One by one, attorneys are appearing before the seven-member Indiana Judicial Nominating Commission to explain why they should
be the next Indiana Supreme Court justice.
Today is the first round of interviews for 19 of those interested in replacing Justice Theodore Boehm on the Supreme Court.
Justice Boehm will retire in September. The remaining 15 people will be interviewed Wednesday.
Some applicants described being a justice as a calling, while others said they spent a lifetime preparing for this. Others
described it more as the next logical step in their legal careers.
“It would be the honor of my life to be considered for this position,” said Morgan Superior Judge Jane Spencer Craney, the sixth person interviewed today.
Like her fellow applicants, Judge Craney delved into her experience as a trial judge and prosecutor, but also discussed her
interest in being a community leader as the current justices are.
Indianapolis criminal defense attorney Monica Foster said being a justice would be “the coolest job you could have.” She
found the 40 arguments she’s made before the high court to be the most exhilarating time of her career. She talked about
her role representing the Mexican government and how she enjoys generally “testing the boundaries of the Constitution.”
Commission member John Trimble told her at one point that her “passion leaped off the page of her application.”
Indiana
Court of Appeals Judge Elaine Brown is the only appellate court applicant. She went before the nominating commission less
than three years ago when she applied for the Court of Appeals.
Only five years removed from private practice with both trial and appellate court experience, she described herself as a
balanced “no-risk” choice. Judge Brown outlined specific goals if appointed: examining prison populations and
sentencing, personal and social responsibility being taught in schools, and family law being less adversarial.
“This is not your father’s or grandfather’s Supreme Court. This is a supreme opportunity,” she said.
Sen.
Brent Steele, R-Bedford, spoke generally about his legislative experience and said he’d have a lot to learn.
“We as a society are separated from anarchy only by our ballot and jury box,” he said. “I can give back
in both of those ways.”
Also interviewing this morning were Indianapolis attorney Ellen Boshkoff, Baker & Daniels; Fishers attorney Sean M. Clapp of Clapp Ferrucci; Hamilton Superior Judge Steven R. Nation; Zionsville attorney Yasmin L. Stump; and Indianapolis attorney Judy L. Woods.
Interviewing this afternoon are Clark Superior Judge Vicki L. Carmichael; Bloomington attorney Kiply Drew, associate general counsel at Indiana University; Allen Superior Judge Francis C. Gull; Lawrence County deputy prosecutor Christine Talley Haseman; Fountain Circuit Judge Susan Orr Henderson; Fort Wayne attorney Christine Marcuccilli, Rothberg Logan & Warsco; Pendleton attorney Bryce D. Owens; Taft Stettinius & Hollister attorney Geoffrey G. Slaughter; Miami Circuit Judge Robert A. Spahr; and Logansport attorney Donald J. Tribbett.
After the interviews are complete, the commission should decide on the semi-finalists and announce the names Wednesday or
Thursday. The semi-finalists will be interviewed July 30, with the governor selecting the next justice from those three.














vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.
Jack, I was only responding to bill's comment of tying everybody in government together. I agree with you though, it takes one bad apple to ruin the bunch.. As in any profession. What's truly unfair is when somebody violates someone's trust and takes complete advantage of someone
John’s comment is unfair. The majority of attorneys can be trusted. Unfortunately, all it takes is one greedy, unscrupulous, immoral attorney to jade the public.