When Indianapolis attorney Joe Hogsett received the news Wednesday that he’d been chosen by President Barack Obama
to be the next U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Indiana, he wasn’t in court or handling a client’s legal
matters.
The senior partner at Bingham McHale was walking out of the Baseball Hall of Fame in Cooperstown, New York, where he’s
on vacation for his 12-year-old son’s weeklong baseball tournament.
“Walking out of the home of baseball when you get a call about the president giving you such an honor… You can’t
get any more American and patriotic than that,” the 53-year-old lawyer told Indiana Lawyer within an hour of
the White House announcement about 7:15 p.m. “What a uniquely American experience, and I’m so extremely honored
to be thought of for this.”
Limited in what he says publicly about the job prior to getting Senate approval, Hogsett said he’s looking forward
to the confirmation process and will leave comments about why he applied for the post until that’s complete. He’s
honored the president would tap him for such a critically important post, which hasn’t had a presidentially appointed
leader in nearly three years.
The most recent confirmed leader was Susan Brooks, who left in October 2007 to take a general counsel spot at Ivy Tech Community
College. Longtime second-in-command and previous interim leader Tim Morrison took over that role temporarily until a new nominee
could be found.
For the Southern District, the U.S. Attorney manages a staff of about 80 people that includes roughly 30 lawyers. Morrison
said the office in recent years typically handles an average 1,300 new civil cases and 1,300 pending ones, 350 new criminal
cases and about the same number of pending ones, as well as about 2,000 active financial litigation cases that have collected
about $20.1 million in the past three years.
Indiana’s Democratic Sen. Evan Bayh had recommended Hogsett, who’s been practicing since 1981 and had previously
served as chief of staff and senior advisor to Bayh during his governorship. Hogsett has long been expected to be the choice
for the post, given his experience in working with Bayh in the past, his time as the state Democratic Party chairman several
years ago and his service as Secretary of State during Bayh’s time as governor.
Bayh praised the nominee’s experience, intellect, and temperament and highlighted Hogsett’s supervision of numerous
fraud prosecutions during his time as Sectary of State.
Hogsett now handles individual employment contracts, non-compete agreements, sexual harassment and retaliation claims, and
immigration compliance, and he defends businesses in employment discrimination and civil rights litigation at the state and
federal levels. He also assists the firm’s government department in advising Hoosier cities, towns, and counties on
various issues. Hogsett graduated from what is now the Indiana University Maurer School of Law – Bloomington.
Now, Hogsett faces a confirmation process that requires U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee approval and confirmation by the
full Senate. Spokesman Brian Weiss in Bayh’s office in Washington, D.C., said there isn’t a set timetable for
when the Senate might take action on the nomination, but it could take longer with the pending confirmation of Solicitor General
Elena Kagan for the U.S. Supreme Court. Some have generally speculated that the process might wrap up by year’s end,
when Bayh leaves office after his decision to not return to the Senate.
If confirmed this year, Hogsett would be the state’s second new U.S. Attorney following the Senate’s approval
in May for interim leader David Capp to take that position for the Northern District of Indiana, following the elevation of
Joseph Van Bokkelen to the federal bench in mid-2007.














The court of appeals not only tries to rewrite or interpret the law to suit their fancy, now they choose play stupid as well. Every consideration must be given to pro se litigants, who are not held to the same standards as attorneys, as stated by,SCOTUS. I assume they didn't have a lawyer, since one wasn't mentioned and I strongly suggest thatb the rest of the, origional petitioners get back in there and fight for their rights.
the irony of situations like this is that the clients whom conour cheated are the ones who should be pulling hardest for him to remain free and keep his law license, so they have some hopes of him paying back. really bury the guy deep and then there will be little hope of restitution
Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.