of filing cabinets we’re taking over, so that’s good progress.” Workers have been purging paper, shredding outdated documents, scanning those they can convert into digital formats, and trying to keep as little paper as possible, she said.

Willis said the coming move resulted from an evaluation of current space and future needs to make sure the court staff had sufficient room and that offices aligned with the departmental restructuring that came about with the establishment of the OJA last year.

“We had a good experience at 30 South,” Willis said. “I think everyone’s prepared for that big move.”•


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. The voices of the prophets are more on blogs than subway walls these days, Dawn. Here is the voice of one calling out in the wilderness ... against a corrupted judiciary ... that remains corrupt a decade and a half later ... due to, so sadly, the acquiescence of good judges unwilling to shake the forest ... for fear that is not faith ..

  2. So I purchased a vehicle cash from the lot on West Washington in Feb 2017. Since then I found it the vehicle had been declared a total loss and had sat in a salvage yard due to fire. My title does not show any of that. I also have had to put thousands of dollars into repairs because it was not a solid vehicle like they stated. I need to find out how to contact the lawyers on this lawsuit.

  3. It really doesn't matter what the law IS, if law enforcement refuses to take reports (or take them seriously), if courts refuse to allow unrepresented parties to speak (especially in Small Claims, which is supposedly "informal"). It doesn't matter what the law IS, if constituents are unable to make effective contact or receive any meaningful response from their representatives. Two of our pets were unnecessarily killed; court records reflect that I "abandoned" them. Not so; when I was denied one of them (and my possessions, which by court order I was supposed to be able to remove), I went directly to the court. And earlier, when I tried to have the DV PO extended (it expired while the subject was on probation for violating it), the court denied any extension. The result? Same problems, less than eight hours after expiration. Ironic that the county sheriff was charged (and later pleaded to) with intimidation, but none of his officers seemed interested or capable of taking such a report from a private citizen. When I learned from one officer what I needed to do, I forwarded audio and transcript of one occurrence and my call to law enforcement (before the statute of limitations expired) to the prosecutor's office. I didn't even receive an acknowledgement. Earlier, I'd gone in to the prosecutor's office and been told that the officer's (written) report didn't match what I said occurred. Since I had the audio, I can only say that I have very little faith in Indiana government or law enforcement.

  4. One can only wonder whether Mr. Kimmel was paid for his work by Mr. Burgh ... or whether that bill fell to the citizens of Indiana, many of whom cannot afford attorneys for important matters. It really doesn't take a judge(s) to know that "pavement" can be considered a deadly weapon. It only takes a brain and some education or thought. I'm glad to see the conviction was upheld although sorry to see that the asphalt could even be considered "an issue".

  5. In response to bryanjbrown: thank you for your comment. I am familiar with Paul Ogden (and applaud his assistance to Shirley Justice) and have read of Gary Welsh's (strange) death (and have visited his blog on many occasions). I am not familiar with you (yet). I lived in Kosciusko county, where the sheriff was just removed after pleading in what seems a very "sweetheart" deal. Unfortunately, something NEEDS to change since the attorneys won't (en masse) stand up for ethics (rather making a show to please the "rules" and apparently the judges). I read that many attorneys are underemployed. Seems wisdom would be to cull the herd and get rid of the rotting apples in practice and on the bench, for everyone's sake as well as justice. I'd like to file an attorney complaint, but I have little faith in anything (other than the most flagrant and obvious) resulting in action. My own belief is that if this was medicine, there'd be maimed and injured all over and the carnage caused by "the profession" would be difficult to hide. One can dream ... meanwhile, back to figuring out to file a pro se "motion to dismiss" as well as another court required paper that Indiana is so fond of providing NO resources for (unlike many other states, who don't automatically assume that citizens involved in the court process are scumbags) so that maybe I can get the family law attorney - whose work left me with no settlement, no possessions and resulted in the death of two pets (etc ad nauseum) - to stop abusing the proceedings supplemental and small claims rules and using it as a vehicle for harassment and apparently, amusement.