ILNews

Indianapolis firm opens Delaware office

IL Staff
September 3, 2009
Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Barnes & Thornburg has opened an office in Delaware to help clients with finance, insolvency, restructuring, and business bankruptcy issues, the Indianapolis-based firm announced today.

The Wilmington, Del., office opened Aug. 15 and will be staffed by partner David M. Powlen, who is admitted to practice there. He will be assisted by partner Mark Owens, who is also admitted in Delaware. Before he joined Barnes, Owens was based in the Wilmington office of a multi-jurisdictional law firm serving business clients.

The firm opened the office in response to the increase in Chapter 11 cases filed in Delaware by businesses organized under that state's law, said Patrick Mears, chair of Barnes' Finance, Insolvency and Restructuring Department, in a statement. This office will be able to offer the firm's clients and potential clients a more efficient and economical means of representing them in Chapter 11 cases in Delaware courts, he said. In addition to Powlen, Owens, and Mears, other FIR Department attorneys are admitted to practice in the Southern District of New York, which is another leading jurisdiction for Chapter 11 reorganization cases.

This is the fourth market Barnes has expanded into this year. It opened new offices in Atlanta and Columbus, Ohio, in April and acquired The Parsinen Law Firm in Minneapolis in July.

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. As one of the many consumers affected by this breach, I found my bank data had been lifted and used to buy over $200 of various merchandise in New York. I did a pretty good job of tracing the purchases to stores around a college campus just from the info on my bank statement. Hm. Mr. Hill, I would like my $200 back! It doesn't belong to the state, in my opinion. Give it back to the consumers affected. I had to freeze my credit and take out data protection, order a new debit card and wait until it arrived. I deserve something for my trouble!

  2. Don't we have bigger issues to concern ourselves with?

  3. Anyone who takes the time to study disciplinary and bar admission cases in Indiana ... much of which is, as a matter of course and by intent, off the record, would have a very difficult time drawing lines that did not take into account things which are not supposed to matter, such as affiliations, associations, associates and the like. Justice Hoosier style is a far departure than what issues in most other parts of North America. (More like Central America, in fact.) See, e.g., http://www.theindianalawyer.com/indiana-attorney-illegally-practicing-in-florida-suspended-for-18-months/PARAMS/article/42200 When while the Indiana court system end the cruel practice of killing prophets of due process and those advocating for blind justice?

  4. Wouldn't this call for an investigation of Government corruption? Chief Justice Loretta Rush, wrote that the case warranted the high court’s review because the method the Indiana Court of Appeals used to reach its decision was “a significant departure from the law.” Specifically, David wrote that the appellate panel ruled after reweighing of the evidence, which is NOT permissible at the appellate level. **But yet, they look the other way while an innocent child was taken by a loving mother who did nothing wrong"

  5. Different rules for different folks....

ADVERTISEMENT