ILNews

IBA: Indianapolis Bar Foundation Has Record Year

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Ever heard the expression, “give a little, give a lot?” Those supporting the Indianapolis Bar Foundation in 2009 did just that. Whether through a $35 contribution through the Indianapolis Bar Association’s dues renewal or a larger direct contribution; members of the legal community provided nearly $150,000 to fund a variety of community service programs and initiatives. These efforts will provide access for the public to legal services or help lawyers become better stewards of the law. And without donor support – legal community support – these programs could not happen.

“For lawyers who are interested in community outreach, the IBF is the mechanism by which most of these programs are funded,” said John R. Maley, Indianapolis Bar Foundation President. “Ask A Lawyer, Legal Line, Low Asset Wills Program, the Diversity Job Fair – all of these are supported by the Foundation. So donor money and time have a great deal of impact.”

The mission of the IBF – to advance the administration of – rang true with donors in 2009. A record number of donors gave to the IBF last year, 2,015 total. Even so, the work continues and the need for the services supported by these contributors is as great as ever.

There are some fun ways to contribute to the IBF. Coming up on July 8, 2010, is the Lawyer Links Classic, a fantastic golf outing that has gotten bigger and better each year. Put a foursome together for a fun afternoon at Broadmoor Country Club. There are also event sponsorships and hole sponsorships available – a great way to get some exposure and support the IBF.

“There are many golf outings, but there is a lot of collegiality at the Lawyer Links Classic and the money raised supports organizations that lawyers truly care about,” Maley said.

In the fall, the IBF holds its most popular event, An Evening Under the Stars dinner and auction. Attended by more than 300 legal and business community leaders each year, the dinner will be held at the Ritz Charles in Carmel. “This is the IBF’s main fundraiser, but it has become more than that – it is a place to relax and have a great time,” said Kelley Johnson, Dinner/Auction Chair and attorney with Cohen & Malad. “It’s an evening of fun, great food, and time spent with great people bidding on some tremendous auction items.”

Evening Under the Stars will be on Friday, September 10, 2010. Gather your friends, colleagues and clients for a great evening to benefit the IBF. You may register for both the Lawyer Links Classic and the annual dinner at www.indybar.org.

In 2009, these three events raised more than $74,200, on the way to helping the Foundation raise nearly $280,000. The goal for 2010 is $250,000, which Maley and the IBF board hope will be bolstered by getting even more law firms to support the annual Law Firm Campaign. “We had tremendous support from lawyers and law firms last year; the number of firms that achieved 100% of its employees giving to the IBF had significant growth,” he said. “We hope to expand that this year.”

In addition to funding new and existing programs, the IBF supports efforts that cultivate leadership in the community and assist law students, among them the IBA Bar Leader Series and the IBF scholarships for law students. Deserving members of the legal profession also are selected as Distinguished Fellows of the IBF, who show their support of the legal community in many ways. The IBF will also be launching a Senior Fellows initiative to recognize donors who have demonstrated leadership and long-term support of the IBF’s mission.

“The Foundation has grown significantly since I began work with the Indianapolis Bar in 1991,” said Julie Armstrong, Indianapolis Bar Foundation and Association Executive Director. “Back in the day the IBF was a somewhat sleepy sister to the Association. Through the vision of many past leaders the IBF’s impact and success has grown.”

Why should you give to the Indianapolis Bar Foundation in 2010? Because the IBF directly supports programs and causes that you care about as a legal professional. Plus, the IBF throws a pretty good party. Those interested in getting involved are encouraged to email Julie Armstrong at jarmstrong@indybar.org.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Poor Judge Brown probably thought that by slavishly serving the godz of the age her violations of 18th century concepts like due process and the rule of law would be overlooked. Mayhaps she was merely a Judge ahead of her time?

  2. in a lawyer discipline case Judge Brown, now removed, was presiding over a hearing about a lawyer accused of the supposedly heinous ethical violation of saying the words "Illegal immigrant." (IN re Barker) http://www.in.gov/judiciary/files/order-discipline-2013-55S00-1008-DI-429.pdf .... I wonder if when we compare the egregious violations of due process by Judge Brown, to her chiding of another lawyer for politically incorrectness, if there are any conclusions to be drawn about what kind of person, what kind of judge, what kind of apparatchik, is busy implementing the agenda of political correctness and making off-limits legit advocacy about an adverse party in a suit whose illegal alien status is relevant? I am just asking the question, the reader can make own conclsuion. Oh wait-- did I use the wrong adjective-- let me rephrase that, um undocumented alien?

  3. of course the bigger questions of whether or not the people want to pay for ANY bussing is off limits, due to the Supreme Court protecting the people from DEMOCRACY. Several decades hence from desegregation and bussing plans and we STILL need to be taking all this taxpayer money to combat mostly-imagined "discrimination" in the most obviously failed social program of the postwar period.

  4. You can put your photos anywhere you like... When someone steals it they know it doesn't belong to them. And, a man getting a divorce is automatically not a nice guy...? That's ridiculous. Since when is need of money a conflict of interest? That would mean that no one should have a job unless they are already financially solvent without a job... A photographer is also under no obligation to use a watermark (again, people know when a photo doesn't belong to them) or provide contact information. Hey, he didn't make it easy for me to pay him so I'll just take it! Well heck, might as well walk out of the grocery store with a cart full of food because the lines are too long and you don't find that convenient. "Only in Indiana." Oh, now you're passing judgement on an entire state... What state do you live in? I need to characterize everyone in your state as ignorant and opinionated. And the final bit of ignorance; assuming a photo anyone would want is lucky and then how much does your camera have to cost to make it a good photo, in your obviously relevant opinion?

  5. Seventh Circuit Court Judge Diane Wood has stated in “The Rule of Law in Times of Stress” (2003), “that neither laws nor the procedures used to create or implement them should be secret; and . . . the laws must not be arbitrary.” According to the American Bar Association, Wood’s quote drives home this point: The rule of law also requires that people can expect predictable results from the legal system; this is what Judge Wood implies when she says that “the laws must not be arbitrary.” Predictable results mean that people who act in the same way can expect the law to treat them in the same way. If similar actions do not produce similar legal outcomes, people cannot use the law to guide their actions, and a “rule of law” does not exist.

ADVERTISEMENT