ILNews

IndyBar: I am humbled

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Kelley J. Johnson, 2013 Indianapolis Bar Foundation President Cohen & Malad, LLP
 

johnson-kelly--iba Johnson

I tell my 6-year-old and my 8-year-old that being your Indianapolis Bar Foundation President is a very, very important job and a big responsibility. My kids, however, seem unimpressed at my undertaking and, without fail, do their best to keep me humble. They constantly tell me that I am old; that I am weird; and no matter how many Top 40 songs I can sing back to them – that I am so not cool.

During my service this year as your Foundation President, I am also continually humbled by all of you – IndyBar members – albeit in a much nicer way than my children. As you know, our Foundation helps fund incredible IndyBar programs and initiatives, as well as the yearly Impact Fund grant that is awarded to a deserving community initiative. However, without you, our Foundation simply would not exist without each of your generous donations. I know that, too, and yet I am still humbled by your acts of generosity.

For example, in May I attended the graduation of Bar Leader Series Class X, where each team of five young attorneys presented their successes, challenges and benefits they gave to others during their self-created community service projects. The BLS graduations are a much anticipated celebration after these attorneys, in addition to their paying jobs, work on developing and executing these projects during the nine-month series. As I was leaving the half-day celebration, one of the class members approached me and handed me a wad – and I do mean a wad – of cash that Class X put together to donate to the Foundation. It was their day, and yet they thought of the Foundation. Wow! I was humbled.

In another instance of humility, one of our judicial members recently received an award from the prestigious Richard Lugar Excellence in Public Service Series, which came with an honorarium. This judge generously donated her honoraria to the Foundation. Again, I was humbled.

For the first time at Bench Bar, our Foundation Board of Directors sought to raise visibility and money for the Foundation and again, you IndyBar members didn’t disappoint. We had over 100 members play at our Trivia Night with our volunteer hosts James Bell and Adam Christensen. We also had overwhelming participation in the raffle drawings conducted at dinner and during the trivia night. We recognized those who previously donated to the Foundation with distinct lanyards. Many of you traded in your regular lanyards for the Impact of One lanyards, showing your pride for the Foundation. You came through again. I was humbled.

I have yet to mention the numerous law firms that are contributing to our Lawyer Links Classic this month and our Evening Under the Stars gala in September, in addition to the several, unsolicited individual donations that have come in through the mail, in person and through our online donation link.

Thank you, to each and every one of you who have donated to your Foundation this year. Most importantly, I thank you from the bottom of my heart for keeping me humble and being a little bit nicer than my kids in doing so.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Just an aside, but regardless of the outcome, I 'm proud of Judge William Hughes. He was the original magistrate on the Home place issue. He ruled for Home Place, and was primaried by Brainard for it. Their tool Poindexter failed to unseat Hughes, who won support for his honesty and courage throughout the county, and he was reelected Judge of Hamilton County's Superior Court. You can still stand for something and survive. Thanks, Judge Hughes!

  2. CCHP's real accomplishment is the 2015 law signed by Gov Pence that basically outlaws any annexation that is forced where a 65% majority of landowners in the affected area disagree. Regardless of whether HP wins or loses, the citizens of Indiana will not have another fiasco like this. The law Gov Pence signed is a direct result of this malgovernance.

  3. I gave tempparry guardship to a friend of my granddaughter in 2012. I went to prison. I had custody. My daughter went to prison to. We are out. My daughter gave me custody but can get her back. She was not order to give me custody . but now we want granddaughter back from friend. She's 14 now. What rights do we have

  4. This sure is not what most who value good governance consider the Rule of Law to entail: "In a letter dated March 2, which Brizzi forwarded to IBJ, the commission dismissed the grievance “on grounds that there is not reasonable cause to believe that you are guilty of misconduct.”" Yet two month later reasonable cause does exist? (Or is the commission forging ahead, the need for reasonable belief be damned? -- A seeming violation of the Rules of Profession Ethics on the part of the commission) Could the rule of law theory cause one to believe that an explanation is in order? Could it be that Hoosier attorneys live under Imperial Law (which is also a t-word that rhymes with infamy) in which the Platonic guardians can do no wrong and never owe the plebeian class any explanation for their powerful actions. (Might makes it right?) Could this be a case of politics directing the commission, as celebrated IU Mauer Professor (the late) Patrick Baude warned was happening 20 years ago in his controversial (whisteblowing) ethics lecture on a quite similar topic: http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1498&context=ilj

  5. I have a case presently pending cert review before the SCOTUS that reveals just how Indiana regulates the bar. I have been denied licensure for life for holding the wrong views and questioning the grand inquisitors as to their duties as to state and federal constitutional due process. True story: https://www.scribd.com/doc/299040839/2016Petitionforcert-to-SCOTUS Shorter, Amici brief serving to frame issue as misuse of govt licensure: https://www.scribd.com/doc/312841269/Thomas-More-Society-Amicus-Brown-v-Ind-Bd-of-Law-Examiners

ADVERTISEMENT