Gov. Mitch Daniels fired the state’s top utility regulator recently, citing ethical concerns about how a now-former
administrative law judge presided over cases involving a regulated energy company leading up to his taking a job there.
The governor’s actions told those serving as state agency ALJs that the spirit of a mandatory one-year cooling-off
rule applies to them and they should be careful about considering outside employment while presiding as neutral parties over
administrative matters. That also raised more questions for an Indiana State Bar Association Legal Ethics Committee task force
that’s been studying ALJ-specific issues since January.
“We are still in the information-gathering process, and this is much bigger than we all had anticipated,” said
Vicki Wright, an attorney at Krieg DeVault who chairs the specialized task force.
The group has been studying the scope of ALJ duties and ethical obligations and whether those individuals should be required
to have law licenses. The plan was to issue a report at the ISBA board of governors meeting Oct. 15, but it isn’t ready,
Wright said. She added that the governor’s recent actions have prompted more review.
In terminating attorney David Lott Hardy as Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission chairman, the governor specifically pointed
to the reason being the recent departure of general counsel Scott Storms, who took a job in late September as a lawyer in
Duke Energy’s regulatory division.
Storms, who was admitted to the bar in 1989, was the agency’s chief legal advisor and served as ALJ. The governor said
his taking a job somewhere directly involved in cases he’d recently presided over raised the “appearance of impropriety.”
David Pippen, the governor’s general counsel, sent a memo to all agency heads outlining an internal review that found
Storms had been communicating with Duke about a job even while he was presiding over administrative hearings concerning the
energy company.
“Additionally, the agency head was aware of the communications and did not remove the lawyer from matters for which
the lawyer was now conflicted,” Pippen said in his memo, noting that Daniels has directed that administrative opinions
over which Storms presided be reopened and reviewed “to ensure no undue influence was exerted in the decisions.”
In the memo, Pippen wrote that the governor considers the one-year cooling-off period to apply to anyone at the ALJ level,
and that this matter specifically has been referred to the Inspector General to determine if any laws were broken or whether
misinformation was presented to the Indiana Ethics Commission.
Though it’s not outlined which Duke cases are at issue, Storms had presided over a handful of matters involving the
company – most significantly one relating to cost overruns at Duke’s Edwardsport generating plant. After questions
arose late last month about Storms’ departure and new position, Duke said that he and the company had previously sought
an advisory opinion from the commission about whether Storms would be subject to that one-year cooling-off period before being
allowed to take a job at Duke. The commission found it didn’t apply because Storms wasn’t involved in the direct
decision-making, but the panel also found that he couldn’t be involved as an attorney at Duke in any matters he might
have presided over while working as an ALJ.
Following the governor’s announcement, the fallout worsened as Duke said it was placing Storms on administrative leave
“pending the completion of a full evaluation.” The company did the same with its president and chief executive
officer of Indiana operations, Mike Reed, who had started with Duke in June after serving as commissioner of the Indiana Department
of Transportation. Reed previously served as executive director of the IURC under Daniels from 2006 to 2009.
Pippen reiterated that no ALJ who presides over information-gathering or order-drafting matters should engage in communications
with regulated industries regarding potential jobs without recusing him or herself from cases involving that company.
Daniels immediately appointed as the new IURC chairman Jim Atterholt, who serves on the commission and is the state’s
former insurance commissioner.
Hearing about the IURC matter, Wright said the task force is now using that issue to examine what it should do on the ALJ
front.
“We’re stepping a little out of our subject matter when talking about non-lawyers,” she said. “I’m
not sure where the end-product will end up, but we’re meeting with and reaching out to the executive branch to brainstorm.”
Rehearing "Unique type of judging: State bar association exploring ethical concerns about ALJs" IL Dec. 23, 2009-Jan.
5, 2010














Jack, I was only responding to bill's comment of tying everybody in government together. I agree with you though, it takes one bad apple to ruin the bunch.. As in any profession. What's truly unfair is when somebody violates someone's trust and takes complete advantage of someone
John’s comment is unfair. The majority of attorneys can be trusted. Unfortunately, all it takes is one greedy, unscrupulous, immoral attorney to jade the public.
In regards to bill's comment about trusting the cover meant. We can trust them about as much as we can trust attorneys'.
This is disturbing to learn...
Yikes!