ILNews

Indiana will likely go to court over online sales tax

 Associated Press
July 5, 2017
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana will likely end up in court over an online sales tax law.

Indiana lawmakers passed a law this spring claiming the state has a right to collect sales taxes from companies using only online transactions, The Indianapolis Star reported.

But a 25-year-old U.S. Supreme Court case prohibits states from collecting sales tax from businesses unless they've got a physical presence in the state.

This means states are losing out on sales taxes, one of its largest sources of revenue. More than 40 percent of Indiana's $18 billion revenue in 2016 came from sales tax.

Sen. Brandt Hershman, R-Buck Creek, who sponsored the Indiana bill, said he anticipates further litigation.

"We welcome the litigation," Hershman said.

Appropriations committee chair Luke Kenley, R-Noblesville, said he's worried stores that operate within Indiana and pay the 7 percent state sales tax are at a disadvantage.

"It's becoming a bigger problem and a bigger issue of fairness," Kenley said. "It's kind of a big issue to our brick-and-mortar stores because they're at a disadvantage here, and they do something for the state by operating in the state and employing people in the state."

The new Indiana law requires online retailers that make 200 separate transactions or have sales totaling more than $100,000 annually in the state to collect and remit the sales tax.

South Dakota passed a similar law in 2016. Online companies Wayfair Inc., Overstock.com Inc. and Newegg Inc. are suing the state. The case is being debated in South Dakota's top court and could make its way to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Opponents of online sales tax, such as e-commerce businesses trade association NetChoice, argue it would be "bureaucratic gymnastics" for companies to have to adhere to differing tax codes in every city and state.

Indiana has made agreements with nearly 2,000 companies, including Amazon, to collect some online sales tax.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Or does the study merely wish they fade away? “It just hasn’t risen substantially in decades,” Joan Williams, director of the Center for WorkLife Law at the University of California Hastings College of the Law told Law360. “What we should be looking for is progress, and that’s not what we’re seeing.” PROGRESS = less white males in leadership. Thus the heading and honest questions here ....

  2. One need not wonder why we are importing sex slaves into North America. Perhaps these hapless victims of human trafficking were being imported for a book of play with the Royal Order of Jesters? https://medium.com/@HeapingHelping/who-are-the-royal-order-of-jesters-55ffe6f6acea Indianapolis hosts these major pervs in a big way .... https://www.facebook.com/pages/The-Royal-Order-of-Jesters-National-Office/163360597025389 I wonder what affect they exert on Hoosier politics? And its judiciary? A very interesting program on their history and preferences here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VtgBdUtw26c

  3. Joseph Buser, Montgomery County Chief Prosecutor, has been involved in both representing the State of Indiana as Prosecutor while filing as Representing Attorney on behalf of himself and the State of Indiana in Civil Proceedings for seized cash and merchandise using a Verified Complaint For Forfeiture of Motor Vehicle, Us Currency And Reimbursement Of Costs, as is evident in Montgomery County Circuit Court Case Number 54C01-1401-MI-000018, CCS below, seen before Judge Harry Siamas, and filed on 01/13/2014. Sheriff Mark Castille is also named. All three defendants named by summons have prior convictions under Mr. Buser, which as the Indiana Supreme Court, in the opinion of The Matter of Mark R. McKinney, No. 18S00-0905-DI-220, stated that McKinney created a conflict of interest by simultaneously prosecuting drug offender cases while pocketing assets seized from defendants in those cases. All moneys that come from forfeitures MUST go to the COMMON SCHOOL FUND.

  4. I was incarcerated at that time for driving while suspended I have no felonies...i was placed on P block I remember several girls and myself asking about voting that day..and wasn't given a answer or means of voting..we were told after the election who won that was it.

  5. The number one way to reduce suffering would be to ban the breeding of fighting dogs. Fighting dogs maim and kill victim dogs Fighting dogs are the most essential piece of dog fighting Dog fighting will continue as long as fighting dogs are struggling to reach each other and maul another fih.longaphernalia

ADVERTISEMENT