ILNews

IndyBar Election Season Round-Up

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

iba-office-politics-fbox.gifNews and commentary on the upcoming election are nearly impossible to escape at this point. Take a break from the non-stop back and forth political banter with several upcoming election-related non-partisan events and programs.

Election Law Spotlight

The Government Practice section is sponsoring two upcoming continuing legal education programs that put the spotlight on the timely topic of election law. Both programs include one hour of continuing legal education credit and will take place at the IndyBar Education Center. Visit www.indybar.org for full details on each program and online registration.

The first, “Home is NOT Just ‘Where the Heart is’: Running for Office in the Age of Residency Challenges,” addresses the election law issue of the moment: candidate residency. Indiana, in particular, has been at the top of the list in bringing national attention to this, ironically, most local of issues. Andrew Mallon of Drewry Simmons Vornehm LLP will address the ins and outs of Indiana political residency law and the legal arguments that fuel this potent political phenomenon. This program will be held Thursday, September 20 from noon to 1 p.m.

The second will center around “Hot Topics in Election Law,” including voter identification, voting centers, electronic voting machines and much more. N. Davey Neal, Chief of Staff for Indiana’s Secretary of State Connie Lawson, will shed light on what the state’s Chief Election Officer is doing to ensure the integrity of Indiana’s voting process in this important year. This program will be held Thursday, October 4 from noon to 1 p.m.

Volunteer at the November Election

Take an active role in this year’s election by volunteering as an inspector, clerk or judge at the polls on November 6. To work a poll in Marion County, volunteers must be registered voters and live in Marion County. Volunteers must also attend a training session regardless of previous volunteer experience or training sessions attended in the past.

The Government Practice Section will host a free volunteer training session on Thursday, October 11 from 9 a.m. to noon. Featuring Marion County Clerk Beth White, the program will also include three free hours of continuing legal education credit and a light breakfast. Registration for the training is accessible at www.indybar.org.

Let’s Educate Fellow Voters

A recent survey unveiled that two-thirds of Americans can’t name one United States Supreme Court Justice. Imagine the results of that survey if that question were taken down to a local level. How many Hoosiers could name a state Supreme Court Justice, an appellate judge, a superior court judge? While judicial retention votes are unlikely to be the most exciting part of November’s General Election, any step toward educating the public on the judiciary is a positive one.

Spurred by an effort to educate Indiana voters, the Division of State Court Administration created www.in.gov/judiciary/retention, a site meant to share relevant information on the six Indiana appellate court judges who will be up for retention vote this November with the public. Voters will decide “yes” or “no” on whether to retain each judge, and the site includes helpful information, including biographies and judicial opinions, to assist voters in making an informed decision. Of the six judges, four are IndyBar members—Justice Steven David, Judge John Baker, Judge Nancy Vaidik and Judge Paul Mathias.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. It appears the police and prosecutors are allowed to change the rules halfway through the game to suit themselves. I am surprised that the congress has not yet eliminated the right to a trial in cases involving any type of forensic evidence. That would suit their foolish law and order police state views. I say we eliminate the statute of limitations for crimes committed by members of congress and other government employees. Of course they would never do that. They are all corrupt cowards!!!

  2. Poor Judge Brown probably thought that by slavishly serving the godz of the age her violations of 18th century concepts like due process and the rule of law would be overlooked. Mayhaps she was merely a Judge ahead of her time?

  3. in a lawyer discipline case Judge Brown, now removed, was presiding over a hearing about a lawyer accused of the supposedly heinous ethical violation of saying the words "Illegal immigrant." (IN re Barker) http://www.in.gov/judiciary/files/order-discipline-2013-55S00-1008-DI-429.pdf .... I wonder if when we compare the egregious violations of due process by Judge Brown, to her chiding of another lawyer for politically incorrectness, if there are any conclusions to be drawn about what kind of person, what kind of judge, what kind of apparatchik, is busy implementing the agenda of political correctness and making off-limits legit advocacy about an adverse party in a suit whose illegal alien status is relevant? I am just asking the question, the reader can make own conclsuion. Oh wait-- did I use the wrong adjective-- let me rephrase that, um undocumented alien?

  4. of course the bigger questions of whether or not the people want to pay for ANY bussing is off limits, due to the Supreme Court protecting the people from DEMOCRACY. Several decades hence from desegregation and bussing plans and we STILL need to be taking all this taxpayer money to combat mostly-imagined "discrimination" in the most obviously failed social program of the postwar period.

  5. You can put your photos anywhere you like... When someone steals it they know it doesn't belong to them. And, a man getting a divorce is automatically not a nice guy...? That's ridiculous. Since when is need of money a conflict of interest? That would mean that no one should have a job unless they are already financially solvent without a job... A photographer is also under no obligation to use a watermark (again, people know when a photo doesn't belong to them) or provide contact information. Hey, he didn't make it easy for me to pay him so I'll just take it! Well heck, might as well walk out of the grocery store with a cart full of food because the lines are too long and you don't find that convenient. "Only in Indiana." Oh, now you're passing judgement on an entire state... What state do you live in? I need to characterize everyone in your state as ignorant and opinionated. And the final bit of ignorance; assuming a photo anyone would want is lucky and then how much does your camera have to cost to make it a good photo, in your obviously relevant opinion?

ADVERTISEMENT