ILNews

International students to discuss legal systems of home countries

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law will hold its inaugural International Student Speakers Series on Thursday, when students and alumni from China, Azerbaijan, Pakistan, Taiwan, Egypt and Germany will talk about law in their home countries.

The talk, “Global Legal Education in the Twenty-First Century,” is from 4:30 to 6 p.m. at Inlow Hall, Wynne Courtroom and Conour Atrium, 530 W. New York St., Indianapolis.

Speakers include Fang Xu, who was a trial court judge in China for 11 years and is president of the Master of Laws Association at IU Robert H. McKinney School of Law; Ummi Jalilova, who as a lawyer working for the government of Azerbaijan, established the cooperation with European Union member countries on combating transnational crimes; Ahmed Faheem, who was a lawyer in Pakistan before enrolling as an LL.M student in the Intellectual Property Track at the Indianapolis law school; Yen-Chia Chen, who served as legal counsel at the Law and Regulation Commission of Taipei City Government in Taiwan before coming to Indiana; Bianca Buechner, of Germany, who is a research assistant for the IU Center for Bioethics and Center for Law and Health; and Mohamed ‘Arafa and Ahmed Shehata, both of Egypt. ‘Arafa will begin teaching Islamic law as an adjunct professor at the school this fall. Shehata was a corporate lawyer overseas before coming to Indiana to study international and comparative law.

The event is free and open to the public. For additional information, contact professor Karen Bravo, Associate Dean for International Affairs at kbravo@iupui.edu.



 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I have had an ongoing custody case for 6 yrs. I should have been the sole legal custodial parent but was a victim of a vindictive ex and the system biasedly supported him. He is an alcoholic and doesn't even have a license for two yrs now after his 2nd DUI. Fast frwd 6 yrs later my kids are suffering poor nutritional health, psychological issues, failing in school, have NO MD and the GAL could care less, DCS doesn't care. The child isn't getting his ADHD med he needs and will not succeed in life living this way. NO one will HELP our family.I tried for over 6 yrs. The judge called me an idiot for not knowing how to enter evidence and the last hearing was 8 mths ago. That in itself is unjust! The kids want to be with their Mother! They are being alienated from her and fed lies by their Father! I was hit in a car accident 3 yrs ago and am declared handicapped myself. Poor poor way to treat the indigent in Indiana!

  2. The Indiana DOE released the 2015-2016 school grades in Dec 2016 and my local elementary school is a "C" grade school. Look at the MCCSC boundary maps and how all of the most affluent neighborhoods have the best performance. It is no surprise that obtaining residency in the "A" school boundaries cost 1.5 to 3 times as much. As a parent I should have more options than my "C" school without needing to pay the premium to live in the affluent parts of town. If the charter were authorized by a non-religious school the plaintiffs would still be against it because it would still be taking per-pupil money from them. They are hiding behind the guise of religion as a basis for their argument when this is clearly all about money and nothing else.

  3. This is a horrible headline. The article is about challenging the ability of Grace College to serve as an authorizer. 7 Oaks is not a religiously affiliated school

  4. Congratulations to Judge Carmichael for making it to the final three! She is an outstanding Judge and the people of Indiana will benefit tremendously if/when she is chosen.

  5. The headline change to from "religious" to "religious-affiliated" is still inaccurate and terribly misleading.

ADVERTISEMENT