ILNews

Indy attorney ID card fee to increase, but so should perks

Dave Stafford
September 27, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The fee lawyers pay for identification allowing them to avoid security checkpoint lines at the City-County Building in Indianapolis will increase, but so will the functionality of the cards, according to a proposal adopted Friday.

Attorneys will pay $35 for the ID effective Jan. 1, 2014, an increase from the current $25, according to the proposal adopted by the Marion Superior Court Executive Committee. The cards will continue to be issued on a two-year basis as they have been since they were instituted in 2002.

The courts’ chief technology officer Amitav Thamba said about 2,300 attorneys currently have ID cards, all of which expire Dec. 31. He told the committee that attorneys who have the cards should receive notices shortly, and attorneys in good standing will be able to renew with online payments. Attorneys who don’t have a card but want one must apply in person at the City-County Building.

Thamba and Court Administrator Andrea Newsom on Friday briefed the committee about a technological advance planned for the new cards.

The courts are testing technology that would allow an attorney with an ID card to print copies of documents from their tablet, smartphone or laptop device, Thamba said. A chip in the cards would allow the device to connect to a printer in one of the courts, then bill the attorney 4 cents per page.

“Our intent is to make it easier,” Thamba said. “It needs to be easy to use.”

He said the courts are in “test mode” on the upgrade and still determining which printers would best be suited to this kind of connectivity. He told the committee the wireless printer connection capability might not be accessible for about a year.

Executive Committee Chairman Judge David Certo advocated for a later expiration date for the new ID cards, but Newsom said the courts’ technology staff believed a two-year expiration cycle would be preferred. She noted that issuing the cards for a longer period might not allow the cards to be adapted to take advantage of technology as it evolves and becomes more accessible.

Thamba said the courts also were granted unprecedented access to the Indiana Roll of Attorneys. He said Indiana State Court Administration staff allowed the Marion Superior Court automated access to verify the good-standing status of all attorneys who ask for an ID card.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Such things are no more elections than those in the late, unlamented Soviet Union.

  2. It appears the police and prosecutors are allowed to change the rules halfway through the game to suit themselves. I am surprised that the congress has not yet eliminated the right to a trial in cases involving any type of forensic evidence. That would suit their foolish law and order police state views. I say we eliminate the statute of limitations for crimes committed by members of congress and other government employees. Of course they would never do that. They are all corrupt cowards!!!

  3. Poor Judge Brown probably thought that by slavishly serving the godz of the age her violations of 18th century concepts like due process and the rule of law would be overlooked. Mayhaps she was merely a Judge ahead of her time?

  4. in a lawyer discipline case Judge Brown, now removed, was presiding over a hearing about a lawyer accused of the supposedly heinous ethical violation of saying the words "Illegal immigrant." (IN re Barker) http://www.in.gov/judiciary/files/order-discipline-2013-55S00-1008-DI-429.pdf .... I wonder if when we compare the egregious violations of due process by Judge Brown, to her chiding of another lawyer for politically incorrectness, if there are any conclusions to be drawn about what kind of person, what kind of judge, what kind of apparatchik, is busy implementing the agenda of political correctness and making off-limits legit advocacy about an adverse party in a suit whose illegal alien status is relevant? I am just asking the question, the reader can make own conclsuion. Oh wait-- did I use the wrong adjective-- let me rephrase that, um undocumented alien?

  5. of course the bigger questions of whether or not the people want to pay for ANY bussing is off limits, due to the Supreme Court protecting the people from DEMOCRACY. Several decades hence from desegregation and bussing plans and we STILL need to be taking all this taxpayer money to combat mostly-imagined "discrimination" in the most obviously failed social program of the postwar period.

ADVERTISEMENT