Kiply Drew knows her job as an in-house counsel for the one of the country’s top 100 universities means every day is
different.
That’s why the associate general counsel at Indiana University can don any number of fun titles colleagues use when
referring to the type of work she does each day: the construction queen, eviction queen, and mold or storm water queen. On
occasion, she might even have to become a “mattress attorney” to navigate the varying legal issues that have come
before her in the 16 years she’s been with the Bloomington-based school.
While those designations bring laughs internally and are all in good fun, they serve as gentle reminders for Drew about how
quickly her job can change with every phone call or e-mail.
Indiana University associate general counsel Kiply Drew has worked at the Bloomington campus for 16 years after leaving
private practice. She said you have to be prepared for anything. (Photo submitted)
“You truly never know what comes with the next phone call,” she said. “You have to be prepared for anything,
and the word ‘generalist’ almost doesn’t cover everything you have to become a mini-expert on. But I wouldn’t
have it any other way.”
Drew’s 21-year career has taken her from private practice to the corporate counsel arena, and paved the way for her
most recent application and interview for an opening at the Indiana Supreme Court where she clerked right after law school.
Though she was one of nine semi-finalists considered for the post and didn’t make the final cut, Drew has no regrets
and said the experience has at least caused her to reflect more on her role in the legal community
“It’s probably too soon to speculate what kind of impact this may have on my career,” she said. “Being
selected as a semi-finalist and contemplating the prospect of actually joining them on the court was exciting and inspiring.
But being in-house at IU has been so varied, so interesting and, frankly, so all-consuming that I have not given much thought
to pursuing a career change.”
Graduating in 1989 from what’s now Indiana University Maurer School of Law – Bloomington, Drew took her first
position clerking for Justice Roger DeBruler on the state’s highest court before going to work for the environmental
group at Barnes & Thornburg in Indianapolis. She returned to her beloved Bloomington in February 1994 as an associate
at Andrews Harrell Mann Chapman & Coyne, but within a few months Drew’s career took a decisive, unexpected turn.
Associate general counsel Alvin York at IU died of a heart attack and the university asked the Bloomington firm to help.
Drew took on the task, assigned to help the university’s legal department assess and complete what York had been working
on at the time of his death. She spent half days at IU billing the university as a firm client, and then went back to the
firm for the afternoons to tend to her other clients.
That summer, IU decided to expand the legal department and add another lawyer. Drew wondered about applying but wasn’t
planning on it until her husband nudged her to do so. She started Aug. 1, 1994, joining four other associate general counsels.
In her in-house role, Drew has handled a wide variety of legal issues and describes herself as one of the few remaining “general
practitioners” left. Some of the lawyers have specific topics they might know best, and the team turns to them first,
but they all have some level of familiarity with those topics, Drew said. For example, when she started, her background in
environmental law meant that she was the environmental lawyer for a time. That led to her titles of “mold queen”
and “storm water queen.” Since then, she’s taken on more of a focus with construction issues, Drew said.
“As time passes, you develop these areas of expertise that maybe started out because of a cold call from someone at
the university,” she said. “Then, they call you first the next time something comes up.”
For the most interesting aspects of her job, Drew immediately perks up when talking about constitutional issues. She sees
situations ranging from due process and housing rights to police force search-and-seizure issues. With the university grounds
being public places and being state-owned, they always have to be mindful of what might be constitutionally off limits. Drew
recalls the past presidential election when two candidates visited and rented Assembly Hall for speeches, and the legal team
had to make sure they weren’t infringing on any legalities there.
First Amendment issues have been challenging and engaging to her personally, and she enjoys that work the most. But aside
from all that, Drew also deals with budget topics and contracting, and those three elements are what she says makes the job
unique for the in-house world.
“Universities are a hybrid creature, and I like that variety the best,” she said. “We’re very comparable
to a small city or corporation, but we’re not and in many ways and are very corporate in some of our dealings.”
On the flip side, she said one aspect she enjoys the least is being the “eviction queen” when it comes to removing
students from campus. Drew pointed out that IU is known as the “nicest landlord in town” for allowing students
to remain through the end of a semester.
Then there are other issues that arise at a moment’s notice, Drew said in reflecting on one instance in particular.
At the time, she’d been caught up on a constitutional free-speech issue about how demonstrations could take place on
campus. Drew was at her desk working when she heard a “ping” from her computer regarding a new e-mail.
“I turned around to look at the e-mail that didn’t have any subject line or context, just asked a question: ‘Can
we sell used mattresses?’” Drew said. “I blinked my eyes and didn’t know what to think.”
Picking up the phone, she learned that the employee was asking how the IU hotel – that was buying all new mattresses
– could dispose of the used ones. Her research taught her that the university could sell them, as long as they met health
department regulations.
“Thankfully, that’s the only time I’ve had to be a mattress lawyer. But it just shows that you have to
be prepared for anything,” she said.
She also directs and acts as university liaison to outside counsel who are hired to represent IU in litigation. That means
reviewing and drafting documents that have to be filed in state and federal courts, and she keeps her internal clients informed
about the case status.
“We’re about problem prevention, rather than disaster recovery,” she said. “That means always having
to look at would could be a small problem now but turn into something bigger down the road.”
Her boss, vice president and general counsel Dottie Frapwell, said Drew is a crucial member of the legal team that can’t
be replaced. She echoed the thoughts that the in-house lifestyle is much different than a traditional law firm or public sector
position in many ways, but it’s also the same in other situations.
“Being a university general counsel, you’ve got to know a little about everything,” she said. “Some
have said it’s like rowing on a river that’s a mile wide and an inch deep, and no single day is the same.”
For Drew, being able to walk around the campus and see her legal work transformed into practical results is what she enjoys
the most about her position. When she enters the IU Auditorium and sees murals on the walls that were refurbished about a
decade ago, she knows that her work with people at the museum and consortium to get that done was a critical component.
“When I go in there and look at those murals, I feel like I had a part of that,” she said. “That experience
of being able to look around and see that you contributed to something, you know that you’re part of something good.”•














G. Michael Witte letter states he's suspended for three years. The case that got him suspended is identical to my estate case, including havin the Late Judge Deiter recuse himself because Newman had a conflict of interest with the judge. His Modus Operandi is nearly identical.
SIGNED BY G. MICHAEL WITTE EXECUTIVE SECRETARY INDIANA SUPREME COURT DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION DATED MAY 17, 2012.
Your 6th complaint against Lawrence T. Newman filed on 4/12/2012. On 1/31/12, the Indiana Supreme Court entered an order suspending Lawrence T. Newman’s law license for a period of three years. More important, even after three years, Lawrence Todd Newman will not get his license back unless and until he goes through a separate proceeding to prove that he is fit to practice law. This is not an easy process, and the burden is upon Lawrence T. Newman to prove by clear and convincing evidence that he is fit to return to practice.
Because of the length of Lawrence T. Newman’s license suspension and the fact he may never succeed in getting his law license reinstated, we are not opening an investigation file at this time.
Should Lawrence T. Newman seek reinstatement in the future, we will open your file and ask Lawrence T. Newman to address your grievance as part of his burden of proving fitness. We have attempted to notify Lawrence T. Newman that this will be required of him.
It may disappoint you to hear that we will be doing nothing on your grievance at this time. However, the most our office can ever accomplish is to take away a lawyer’s license to practice law. We have already done that, albeit as a result of misconduct in cases other than your own. It makes better sense for our office to focus its limited resources on cases where the lawyers are still actively practicing law.
Is there any justice in the Marion County Superior Court Civil Division? I am the unfortunate victim of a retaliatory lawsuit brought by Lawrence Todd Newman, the attorney from an estate case on which I worked as a unsupervised personal representative in 2006. The contract agreement for that case stated that the estate would be responsible for all attorney fees, but Newman refused to close the nearly insolvent estate when my duties were complete and his fees were paid. Instead, he tried to extort additional attorney fees from me by keeping the case open to address a wrongful death claim, despite the estate’s heir’s lack of interest in pursuing it and an expert doctor’s opinion that it would not be worth doing so. He also knowingly deceived me into believing that a “closing statement” was needed to close the estate, even though this requirement had actually been waived by the estate’s heir. The heir’s attorney filed a motion to have Newman removed from the case. After the court closed the probate case with prejudice (barred from further litigation) Newman illegally re-opened the case in another courtroom.
As a result of complaints filed against him for these and similar actions, Newman has been suspended from practicing law for 18 months by the Indiana Disciplinary Commission. In retaliation, he has filed suit against me demanding additional attorney fees for the 2006 estate case, despite the fact that I made no agreement stating that I would pay any fees from my own assets on behalf of the estate. This lawsuit violates the rules of ethics, due process of law, and equal protection of law. Newman has been allowed to file ridiculous pleadings at an alarming rate and has been supported by a biased court system. Judge Carroll refuses to recuse himself from the case despite the fact that, by his own admission, he intends to grant Newman sanctions regardless of the evidence. When my former counsel discovered that the previous judge on the case, Judge Sosin, was a long-time close friend of Newman’s family, Judge Carroll commented for the record during a hearing that Judge Sosin in so many words “he finds the door “was weak for recusing himself from the case as a result of this obvious conflict of interest.
This case is a public policy issue. Statutes put in place to protect unsupervised personal representatives in probate matters are being ignored. This case will affect thousands of individuals involved in probating and the personal representation of estates. Justice cannot possibly be served as long as a biased judge is allowed to defend a “vexatious litigant,” as Newman has been described by Judge Logan in Bradenton, Florida court. If there is any justice in the Marion County Superior Court Civil Division, this case against me will be dismissed with prejudice.
Every affront to decency and every style adopted by criminals is not per se a constituttional violation. Only fools believe or espouse that.
This was an unnecessary change in law, a needless fiddling with a tax that impacted very very few hoosiers, but one that erodes a tax base benefitting very many hoosiers. Just because some people wanted to chalk up a "tax cut" on their legislative brag-list, and didnt give a fig about replacing the revenue any other way. Really stupid. I am a republican my whole life and this just shames me like hell. I have to use a fake name over this because I know my fellow republicans are all brain washed over tax cutting too.