ILNews

IndyBar: Interrogatories - Donald R. Lundberg

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

By Tyler D. Helmond, Voyles Zahn & Paul
 

Lundberg Don Lundberg

Donald R. Lundberg
Deputy General Counsel, Barnes & Thornburg

He is a graduate of the Indiana University Maurer School of Law – Bloomington. He served as Director of Litigation at the Legal Services Organization of Indiana and as the Executive Secretary of the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission before joining Barnes & Thornburg LLP. He is Donald Lundberg, and he has been served with interrogatories.

Q You spent about 20 years at the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission before leaving for private practice. What has been the biggest change?
A Remember, before that I was a lawyer for 15 years with what is now Indiana Legal Services. The biggest change for me has been experiencing the entrepreneurial aspects of the practice of law. New life experiences are good. I have been enjoying this one.


Q What is your default Starbucks order?
A Cuppa Joe. Black, no sugar. I’m easy to please.


Q If you decided to start tweeting, what would your twitter handle be?
Your question assumes I do not tweet. I would be offended if it weren’t true. Never having thought about it before, I’d draw on my Res Gestae column and select @EthicsCurbstone.


Q What is your favorite part about practicing at Barnes and Thornburg?
A Easy. The great colleagues and clients. In every legal job I have had, the things that have sustained me in the long run are the personal relationships.


Q If you had the opportunity to meet one deceased jurist through time travel, who would it be and why?
A I’d say Learned Hand, if for no other reason than it’s such a great name. And then there’s the fact that he had one of the great legal minds. The meeting would be embarrassing though, since I would be a blithering idiot.


Q Who are the lawyers you admire most?
A The ones who have the passion to serve their clients well, with the humanity to avoid being jerks to their fellow lawyers.


Q Letterman or Leno?
A What a question. Letterman. Are you really from around here?


Q If you were to give a law school commencement address to one of the classes of 2014, what would you say?
A I think the title might be “The Importance of Plan B.” Most folks who go to law school think they will do well. It is simple math that half of the class will do less well (according to GPA) than the other half. Opportunities to practice in established firms will be difficult for many new law graduates. And striking out on one’s own can be terrifying. Don’t get me wrong, I love being a lawyer and would never discourage someone from following a passion for the law into practice. In fact, the practice of law is no longer (if it ever was) a place for lawyers without passion for the work. But there are alternatives to traditional law practice that can be at least as gratifying and rewarding. Single-minded focus on practicing law can blind recent law graduates (and practicing lawyers, for that matter) to neat opportunities for which a law degree can be helpful, even if it is not necessary. As I think about it, this would be a depressing commencement address, which explains why I have never given one. I pity the law school commencement speakers of today who have to capture the excitement of becoming eligible for admission to practice while remaining realistic about the prospects.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Hmmmmm ..... How does the good doctor's spells work on tyrants and unelected bureacrats with nearly unchecked power employing in closed hearings employing ad hoc procedures? Just askin'. ... Happy independence day to any and all out there who are "free" ... Unlike me.

  2. Today, I want to use this opportunity to tell everyone about Dr agbuza of agbuzaodera(at)gmail. com, on how he help me reunited with my husband after 2 months of divorce.My husband divorce me because he saw another woman in his office and he said to me that he is no longer in love with me anymore and decide to divorce me.I seek help from the Net and i saw good talk about Dr agbuza and i contact him and explain my problem to him and he cast a spell for me which i use to get my husband back within 2 days.am totally happy because there is no reparations and side-effect. If you need his help Email him at agbuzaodera(at)gmail. com

  3. The practitioners and judges who hail E-filing as the Saviour of the West need to contain their respective excitements. E-filing is federal court requires the practitioner to cram his motion practice into pigeonholes created by IT people. Compound motions or those seeking alternative relief are effectively barred, unless the practitioner wants to receive a tart note from some functionary admonishing about the "problem". E-filing is just another method by which courts and judges transfer their burden to practitioners, who are the really the only powerless components of the system. Of COURSE it is easier for the court to require all of its imput to conform to certain formats, but this imposition does NOT improve the quality of the practice of law and does NOT improve the ability of the practitioner to advocate for his client or to fashion pleadings that exactly conform to his client's best interests. And we should be very wary of the disingenuous pablum about the costs. The courts will find a way to stick it to the practitioner. Lake County is a VERY good example of this rapaciousness. Any one who does not believe this is invited to review the various special fees that system imposes upon practitioners- as practitioners- and upon each case ON TOP of the court costs normal in every case manually filed. Jurisprudence according to Aldous Huxley.

  4. Any attorneys who practice in federal court should be able to say the same as I can ... efiling is great. I have been doing it in fed court since it started way back. Pacer has its drawbacks, but the ability to hit an e-docket and pull up anything and everything onscreen is a huge plus for a litigator, eps the sole practitioner, who lacks a filing clerk and the paralegal support of large firms. Were I an Indiana attorney I would welcome this great step forward.

  5. Can we get full disclosure on lobbyist's payments to legislatures such as Mr Buck? AS long as there are idiots that are disrespectful of neighbors and intent on shooting fireworks every night, some kind of regulations are needed.

ADVERTISEMENT