ILNews

Indiana's legal aid in trouble?

Rebecca Berfanger
October 29, 2008
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Economic Impact

With a legal aid agency closing in Fort Wayne, what's ahead for other legal aid providers in Indiana?

Some organizations - such as the privately funded Legal Aid Society of Evansville and the Indianapolis Legal Aid Society - and Indiana Legal Services Inc., which receives federal money annually from Legal Services Corporation - seem to be doing OK so far. But all are unsure what's to come as 2008 winds down and as United Way campaigns continue through the end of the year.

Budget issues led to the decision to close Legal Services of Maumee Valley in Fort Wayne, which was first reported in a story Oct. 13 by Jennifer Mehalik in Indiana Lawyer Daily. In that story, it was reported Legal Services of Maumee Valley, which had served the community since 1960, has been struggling to stay open for the past six to eight years, and the last two were the most difficult, according to Business Manager Steven Morgan.

Is Maumee Valley's closing a sign of things to come?
Jonathan Weinzapfel, Jeff Korb, Sue Ann Harting
Legal Aid Society of Evansville doesn't foresee any reason to close its doors, having enough in the reserves for at least a few years.

The organization has been celebrating its 50th anniversary this year, culminating in a courthouse reception Oct. 17 with about 200 guests. City and county government officials delivered a proclamation that day would be Legal Aid Services Day.

LASE receives funds from United Way, the city of Evansville, and Vanderburgh County. It also gets the first opportunity to serve clients in Evansville and Vanderburgh County, while most of ILS' clients are in the surrounding counties in southwestern Indiana: Daviess, Dubois, Gibson, Knox, Martin, Perry, Pike, Posey, Spencer, and Warrick.

"Legal Aid Society of Evansville and ILS get along well," said Sue Ann Hartig, the organization's executive director. "Not many others can say that. We understand there's more than enough work for both of us, and we're not competing for the same dollars."

In 2007, three attorneys in LASE's office represented more than 800 different cases.

"This organization has a budget of $410,000, but if the work had been done by a private firm it would have come to more than $1.6 million in services to the community," said vice president Cathy Nestrick.

As far as how the budget will go in 2009, Hartig and Nestrick mentioned that at least one employer in Evansville will not be participating in United Way's campaign - Bristol Meyers - which would match contributions and could account for about 10 percent of the funds United Way raises.

As far as funds from the county and city, LASE has been asked to have the same bottom line as last year.

Hartig said that intake "has stayed about the same" over the years.

Indiana Legal ServicesLASE employees are also involved in the community, working on the root causes of poverty. The attorneys also became certified with the IRS to help low-income people get their earned income tax credit.

"Something like $2 million didn't come back to community," she said. "All three attorneys … helped prepare taxes January through April … after work hours."

In Indianapolis, ILAS is doing well, even with other area legal aid providers such as ILS and Neighborhood Christian Legal Clinic, according to Executive Director John Floreancig.

"We mostly represent Marion County, but do work in some of the (surrounding) counties," he said.

ILS' Indianapolis office represents Boone, Decatur, Delaware, Fayette, Franklin, Hamilton, Hancock, Hendricks, Henry, Johnson, Madison, Marion, Randolph, Rush, Shelby, Union, and Wayne counties.

"There's a huge competition for funding, obviously. ILS gets federal funding, and NCLC is constantly in the same room with us for funding," he said.

ILAS budget will increase for next year, "only because of cost to keep the doors open," he said.

As far as what effect the economy will have on ILAS's fundraising efforts, "I haven't seen it yet," he said. "Our gauge is how United Way does. Their campaign started just a month ago. … But we have to go forward with a budget we think will work for us."

But without question, he said, the number of clients has increased.

"We had a line out the door this morning - our waiting room just isn't big enough," he said. "We don't just see debt issues, but family law issues. With money being tight, the two seem to go hand-in-hand. Other issues run the gamut."

In September alone, Floreancig said ILAS saw 200 more people than in September 2007. "It's a catch-22," he said. "When the economy is bad, you don't get more funding, but you do get more requests for help." Last year the organization helped 8,200 clients and this year's numbers will likely match or exceed that number.

Norman Metzger, executive director of ILS, said funding for the organization that represents all 92 counties has gone up.

"Like other organizations, we do have funding that comes and goes, that's the nature of the beast," said Metzger, who has been with the organization for 41 years."But over the past seven years, I haven't seen our funding go down; instead I saw it go up. … We're actually in our best shape as far as funding since 2001 right now."

He said the organization has gotten creative in terms of programs and types of grants ILS applies for, based on the needs of the population it serves.

For instance, an IRS grant helps ILS run a tax clinic in Bloomington, and ILS has received a few grants for programs that offer legal assistance for clients facing foreclosure.

As far as the perception of competition around the state, Metzger said, "I don't want to belabor the fact some organizations get along well with us and some don't. But (LASE) and the pro bono plan down there, led by Beverly Corn, is terrific. We all work together and it's a clear example of how one plus one equals four."

He added that the Indianapolis, Bloomington, and South Bend legal aid communities tend to work well amongst themselves.

As far as Maumee Valley closing, Metzger said it wasn't something ILS wanted to happen, even after a failed merger agreement between the two organizations in the late 1990s when Legal Services Corporation required states to have a centralized office to allocate federal funds.

After the merger of other legal aid providers, ILS opened a Fort Wayne office, and the two would refer cases to each other, especially when there were conflicts.

"I'm saddened by the fact they're going out of business," he said,"but that isn't to say between us and Volunteer Lawyers Program (of Northeast Indiana) that we aren't going to be able to move forward and handle the increase in demand."

Two other sources of legal aid have Fort Wayne connections - the Allen County Bar Association's Talk to a Lawyer Today program once a week, and the NCLC has an intake in Fort Wayne once a month.

Those interviewed for this story said while it's difficult to predict the future of funding for legal aid in Indiana, they are trying to be mindful of their budgets and hope attorneys will continue to volunteer their time and contribute to legal aid providers when they can.

"Maybe people will see the need, take the charge, and give more," Floreancig said.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. It appears the police and prosecutors are allowed to change the rules halfway through the game to suit themselves. I am surprised that the congress has not yet eliminated the right to a trial in cases involving any type of forensic evidence. That would suit their foolish law and order police state views. I say we eliminate the statute of limitations for crimes committed by members of congress and other government employees. Of course they would never do that. They are all corrupt cowards!!!

  2. Poor Judge Brown probably thought that by slavishly serving the godz of the age her violations of 18th century concepts like due process and the rule of law would be overlooked. Mayhaps she was merely a Judge ahead of her time?

  3. in a lawyer discipline case Judge Brown, now removed, was presiding over a hearing about a lawyer accused of the supposedly heinous ethical violation of saying the words "Illegal immigrant." (IN re Barker) http://www.in.gov/judiciary/files/order-discipline-2013-55S00-1008-DI-429.pdf .... I wonder if when we compare the egregious violations of due process by Judge Brown, to her chiding of another lawyer for politically incorrectness, if there are any conclusions to be drawn about what kind of person, what kind of judge, what kind of apparatchik, is busy implementing the agenda of political correctness and making off-limits legit advocacy about an adverse party in a suit whose illegal alien status is relevant? I am just asking the question, the reader can make own conclsuion. Oh wait-- did I use the wrong adjective-- let me rephrase that, um undocumented alien?

  4. of course the bigger questions of whether or not the people want to pay for ANY bussing is off limits, due to the Supreme Court protecting the people from DEMOCRACY. Several decades hence from desegregation and bussing plans and we STILL need to be taking all this taxpayer money to combat mostly-imagined "discrimination" in the most obviously failed social program of the postwar period.

  5. You can put your photos anywhere you like... When someone steals it they know it doesn't belong to them. And, a man getting a divorce is automatically not a nice guy...? That's ridiculous. Since when is need of money a conflict of interest? That would mean that no one should have a job unless they are already financially solvent without a job... A photographer is also under no obligation to use a watermark (again, people know when a photo doesn't belong to them) or provide contact information. Hey, he didn't make it easy for me to pay him so I'll just take it! Well heck, might as well walk out of the grocery store with a cart full of food because the lines are too long and you don't find that convenient. "Only in Indiana." Oh, now you're passing judgement on an entire state... What state do you live in? I need to characterize everyone in your state as ignorant and opinionated. And the final bit of ignorance; assuming a photo anyone would want is lucky and then how much does your camera have to cost to make it a good photo, in your obviously relevant opinion?

ADVERTISEMENT