Indiana women trial lawyers preparing for Congressional push

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
chips-sidebar-051717-15col.jpg Indiana attorneys (from left) Betsy Greene, Mary Beth Ramey, Andrea Hailey and Kathy Farinas meet with federal legislators in 2015. (Photo courtsey of Betsy Greene)

A contingent of Indiana female trial lawyers will head to Washington, D.C., this month to participate in the 20th anniversary of the American Association for Justice Women Trial Lawyers Caucus lobby day.

They will spend May 25 on Capitol Hill, talking to Indiana representatives and senators about issues and legislation that impact plaintiffs and their access to the courthouse. More than 100 women trial lawyers from around the country will be part of the effort, lobbying the Congressional delegations from their own states and raising the profile of female attorneys.

“It’s really opened my eyes to how our government works, and it’s given me a little bit of hope that in these bleak times, our voices can be heard,” said Kathy Farinas, partner at George & Farinas LLP in Indianapolis.

Farinas has participated in lobby days twice before. She will join about five other Indiana attorneys, including Betsy Greene, who has made the trip to Congress 16 times, and Lynn Toops, who will be attending for the first time.

The activity and influence of the women’s caucus are in stark contrast to the group that was present when Greene, partner at Greene & Schultz in Bloomington, joined the Indiana Trial Lawyers Association in 1989. Then it was the women’s auxiliary, primarily for the spouses of the attorney members.

She was just beginning to build her career as a trial lawyer and wanted to be seen as one of the guys, so she avoided any group with the word “female” in its title. Looking back, she said that approach was a little misguided.

Since she has become involved with the women’s caucus, Greene has seen the group grow and gain clout in the larger organization. The caucus has raised money, undertaken service projects and groomed women for leadership positions in the ITLA.

Also, it has provided a place where women trial lawyers can network and support each other as many of them share the daily juggling of work and family responsibilities. Toops, a partner at Cohen & Malad LLP in Indianapolis, joined the caucus to connect with women attorneys she credits with inspiring her to participate in lobby day.

The women’s caucus will convene May 24 to prep for the lobbying effort. They will review the agenda set by the AAJ and their talking points on each item as well as engage in some mock lobbying sessions. Once on Capitol Hill, the women will have a full schedule, moving from building to building to meet either with the legislators or their staff members.

Some of the meetings can be perfunctory when the congressional member supports tort reform, but Greene believes just by talking, the women attorneys can break the stereotype many elected officials may have of trial lawyers. The perception that plaintiff attorneys file frivolous lawsuits, hinder businesses and are only trying to make money can change when the women arrive to discuss the issues.

“I feel like it’s worth doing,” Greene said of lobby day. “I think we’re having an impact.”•


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. One can only wonder whether Mr. Kimmel was paid for his work by Mr. Burgh ... or whether that bill fell to the citizens of Indiana, many of whom cannot afford attorneys for important matters. It really doesn't take a judge(s) to know that "pavement" can be considered a deadly weapon. It only takes a brain and some education or thought. I'm glad to see the conviction was upheld although sorry to see that the asphalt could even be considered "an issue".

  2. In response to bryanjbrown: thank you for your comment. I am familiar with Paul Ogden (and applaud his assistance to Shirley Justice) and have read of Gary Welsh's (strange) death (and have visited his blog on many occasions). I am not familiar with you (yet). I lived in Kosciusko county, where the sheriff was just removed after pleading in what seems a very "sweetheart" deal. Unfortunately, something NEEDS to change since the attorneys won't (en masse) stand up for ethics (rather making a show to please the "rules" and apparently the judges). I read that many attorneys are underemployed. Seems wisdom would be to cull the herd and get rid of the rotting apples in practice and on the bench, for everyone's sake as well as justice. I'd like to file an attorney complaint, but I have little faith in anything (other than the most flagrant and obvious) resulting in action. My own belief is that if this was medicine, there'd be maimed and injured all over and the carnage caused by "the profession" would be difficult to hide. One can dream ... meanwhile, back to figuring out to file a pro se "motion to dismiss" as well as another court required paper that Indiana is so fond of providing NO resources for (unlike many other states, who don't automatically assume that citizens involved in the court process are scumbags) so that maybe I can get the family law attorney - whose work left me with no settlement, no possessions and resulted in the death of two pets (etc ad nauseum) - to stop abusing the proceedings supplemental and small claims rules and using it as a vehicle for harassment and apparently, amusement.

  3. Been on social security sense sept 2011 2massive strokes open heart surgery and serious ovarian cancer and a blood clot in my lung all in 14 months. Got a letter in may saying that i didn't qualify and it was in form like i just applied ,called social security she said it don't make sense and you are still geting a check in june and i did ,now i get a check from my part D asking for payment for july because there will be no money for my membership, call my prescription coverage part D and confirmed no check will be there.went to social security they didn't want to answer whats going on just said i should of never been on it .no one knows where this letter came from was California im in virginia and been here sense my strokes and vcu filed for my disability i was in the hospital when they did it .It's like it was a error . My ,mothers social security was being handled in that office in California my sister was dealing with it and it had my social security number because she died last year and this letter came out of the same office and it came at the same time i got the letter for my mother benefits for death and they had the same date of being typed just one was on the mail Saturday and one on Monday. . I think it's a mistake and it should been fixed instead there just getting rid of me .i never got a formal letter saying when i was being tsken off.

  4. Employers should not have racially discriminating mind set. It has huge impact on the society what the big players do or don't do in the industry. Background check is conducted just to verify whether information provided by the prospective employee is correct or not. It doesn't have any direct combination with the rejection of the employees. If there is rejection, there should be something effective and full-proof things on the table that may keep the company or the people associated with it in jeopardy.

  5. Unlike the federal judge who refused to protect me, the Virginia State Bar gave me a hearing. After the hearing, the Virginia State Bar refused to discipline me. VSB said that attacking me with the court ADA coordinator had, " all the grace and charm of a drive-by shooting." One does wonder why the VSB was able to have a hearing and come to that conclusion, but the federal judge in Indiana slammed the door of the courthouse in my face.