ILNews

IU McKinney student uses his love of golf to raise money for scholarships

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

While some people dream about it, Luke Bielawski will actually be spending his entire summer swinging a golf club.

The student at the Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law plans to hit a golf ball for 10 hours a day from roughly Monterey, Calif., to Charleston, S.C., to raise money for Providence Cristo Rey High School in Indianapolis. Bielawski expects the 3,000-plus mile journey to take anywhere from 95 to 110 days and include approximately 48,000 swings and 3,200 lost golf balls.

bielawski-preparation-15col.jpg Luke Bielawski, a student at Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law, practices his swing along an Indiana country road. (Submitted photo)

The fundraiser, dubbed “From Tee to Shining Tee,” combines Bielawski’s passion for helping young people with his love of golf. He considers himself blessed to have been able to attend Cathedral High School in Indianapolis, and he wants to help economically disadvantaged youth to have the same opportunity he had to attend a college preparatory program.

Bielawski is confident he can raise $100,000 to fund 12 scholarships.

He was searching for a way to support Providence Cristo Rey when, watching the movie “Forrest Gump” and seeing the character run across the country, he hit upon the idea of whacking a golf ball from the Pacific Ocean to the Atlantic Ocean. Bielawski has since established his own 501(c)3 nonprofit, Get On The Green, to use golf to raise funds for local, regional and national charities.

“Golf is a beautiful game,” Bielawski said.

Last summer he adjusted his hours at his summer job assisting in-house counsel, arriving by 5:30 or 6 a.m., so he could leave in the mid-afternoon and have six hours on the green. When winter came, he began spending his evenings in his garage hitting a few hundred golf balls into a net.

With the arrival of spring, he has moved back outside and practiced for his summer journey by logging a few miles hitting golf balls and walking across cornfields.

Bielawski will tee off in California on May 7. After his final exam ends at 9 p.m. May 3, he will meet his cousin Nick Bielawski in the parking lot on the Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis campus and start driving in a donated recreational vehicle to the West Coast. His cousin will accompany him across the country, driving the RV and preparing the meals while he hits the golf ball.

Once Bielawski starts swinging mostly 6 and 7 irons, he will be playing the ball as it lies, hitting through fields, desert and wildness. In addition to raising money for the youngsters and meeting people from different parts of the country, Bielawski said he is looking forward to seeing the wildlife and landscapes of the west, southwest and southeastern United States.

“One of the best parts of the game is the scenery,” he said.

He hopes to make his final shot into the Atlantic Ocean on Aug. 5 and then return to Indiana for the start of classes Aug. 25.

The students at Providence Cristo Rey will be able to follow his trek across the lower half of the U.S. through Bielawski’s website and blog posts. They have never met the golf enthusiast but several share a common experience of working in the law. As part of the curriculum at the high school, the students participate in a work-study program. Currently 19 students are handling office duties such as filing and data entry at Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Bingham Greenebaum Doll LLP, Doyle Legal Corp., Faegre Baker Daniels LLP, Frost Brown Todd LLC and Ice Miller LLP.

Bielawski’s summer plans do not call for a complete break from the study of law. After a day of hitting, Bielawski will sit down at the computer to take a couple of online legal classes in preparation for his final semester in law school and graduation in December.

He is uncertain about what he will do after graduation, but, undoubtedly, when a potential employer asks him if he plays golf, Bielawski will have an amazing story to tell.

More information about Bielawski and “From Tee to Shining Tee” can be found at his website, www.getonthegreen.org.•

ADVERTISEMENT

  • 4-fourrrrr
    Proud to know you ,and that your making a mark in the world,in this case divit across the united states, all I cab say is wow and 4-fourrrr. Luke good luck

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Actually, and most strikingly, the ruling failed to address the central issue to the whole case: Namely, Black Knight/LPS, who was NEVER a party to the State court litigation, and who is under a 2013 consent judgment in Indiana (where it has stipulated to the forgery of loan documents, the ones specifically at issue in my case)never disclosed itself in State court or remediated the forged loan documents as was REQUIRED of them by the CJ. In essence, what the court is willfully ignoring, is that it is setting a precedent that the supplier of a defective product, one whom is under a consent judgment stipulating to such, and under obligation to remediate said defective product, can: 1.) Ignore the CJ 2.) Allow counsel to commit fraud on the state court 3.) Then try to hide behind Rooker Feldman doctrine as a bar to being held culpable in federal court. The problem here is the court is in direct conflict with its own ruling(s) in Johnson v. Pushpin Holdings & Iqbal- 780 F.3d 728, at 730 “What Johnson adds - what the defendants in this suit have failed to appreciate—is that federal courts retain jurisdiction to award damages for fraud that imposes extrajudicial injury. The Supreme Court drew that very line in Exxon Mobil ... Iqbal alleges that the defendants conducted a racketeering enterprise that predates the state court’s judgments ...but Exxon Mobil shows that the Rooker Feldman doctrine asks what injury the plaintiff asks the federal court to redress, not whether the injury is “intertwined” with something else …Because Iqbal seeks damages for activity that (he alleges) predates the state litigation and caused injury independently of it, the Rooker-Feldman doctrine does not block this suit. It must be reinstated.” So, as I already noted to others, I now have the chance to bring my case to SCOTUS; the ruling by Wood & Posner is flawed on numerous levels,BUT most troubling is the fact that the authors KNOW it's a flawed ruling and choose to ignore the flaws for one simple reason: The courts have decided to agree with former AG Eric Holder that national banks "Are too big to fail" and must win at any cost-even that of due process, case precedent, & the truth....Let's see if SCOTUS wants a bite at the apple.

  2. I am in NJ & just found out that there is a judgment against me in an action by Driver's Solutions LLC in IN. I was never served with any Court pleadings, etc. and the only thing that I can find out is that they were using an old Staten Island NY address for me. I have been in NJ for over 20 years and cannot get any response from Drivers Solutions in IN. They have a different lawyer now. I need to get this vacated or stopped - it is now almost double & at 18%. Any help would be appreciated. Thank you.

  3. I am in NJ & just found out that there is a judgment against me in an action by Driver's Solutions LLC in IN. I was never served with any Court pleadings, etc. and the only thing that I can find out is that they were using an old Staten Island NY address for me. I have been in NJ for over 20 years and cannot get any response from Drivers Solutions in IN. They have a different lawyer now. I need to get this vacated or stopped - it is now almost double & at 18%. Any help would be appreciated. Thank you.

  4. Please I need help with my class action lawsuits, im currently in pro-se and im having hard time findiNG A LAWYER TO ASSIST ME

  5. Access to the court (judiciary branch of government) is the REAL problem, NOT necessarily lack of access to an attorney. Unfortunately, I've lived in a legal and financial hell for the past six years due to a divorce (where I was, supposedly, represented by an attorney) in which I was defrauded of settlement and the other party (and helpers) enriched through the fraud. When I attempted to introduce evidence and testify (pro se) in a foreclosure/eviction, I was silenced (apparently on procedural grounds, as research I've done since indicates). I was thrown out of a residence which was to be sold, by a judge who refused to allow me to speak in (the supposedly "informal") small claims court where the eviction proceeding (by ex-brother-in-law) was held. Six years and I can't even get back on solid or stable ground ... having bank account seized twice, unlawfully ... and now, for the past year, being dragged into court - again, contrary to law and appellate decisions - by former attorney, who is trying to force payment from exempt funds. Friday will mark fifth appearance. Hopefully, I'll be allowed to speak. The situation I find myself in shouldn't even be possible, much less dragging out with no end in sight, for years. I've done nothing wrong, but am watching a lot of wrong being accomplished under court jurisdiction; only because I was married to someone who wanted and was granted a divorce (but was not willing to assume the responsibilities that come with granting the divorce). In fact, the recalcitrant party was enriched by well over $100k, although it was necessarily split with other actors. Pro bono help? It's a nice dream ... but that's all it is, for too many. Meanwhile, injustice marches on.

ADVERTISEMENT