ILNews

Indy attorney named Notre Dame AD

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A longtime partner at Baker & Daniels' Indianapolis office is leaving the law firm after 28 years to become the new athletic director at his alma mater, the University of Notre Dame.

After a quick stop in Beijing with his Summer Olympic clients, that is.

John "Jack" Swarbrick will start his new position officially Aug. 18. He'll be the university's 12th athletic director, which means the sports law and economic development attorney will leave the firm he's been with for almost three decades.

"Sports is a very important industry in Indianapolis, and this is an extraordinary job opportunity to get me away from a truly extraordinary law firm," the 54-year-old said.

Those in the Indianapolis sports world know his name well; Swarbrick is the former chairman of the Indiana Sports Corp., was instrumental in securing the NCAA headquarters here, and was a key player in getting the 2012 Super Bowl and men's basketball NCAA Tournament to come to Indianapolis.

Swarbrick said he's had a number of offers throughout the years, but this possibility started to seem interesting following head football coach Tyrone Willingham's 2004 firing, Charlie Weis' subsequent hiring, and the recent decision by Athletic Director Kevin White to leave the school for Duke University.

"I believe pretty passionately in this enterprise because it's a great way to complement the educational experiences," he said. "My vision revolves around the tradition at Notre Dame."

Through the years, Swarbrick's clients have included individual athletes, owners of sports teams, and organizations that sanction or conduct athletic competitions. He's served as general counsel for many national governing bodies of Olympic sports, including USA Gymnastics and USRowing.

He expects his legal background will be of great assistance in the new position because many items will probably have legal implications and he'll be able to consult with the governing board in understanding those issues.

"The principal difference is being responsible for a very large staff and being (in) a university environment," he said.

Much of his current job involves more consulting work than what he describes as traditional legal work, handling economic development projects, and licensing and deal negotiations, Swarbrick said he will focus most of his time wrapping that up before Aug. 1.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Whilst it may be true that Judges and Justices enjoy such freedom of time and effort, it certainly does not hold true for the average working person. To say that one must 1) take a day or a half day off work every 3 months, 2) gather a list of information including recent photographs, and 3) set up a time that is convenient for the local sheriff or other such office to complete the registry is more than a bit near-sighted. This may be procedural, and hence, in the near-sighted minds of the court, not 'punishment,' but it is in fact 'punishment.' The local sheriffs probably feel a little punished too by the overwork. Registries serve to punish the offender whilst simultaneously providing the public at large with a false sense of security. The false sense of security is dangerous to the public who may not exercise due diligence by thinking there are no offenders in their locale. In fact, the registry only informs them of those who have been convicted.

  2. Unfortunately, the court doesn't understand the difference between ebidta and adjusted ebidta as they clearly got the ruling wrong based on their misunderstanding

  3. A common refrain in the comments on this website comes from people who cannot locate attorneys willing put justice over retainers. At the same time the judiciary threatens to make pro bono work mandatory, seemingly noting the same concern. But what happens to attorneys who have the chumptzah to threatened the legal status quo in Indiana? Ask Gary Welch, ask Paul Ogden, ask me. Speak truth to power, suffer horrendously accordingly. No wonder Hoosier attorneys who want to keep in good graces merely chase the dollars ... the powers that be have no concerns as to those who are ever for sale to the highest bidder ... for those even willing to compromise for $$$ never allow either justice or constitutionality to cause them to stand up to injustice or unconstitutionality. And the bad apples in the Hoosier barrel, like this one, just keep rotting.

  4. I am one of Steele's victims and was taken for $6,000. I want my money back due to him doing nothing for me. I filed for divorce after a 16 year marriage and lost everything. My kids, my home, cars, money, pension. Every attorney I have talked to is not willing to help me. What can I do? I was told i can file a civil suit but you have to have all of Steelers info that I don't have. Of someone can please help me or tell me what info I need would be great.

  5. It would appear that news breaking on Drudge from the Hoosier state (link below) ties back to this Hoosier story from the beginning of the recent police disrespect period .... MCBA president Cassandra Bentley McNair issued the statement on behalf of the association Dec. 1. The association said it was “saddened and disappointed” by the decision not to indict Ferguson police officer Darren Wilson for shooting Michael Brown. “The MCBA does not believe this was a just outcome to this process, and is disheartened that the system we as lawyers are intended to uphold failed the African-American community in such a way,” the association stated. “This situation is not just about the death of Michael Brown, but the thousands of other African-Americans who are disproportionately targeted and killed by police officers.” http://www.thestarpress.com/story/news/local/2016/07/18/hate-cops-sign-prompts-controversy/87242664/

ADVERTISEMENT