ILNews

Indiana's legal aid in trouble?

Rebecca Berfanger
October 29, 2008
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
Economic Impact

With a legal aid agency closing in Fort Wayne, what's ahead for other legal aid providers in Indiana?

Some organizations - such as the privately funded Legal Aid Society of Evansville and the Indianapolis Legal Aid Society - and Indiana Legal Services Inc., which receives federal money annually from Legal Services Corporation - seem to be doing OK so far. But all are unsure what's to come as 2008 winds down and as United Way campaigns continue through the end of the year.

Budget issues led to the decision to close Legal Services of Maumee Valley in Fort Wayne, which was first reported in a story Oct. 13 by Jennifer Mehalik in Indiana Lawyer Daily. In that story, it was reported Legal Services of Maumee Valley, which had served the community since 1960, has been struggling to stay open for the past six to eight years, and the last two were the most difficult, according to Business Manager Steven Morgan.

Is Maumee Valley's closing a sign of things to come?
Jonathan Weinzapfel, Jeff Korb, Sue Ann Harting
Legal Aid Society of Evansville doesn't foresee any reason to close its doors, having enough in the reserves for at least a few years.

The organization has been celebrating its 50th anniversary this year, culminating in a courthouse reception Oct. 17 with about 200 guests. City and county government officials delivered a proclamation that day would be Legal Aid Services Day.

LASE receives funds from United Way, the city of Evansville, and Vanderburgh County. It also gets the first opportunity to serve clients in Evansville and Vanderburgh County, while most of ILS' clients are in the surrounding counties in southwestern Indiana: Daviess, Dubois, Gibson, Knox, Martin, Perry, Pike, Posey, Spencer, and Warrick.

"Legal Aid Society of Evansville and ILS get along well," said Sue Ann Hartig, the organization's executive director. "Not many others can say that. We understand there's more than enough work for both of us, and we're not competing for the same dollars."

In 2007, three attorneys in LASE's office represented more than 800 different cases.

"This organization has a budget of $410,000, but if the work had been done by a private firm it would have come to more than $1.6 million in services to the community," said vice president Cathy Nestrick.

As far as how the budget will go in 2009, Hartig and Nestrick mentioned that at least one employer in Evansville will not be participating in United Way's campaign - Bristol Meyers - which would match contributions and could account for about 10 percent of the funds United Way raises.

As far as funds from the county and city, LASE has been asked to have the same bottom line as last year.

Hartig said that intake "has stayed about the same" over the years.

Indiana Legal ServicesLASE employees are also involved in the community, working on the root causes of poverty. The attorneys also became certified with the IRS to help low-income people get their earned income tax credit.

"Something like $2 million didn't come back to community," she said. "All three attorneys … helped prepare taxes January through April … after work hours."

In Indianapolis, ILAS is doing well, even with other area legal aid providers such as ILS and Neighborhood Christian Legal Clinic, according to Executive Director John Floreancig.

"We mostly represent Marion County, but do work in some of the (surrounding) counties," he said.

ILS' Indianapolis office represents Boone, Decatur, Delaware, Fayette, Franklin, Hamilton, Hancock, Hendricks, Henry, Johnson, Madison, Marion, Randolph, Rush, Shelby, Union, and Wayne counties.

"There's a huge competition for funding, obviously. ILS gets federal funding, and NCLC is constantly in the same room with us for funding," he said.

ILAS budget will increase for next year, "only because of cost to keep the doors open," he said.

As far as what effect the economy will have on ILAS's fundraising efforts, "I haven't seen it yet," he said. "Our gauge is how United Way does. Their campaign started just a month ago. … But we have to go forward with a budget we think will work for us."

But without question, he said, the number of clients has increased.

"We had a line out the door this morning - our waiting room just isn't big enough," he said. "We don't just see debt issues, but family law issues. With money being tight, the two seem to go hand-in-hand. Other issues run the gamut."

In September alone, Floreancig said ILAS saw 200 more people than in September 2007. "It's a catch-22," he said. "When the economy is bad, you don't get more funding, but you do get more requests for help." Last year the organization helped 8,200 clients and this year's numbers will likely match or exceed that number.

Norman Metzger, executive director of ILS, said funding for the organization that represents all 92 counties has gone up.

"Like other organizations, we do have funding that comes and goes, that's the nature of the beast," said Metzger, who has been with the organization for 41 years."But over the past seven years, I haven't seen our funding go down; instead I saw it go up. … We're actually in our best shape as far as funding since 2001 right now."

He said the organization has gotten creative in terms of programs and types of grants ILS applies for, based on the needs of the population it serves.

For instance, an IRS grant helps ILS run a tax clinic in Bloomington, and ILS has received a few grants for programs that offer legal assistance for clients facing foreclosure.

As far as the perception of competition around the state, Metzger said, "I don't want to belabor the fact some organizations get along well with us and some don't. But (LASE) and the pro bono plan down there, led by Beverly Corn, is terrific. We all work together and it's a clear example of how one plus one equals four."

He added that the Indianapolis, Bloomington, and South Bend legal aid communities tend to work well amongst themselves.

As far as Maumee Valley closing, Metzger said it wasn't something ILS wanted to happen, even after a failed merger agreement between the two organizations in the late 1990s when Legal Services Corporation required states to have a centralized office to allocate federal funds.

After the merger of other legal aid providers, ILS opened a Fort Wayne office, and the two would refer cases to each other, especially when there were conflicts.

"I'm saddened by the fact they're going out of business," he said,"but that isn't to say between us and Volunteer Lawyers Program (of Northeast Indiana) that we aren't going to be able to move forward and handle the increase in demand."

Two other sources of legal aid have Fort Wayne connections - the Allen County Bar Association's Talk to a Lawyer Today program once a week, and the NCLC has an intake in Fort Wayne once a month.

Those interviewed for this story said while it's difficult to predict the future of funding for legal aid in Indiana, they are trying to be mindful of their budgets and hope attorneys will continue to volunteer their time and contribute to legal aid providers when they can.

"Maybe people will see the need, take the charge, and give more," Floreancig said.

 


ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. G. Michael Witte letter states he's suspended for three years. The case that got him suspended is identical to my estate case, including havin the Late Judge Deiter recuse himself because Newman had a conflict of interest with the judge. His Modus Operandi is nearly identical.

  2. SIGNED BY G. MICHAEL WITTE EXECUTIVE SECRETARY INDIANA SUPREME COURT DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION DATED MAY 17, 2012.

    Your 6th complaint against Lawrence T. Newman filed on 4/12/2012. On 1/31/12, the Indiana Supreme Court entered an order suspending Lawrence T. Newman’s law license for a period of three years. More important, even after three years, Lawrence Todd Newman will not get his license back unless and until he goes through a separate proceeding to prove that he is fit to practice law. This is not an easy process, and the burden is upon Lawrence T. Newman to prove by clear and convincing evidence that he is fit to return to practice.
    Because of the length of Lawrence T. Newman’s license suspension and the fact he may never succeed in getting his law license reinstated, we are not opening an investigation file at this time.
    Should Lawrence T. Newman seek reinstatement in the future, we will open your file and ask Lawrence T. Newman to address your grievance as part of his burden of proving fitness. We have attempted to notify Lawrence T. Newman that this will be required of him.
    It may disappoint you to hear that we will be doing nothing on your grievance at this time. However, the most our office can ever accomplish is to take away a lawyer’s license to practice law. We have already done that, albeit as a result of misconduct in cases other than your own. It makes better sense for our office to focus its limited resources on cases where the lawyers are still actively practicing law.

  3. Is there any justice in the Marion County Superior Court Civil Division? I am the unfortunate victim of a retaliatory lawsuit brought by Lawrence Todd Newman, the attorney from an estate case on which I worked as a unsupervised personal representative in 2006. The contract agreement for that case stated that the estate would be responsible for all attorney fees, but Newman refused to close the nearly insolvent estate when my duties were complete and his fees were paid. Instead, he tried to extort additional attorney fees from me by keeping the case open to address a wrongful death claim, despite the estate’s heir’s lack of interest in pursuing it and an expert doctor’s opinion that it would not be worth doing so. He also knowingly deceived me into believing that a “closing statement” was needed to close the estate, even though this requirement had actually been waived by the estate’s heir. The heir’s attorney filed a motion to have Newman removed from the case. After the court closed the probate case with prejudice (barred from further litigation) Newman illegally re-opened the case in another courtroom.
    As a result of complaints filed against him for these and similar actions, Newman has been suspended from practicing law for 18 months by the Indiana Disciplinary Commission. In retaliation, he has filed suit against me demanding additional attorney fees for the 2006 estate case, despite the fact that I made no agreement stating that I would pay any fees from my own assets on behalf of the estate. This lawsuit violates the rules of ethics, due process of law, and equal protection of law. Newman has been allowed to file ridiculous pleadings at an alarming rate and has been supported by a biased court system. Judge Carroll refuses to recuse himself from the case despite the fact that, by his own admission, he intends to grant Newman sanctions regardless of the evidence. When my former counsel discovered that the previous judge on the case, Judge Sosin, was a long-time close friend of Newman’s family, Judge Carroll commented for the record during a hearing that Judge Sosin in so many words “he finds the door “was weak for recusing himself from the case as a result of this obvious conflict of interest.
    This case is a public policy issue. Statutes put in place to protect unsupervised personal representatives in probate matters are being ignored. This case will affect thousands of individuals involved in probating and the personal representation of estates. Justice cannot possibly be served as long as a biased judge is allowed to defend a “vexatious litigant,” as Newman has been described by Judge Logan in Bradenton, Florida court. If there is any justice in the Marion County Superior Court Civil Division, this case against me will be dismissed with prejudice.

  4. Every affront to decency and every style adopted by criminals is not per se a constituttional violation. Only fools believe or espouse that.

  5. This was an unnecessary change in law, a needless fiddling with a tax that impacted very very few hoosiers, but one that erodes a tax base benefitting very many hoosiers. Just because some people wanted to chalk up a "tax cut" on their legislative brag-list, and didnt give a fig about replacing the revenue any other way. Really stupid. I am a republican my whole life and this just shames me like hell. I have to use a fake name over this because I know my fellow republicans are all brain washed over tax cutting too.

ADVERTISEMENT