ILNews

Indy attorney ID card fee to increase, but so should perks

Dave Stafford
September 27, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The fee lawyers pay for identification allowing them to avoid security checkpoint lines at the City-County Building in Indianapolis will increase, but so will the functionality of the cards, according to a proposal adopted Friday.

Attorneys will pay $35 for the ID effective Jan. 1, 2014, an increase from the current $25, according to the proposal adopted by the Marion Superior Court Executive Committee. The cards will continue to be issued on a two-year basis as they have been since they were instituted in 2002.

The courts’ chief technology officer Amitav Thamba said about 2,300 attorneys currently have ID cards, all of which expire Dec. 31. He told the committee that attorneys who have the cards should receive notices shortly, and attorneys in good standing will be able to renew with online payments. Attorneys who don’t have a card but want one must apply in person at the City-County Building.

Thamba and Court Administrator Andrea Newsom on Friday briefed the committee about a technological advance planned for the new cards.

The courts are testing technology that would allow an attorney with an ID card to print copies of documents from their tablet, smartphone or laptop device, Thamba said. A chip in the cards would allow the device to connect to a printer in one of the courts, then bill the attorney 4 cents per page.

“Our intent is to make it easier,” Thamba said. “It needs to be easy to use.”

He said the courts are in “test mode” on the upgrade and still determining which printers would best be suited to this kind of connectivity. He told the committee the wireless printer connection capability might not be accessible for about a year.

Executive Committee Chairman Judge David Certo advocated for a later expiration date for the new ID cards, but Newsom said the courts’ technology staff believed a two-year expiration cycle would be preferred. She noted that issuing the cards for a longer period might not allow the cards to be adapted to take advantage of technology as it evolves and becomes more accessible.

Thamba said the courts also were granted unprecedented access to the Indiana Roll of Attorneys. He said Indiana State Court Administration staff allowed the Marion Superior Court automated access to verify the good-standing status of all attorneys who ask for an ID card.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Justice has finally been served. So glad that Dr. Ley can finally sleep peacefully at night knowing the truth has finally come to the surface.

  2. While this right is guaranteed by our Constitution, it has in recent years been hampered by insurance companies, i.e.; the practice of the plaintiff's own insurance company intervening in an action and filing a lien against any proceeds paid to their insured. In essence, causing an additional financial hurdle for a plaintiff to overcome at trial in terms of overall award. In a very real sense an injured party in exercise of their right to trial by jury may be the only party in a cause that would end up with zero compensation.

  3. Why in the world would someone need a person to correct a transcript when a realtime court reporter could provide them with a transcript (rough draft) immediately?

  4. This article proved very enlightening. Right ahead of sitting the LSAT for the first time, I felt a sense of relief that a score of 141 was admitted to an Indiana Law School and did well under unique circumstances. While my GPA is currently 3.91 I fear standardized testing and hope that I too will get a good enough grade for acceptance here at home. Thanks so much for this informative post.

  5. No, Ron Drake is not running against incumbent Larry Bucshon. That’s totally wrong; and destructively misleading to say anything like that. All political candidates, including me in the 8th district, are facing voters, not incumbents. You should not firewall away any of voters’ options. We need them all now more than ever. Right? Y’all have for decades given the Ds and Rs free 24/7/365 coverage of taxpayer-supported promotion at the expense of all alternatives. That’s plenty of head-start, money-in-the-pocket advantage for parties and people that don’t need any more free immunities, powers, privileges and money denied all others. Now it’s time to play fair and let voters know that there are, in fact, options. Much, much better, and not-corrupt options. Liberty or Bust! Andy Horning Libertarian for IN08 USA House of Representatives Freedom, Indiana

ADVERTISEMENT