March 4, 2011
Michael HoskinsThe Indiana Supreme Court’s Disciplinary Commission wants to set a new standard of “actual prejudice” for
attorney misconduct. In making that argument, the validity of two high-profile murder convictions that Carl Brizzi secured
during his time as prosecutor in the state’s largest county are being questioned.
More
March 2, 2011
Jennifer NelsonA northwestern Indiana county can’t withdraw from a regional development authority created by lawmakers to facilitate
economic development, the Indiana Court of Appeals held Wednesday.
More
March 2, 2011
Jennifer NelsonA trial court was correct in dismissing the petition for judicial review from a liquor wholesaler who challenged the issuance
of a wine and liquor permit to a competitor because the wholesaler lacked standing, ruled the Indiana Court of Appeals.
More
March 2, 2011
Michael HoskinsWhen deciding that a judge must be suspended and determining when that time off the bench should be, decision-makers must
maintain a delicate balance.
More
March 2, 2011
Rebecca BerfangerWhen it comes to human trafficking, most people who are unfamiliar with the crime visualize one person holding another hostage
and giving them limited contact with the rest of the world. Some envision a basement in a dungeon-like setting with chains
or other restraining devices, say advocates for victims of human trafficking.
More
March 2, 2011
Michael HoskinsDefense attorneys for former Indiana State Police trooper David Camm have asked the state’s intermediate appellate court
to accept an interlocutory appeal and decide whether a special judge should have appointed a new prosecutor to preside over
the man’s third trial.
More
February 28, 2011
IL StaffGov. Mitch Daniels made three judicial appointments, filling vacancies in Howard, Jay, and Wells county courts.
More
February 25, 2011
Jennifer NelsonIt’s been a controversial week at the Indiana General Assembly with the walkout by many Democrats in the House of Representatives
killing several bills in their current forms as legislative deadlines hit.
More
February 24, 2011
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Court of Appeals interpreted the elements of unlawful use of body armor for the first time in a defendant’s
appeal of his convictions following his attempt to flee from police.
More
February 22, 2011
IL StaffThe Indiana Supreme Court has appointed Indianapolis attorney Jane H. Conley as Judge Pro Tempore in Marion Superior Court,
according to a Feb. 16 order posted on the court’s website this week.
More
February 18, 2011
Jennifer NelsonFor the first time, the Indiana Court of Appeals addressed a contract that included a provision stating the signee is responsible
for 40 percent in attorney fees if a hospital had to initiate collection efforts to recover amounts owed.
More
February 18, 2011
Jennifer NelsonAn Indiana Court of Appeals judge expressed concern that a woman’s criminal case may be affected by her admittance of
violating several city ordinances after her dogs attacked two people.
More
February 17, 2011
Rebecca BerfangerThe Indiana Supreme Court heard oral arguments today involving the subpoena of records from a domestic violence agency by
a defendant who had been charged with two counts of Class A felony child molesting.
More
February 17, 2011
Jennifer NelsonThe bill that would end a mandatory retirement age for certain judges and the bill that would unify Clark County courts are
ready for third reading in their respective houses.
More
February 16, 2011
Cory SchoutenThe Indiana Court of Appeals has agreed to hear an appeal from the widow of the late Melvin Simon, putting on hold a legal
dispute over the mall magnate's more than $2 billion estate.
More
February 15, 2011
Michael HoskinsA 30-day unpaid suspension begins next week for Marion Superior Traffic Judge William Young, though the chief justice expects
the Indiana Supreme Court would have issued a lengthier sanction if a settlement had not been reached in the misconduct case.
More
February 14, 2011
Michael HoskinsA 30-day suspension without pay begins next week for Marion Superior Traffic Judge William Young.
More
February 11, 2011
IL StaffThe Senate bill aimed at increasing the automated record-keeping fee to pay for a statewide case management system made it
out of committee, but not before legislators decreased the fee beginning this year.
More
February 10, 2011
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Supreme Court has ruled on a 30-year fight between the owners of a proposed landfill and neighbors, ruling that
a new law doesn’t apply to the facility or require it to get a new permit.
More
February 10, 2011
Jennifer NelsonThe first person convicted of human trafficking in Marion County has received 10 years on the charge.
More
February 8, 2011
IL StaffThe Legal Aid Outback lunch and auction will be held Feb. 23 at Outback Steakhouse in Lafayette. Proceeds from the event benefit
Legal Aid Corporation of Tippecanoe County, a nonprofit that provides low-cost legal assistance to low-income county residents
on family law matters.
More
February 7, 2011
Jennifer NelsonA bill that would increase the automated record-keeping fee to pay for implementation of a statewide case-management system
and a bill that proposes to create a unified Circuit Court in Clark County are just two of the bills before committees this
week in the Indiana General Assembly.
More
February 7, 2011
IL StaffThe Indiana Supreme Court will hold oral arguments in a case alleging negligence against the Putnam County sheriff Tuesday
at Indiana University School of Law - Indianapolis.
More
February 7, 2011
Jennifer NelsonAlthough one Indiana Court of Appeals judge concurred that a biological father’s petition granting visitation with his
daughter should be reversed, he urged legislators and the Indiana Supreme Court to reconsider the issues raised in this case
to “avoid equally unjust results in future cases.”
More
February 3, 2011
Jennifer NelsonSeveral bills of impact on the courts saw action this week before the Indiana General Assembly shut down for two days after
a winter storm hit the state.
More
Judge Roger B. Cosbey is unethical and bias toward African American who seeks justice in Title VII claims. He disrespected and used his authority to attempt to intimidate me into taking an unfair settlement and when I refused he proceeded to get my case dismissed and to deny me my Constitutional and Civil Rights. He disobeying several rules of law; specifically, by ruling on summary judgment motions against the Fed. R. Civ. P., without authority of Judge William C. Lee, without consent of the attorneys, and with conspiracy to commit “fraud on the court,” as he conspired with my former attorney. He proved to me that he is bias, unethical, unfair and unfit to be reappointed. In my opinion, he should be disbarred in 2013, for committing fraud on the court, which would make him ineligible for reinstatement in 2014. See docket 3:07 cv 629 where he rules on dispositive motions, knowing magistrates are not vested with that power (especially without consent), grants the defendant an unconscionable number of extensions, accepts my former attorney request for extension for dispositive motion knowing he was working with the opposition, and unbelievably grants the defendant another extension after he requested an extension after he missed the deadline. I know another attorney filed charges against him for bias in race discrimination case(s). I know what he did in my case before he voluntarily recused himself, I just do not know how many other innocent people have been stripped of their rights because of him. I say shame on him and no more of the same.
they are pushing these cases against lawyers too far. thought-crime.
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.