ILNews

Indianapolis Bar Foundation Honors Distinguished Fellows

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

iba-fellows-sidebarEach year the Indianapolis Bar Foundation honors individuals for their dedication to the law by bestowing on them the designation of Distinguished Fellow. This small but select group is chosen by the Directors of the Indianapolis Bar Foundation to become Distinguished Fellows as a result of their significant contributions to the legal profession and to our community.

Nominated by a committee of Bar Foundation board members and active contributors, the 2011 Class of Distinguished Fellows includes the following members of the Indianapolis legal community:

David A. Adams, Bingham McHale LLP

Nicholas F. Baker, The Hastings Law Firm

Reynold T. Berry, Rubin & Levin PC

Tracy N. Betz, Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP

Carl W. Butler, Frost Brown Todd LLC

Andrew L. Campbell, Baker & Daniels LLP

Marie D. Castetter, Foley & Abbott

Sonia S. Chen, Eli Lilly and Company

Hamish S. Cohen, Barnes & Thornburg LLP

Aaron J. Dixon, Ice Miller LLP

Peter H. Donahoe, Donahoe Irvin PC

Andrew R. Duncan, Ruckelshaus Kautzman Blackwell Bemis & Hasbrook

Kristin P. Dutton, Bingham McHale LLP

David A. Given, Baker & Daniels LLP

Kathleen I. Hart, Riley Bennett & Egloff LLP

Kena S. Hollingsworth, Hollingsworth & Zivitz, PC

David E. Kress, Benesch

Susan E. Krohne, Pedcor Investments, LLC

Aubrey G. Kuchar, Kightlinger & Gray LLP

Shannon D. Landreth, Bingham McHale LLP

Nicholas W. Levi, Kightlinger & Gray LLP

Marc G. Lopez, Attorney at Law

Robin M. Lybolt, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

Heather H. Macek, Barnes & Thornburg LLP

Anna Muehling Mallon, Cantrell Strenski & Mehringer LLP

Brent D. Mosby, Exact Target

Kenneth J. Munson, Bingham McHale LLP

Jennifer Richter, Hall Render Killian Heath & Lyman, PC

James E. Rossow Jr., Rubin & Levin PC

Charles P. Schmal, Woodard Emhardt Moriarty McNett & Henry LLP

Justine Overturf Singh, Fifth Third Private Bank

Natalie M. Snyder, Cross Woolsey & Glazier PC

Dana E. Stutzman, Hall Render Killian Heath & Lyman, PC•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Oh, the name calling was not name calling, it was merely social commentary making this point, which is on the minds of many, as an aside to the article's focus: https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100111082327AAmlmMa Or, if you prefer a local angle, I give you exhibit A in that analysis of viva la difference: http://fox59.com/2015/03/16/moed-appears-on-house-floor-says-hes-not-resigning/

  2. Too many attorneys take their position as a license to intimidate and threaten non attorneys in person and by mail. Did find it ironic that a reader moved to comment twice on this article could not complete a paragraph without resorting to insulting name calling (rethuglican) as a substitute for reasoned discussion. Some people will never get the point this action should have made.

  3. People have heard of Magna Carta, and not the Provisions of Oxford & Westminster. Not that anybody really cares. Today, it might be considered ethnic or racial bias to talk about the "Anglo Saxon common law." I don't even see the word English in the blurb above. Anyhow speaking of Edward I-- he was famously intolerant of diversity himself viz the Edict of Expulsion 1290. So all he did too like making parliament a permanent institution-- that all must be discredited. 100 years from now such commemorations will be in the dustbin of history.

  4. Oops, I meant discipline, not disciple. Interesting that those words share such a close relationship. We attorneys are to be disciples of the law, being disciplined to serve the law and its source, the constitutions. Do that, and the goals of Magna Carta are advanced. Do that not and Magna Carta is usurped. Do that not and you should be disciplined. Do that and you should be counted a good disciple. My experiences, once again, do not reveal a process that is adhering to the due process ideals of Magna Carta. Just the opposite, in fact. Braveheart's dying rebel (for a great cause) yell comes to mind.

  5. It is not a sign of the times that many Ind licensed attorneys (I am not) would fear writing what I wrote below, even if they had experiences to back it up. Let's take a minute to thank God for the brave Baron's who risked death by torture to tell the government that it was in the wrong. Today is a career ruination that whistleblowers risk. That is often brought on by denial of licenses or disciple for those who dare speak truth to power. Magna Carta says truth rules power, power too often claims that truth matters not, only Power. Fight such power for the good of our constitutional republics. If we lose them we have only bureaucratic tyranny to pass onto our children. Government attorneys, of all lawyers, should best realize this and work to see our patrimony preserved. I am now a government attorney (once again) in Kansas, and respecting the rule of law is my passion, first and foremost.

ADVERTISEMENT