ILNews

Jefferson County Courthouse reopens

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

More than two years after an accidental fire destroyed the Jefferson County Courthouse roof and heavily damaged the upper floor, those displaced by the fire have moved back into the landmark.

Several years ago, nearly $175,000 was spent renovating the courthouse, and on May 20, 2009, the day renovations to the courthouse were finished, smoke and flames were seen in that evening coming out of the courthouse roof. The fire was later ruled accidental, the result of contractors soldering copper downspouts and gutters on the roof.

The offices and courts were displaced, with the third floor suffering the most damage due to its proximity to the fire, but water damage was an issue throughout the building. Jefferson Circuit and Superior courts relocated into separate buildings in Madison, Ind. The records housed in the courthouse were backed up electronically up to the day of the fire, and many paper files were able to be saved through a freezing process and restoration.

The Circuit and Superior courts, clerk’s office, and the offices of the assessor, auditor, recorder, treasurer, county commissioners, and IT department began their move back into the restored courthouse the first week of August. Jefferson County Commissioner Julie Berry said the county used Department of Correction inmates from the Henryville Correctional Unit to move the offices from their temporary locations. The move was supervised by the county highway department and saved the county more than $20,000, she estimated. All offices are now up and running.

The outside will look nearly the same, as the courthouse is situated in downtown Madison, which is a historic district and has certain regulations for buildings in the area. But there were changes made inside, such as making the building more energy efficient and the incorporation of security measures. Because of the damage to the third floor, which houses the Circuit Court, officials were able to reconfigure the layout and convert the area designated for the library into a third courtroom.

Circuit Judge Ted Todd noted that thanks to computers, the courts don’t really need a library anymore. Now, the courts can utilize that space as a third courtroom when a senior judge comes onboard while Judge Todd is on a jury trial. It also allows Judge Todd to use the room when Superior Court needs a courtroom for a 12-person jury. The Superior Court, housed on the second floor, remains pretty much the same as before the fire as load-bearing walls prevented reconfiguration. That court only has a jury room big enough to handle a six-person jury.

The fire also uncovered hidden plaster molding in the Circuit courtroom. It was covered up by a lower ceiling, and officials hired a local craftsman to recreate what was missing, Berry said.

This would be the second time since the fire the Circuit Court has moved. They were in one office for two months just after the fire, and then moved into another location until the renovations were complete, said Judge Todd.

“We had a windowless room, it was sort of debilitating,” he said, noting how happy staff is to be back in the courthouse. “Everybody has a smile on their face and feeling good. It’s nice to be back.”

Now, officials will celebrate the reopening of the courthouse with a rededication ceremony Aug. 26. Berry said it will be a tribute to the volunteer fire departments that helped save the courthouse. Judge Todd and Superior Judge Alison Frazier will be on hand to speak, as well as Indiana Supreme Court Chief Justice Randall T. Shepard. There will be a ribbon-cutting ceremony to “open up” the courthouse.

Tours will be held Aug. 27, as well as an open house for those interested in seeing the renovated courthouse.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Just an aside, but regardless of the outcome, I 'm proud of Judge William Hughes. He was the original magistrate on the Home place issue. He ruled for Home Place, and was primaried by Brainard for it. Their tool Poindexter failed to unseat Hughes, who won support for his honesty and courage throughout the county, and he was reelected Judge of Hamilton County's Superior Court. You can still stand for something and survive. Thanks, Judge Hughes!

  2. CCHP's real accomplishment is the 2015 law signed by Gov Pence that basically outlaws any annexation that is forced where a 65% majority of landowners in the affected area disagree. Regardless of whether HP wins or loses, the citizens of Indiana will not have another fiasco like this. The law Gov Pence signed is a direct result of this malgovernance.

  3. I gave tempparry guardship to a friend of my granddaughter in 2012. I went to prison. I had custody. My daughter went to prison to. We are out. My daughter gave me custody but can get her back. She was not order to give me custody . but now we want granddaughter back from friend. She's 14 now. What rights do we have

  4. This sure is not what most who value good governance consider the Rule of Law to entail: "In a letter dated March 2, which Brizzi forwarded to IBJ, the commission dismissed the grievance “on grounds that there is not reasonable cause to believe that you are guilty of misconduct.”" Yet two month later reasonable cause does exist? (Or is the commission forging ahead, the need for reasonable belief be damned? -- A seeming violation of the Rules of Profession Ethics on the part of the commission) Could the rule of law theory cause one to believe that an explanation is in order? Could it be that Hoosier attorneys live under Imperial Law (which is also a t-word that rhymes with infamy) in which the Platonic guardians can do no wrong and never owe the plebeian class any explanation for their powerful actions. (Might makes it right?) Could this be a case of politics directing the commission, as celebrated IU Mauer Professor (the late) Patrick Baude warned was happening 20 years ago in his controversial (whisteblowing) ethics lecture on a quite similar topic: http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1498&context=ilj

  5. I have a case presently pending cert review before the SCOTUS that reveals just how Indiana regulates the bar. I have been denied licensure for life for holding the wrong views and questioning the grand inquisitors as to their duties as to state and federal constitutional due process. True story: https://www.scribd.com/doc/299040839/2016Petitionforcert-to-SCOTUS Shorter, Amici brief serving to frame issue as misuse of govt licensure: https://www.scribd.com/doc/312841269/Thomas-More-Society-Amicus-Brown-v-Ind-Bd-of-Law-Examiners

ADVERTISEMENT