February 23, 2012
Michael HoskinsThe Indiana Judicial Nominating Commission has selected Indiana Court of Appeals Judge Cale J. Bradford, Indianapolis attorney
Mark S. Massa, and Jane A. Seigel of the Indiana Judicial Center as finalists for an upcoming Indiana Supreme Court vacancy.
More
February 22, 2012
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Supreme Court ruled on two cases Wednesday that stemmed from Batson challenges, and in doing so, articulated
the standard of review of such challenges when a defendant raises a Batson challenge at the trial level, but then
brings up a different argument on appeal.
More
February 22, 2012
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Supreme Court was divided 3-2 over whether to reduce the sentence of a man who received the maximum 20 years for
having cocaine within 1,000 feet of a school when police stopped his vehicle.
More
February 20, 2012
IL StaffThe newly created task force formed by the Indiana Supreme Court to look into the practices and procedures used in Marion
County Small Claims courts will hold its first of three hearings Wednesday.
More
February 17, 2012
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Supreme Court ruled Thursday that under Indiana Code 35-46-1-5(a), the enhancement of nonsupport of a dependent
child to a Class C felony because of an arrearage of $15,000 or more is triggered by the dollar amount owed, regardless of
how many children the parent has.
More
February 17, 2012
IL StaffThe seven lawyers in the running to be the next Indiana justice will be interviewed by the Judicial Nominating Commission
Feb. 23.
More
February 16, 2012
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Supreme Court has adjusted the time frame for which state non-merit employees who sued for back pay may be able
to recover funds. Instead of the period going back some 20 years, the justices decided the non-merit employee’s time
period should be the same as merit employees.
More
February 16, 2012
IL StaffThe Indiana Supreme Court decided Tuesday it will not disturb the ruling by the Indiana Court of Appeals that Floyd County
Prosecutor Keith Henderson can’t be involved in the retrial of David Camm. Camm is set to be tried for a third time
for the murders of his wife and two children.
More
February 15, 2012
The Indiana Supreme Court upheld the denial of a man’s petition for post-conviction relief claiming ineffective assistance
of counsel. In doing so, the justices addressed the use and language of a jury instruction and rewrote it to make it clearer.
More
February 15, 2012
Jennifer NelsonThe percentage of women in the semi-finalist group to be the next state justice decreased as compared to the state's population.
More
February 15, 2012
IL StaffRead For Publication opinions from Indiana's appellate courts and the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals.
More
February 14, 2012
Michael HoskinsTwo Indiana Supreme Court justices disagreed with their colleagues about not taking a case on the state’s wage payment
statute, issuing dissent that described how they believe the justices should clear up perceived uncertainty about whether
the law can be applied to certain claims before the Indiana Department of Labor.
More
February 14, 2012
Michael HoskinsA new task force will review the practices and procedures of the nine small claims courts within the state’s largest
county, following critical reports last year suggesting litigants may not receive the same access to justice in each court
or as parties have in other Indiana jurisdictions.
More
February 13, 2012
Michael HoskinsThe Indiana Supreme Court accepted two civil cases last week on transfer, in addition to the two-high profile appeals involving
legislative fines against lawmakers and Secretary of State Charlie White.
More
February 13, 2012
IL StaffAny gift contributed by a lawyer to the Indiana Bar Foundation’s Richard M. Givan Loan Repayment Assistance Program
this year could potentially quadruple in value, thanks to fund-matching initiatives.
More
February 9, 2012
Jennifer NelsonFour men and three women have been named semi-finalists to become the next Indiana Supreme Court justice.
More
February 8, 2012
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Supreme Court has taken the appeal of a Marion County judge’s decision that ordered Democratic members of
the Indiana House be refunded the money withheld from their paychecks due to a walkout in 2011.
More
February 8, 2012
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Supreme Court decided Tuesday to hear the appeals of a Marion County judge’s decision that found Indiana
Secretary of State Charlie White ineligible to hold office.
More
February 7, 2012
IL StaffThe interviews of the 15 applicants to be the next Indiana Supreme Court justice begin Wednesday afternoon in the Indiana
Statehouse.
More
February 7, 2012
Jennifer NelsonThe Democratic members of the Indiana House who faced fines for failing to attend sessions in protest of right-to-work legislation
will be reimbursed any amount withheld in 2011, according to a ruling from Marion Superior Judge David Dreyer. The judge also
ordered that any fines imposed this session may not be collected.
More
February 6, 2012
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Supreme Court granted transfer to two cases, including one involving the validity of a search warrant.
More
February 3, 2012
IL StaffThe Indiana Supreme Court Division of State Court Administration is taking advantage of the influx of visitors to central
Indiana this week to determine if the agency can function from a remote location in case of a disaster.
More
February 3, 2012
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Supreme Court has affirmed the suspension of a man’s driver’s license following his conviction of
possessing marijuana. While the driver’s license suspension statute generally applies only when the defendant uses the
vehicle in the commission of the offense, it’s not required that the defendant must either own or be driving the vehicle
when he commits the offense.
More
February 2, 2012
Jennifer NelsonA Kansas attorney who was denied admission to join the Indiana bar can’t bring his suit against various state actors
in federal court because of the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Thursday.
More
February 1, 2012
Michael HoskinsIndiana Supreme Court decisions on fee structures lack bright-line rules and have caused questions about practicality.
More
Judge Roger B. Cosbey is unethical and bias toward African American who seeks justice in Title VII claims. He disrespected and used his authority to attempt to intimidate me into taking an unfair settlement and when I refused he proceeded to get my case dismissed and to deny me my Constitutional and Civil Rights. He disobeying several rules of law; specifically, by ruling on summary judgment motions against the Fed. R. Civ. P., without authority of Judge William C. Lee, without consent of the attorneys, and with conspiracy to commit “fraud on the court,” as he conspired with my former attorney. He proved to me that he is bias, unethical, unfair and unfit to be reappointed. In my opinion, he should be disbarred in 2013, for committing fraud on the court, which would make him ineligible for reinstatement in 2014. See docket 3:07 cv 629 where he rules on dispositive motions, knowing magistrates are not vested with that power (especially without consent), grants the defendant an unconscionable number of extensions, accepts my former attorney request for extension for dispositive motion knowing he was working with the opposition, and unbelievably grants the defendant another extension after he requested an extension after he missed the deadline. I know another attorney filed charges against him for bias in race discrimination case(s). I know what he did in my case before he voluntarily recused himself, I just do not know how many other innocent people have been stripped of their rights because of him. I say shame on him and no more of the same.
they are pushing these cases against lawyers too far. thought-crime.
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.