ILNews

IBA: Jim Voyles - The Epitome of a Buchanan Award Recipient

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

buchanan-past-winnersThe Hon. Paul H. Buchanan, Jr. Award of Excellence is presented “from time to time”. It is intended to both reward the accomplishments of the recipient and to inspire others to such service. The award is given to member of the Indianapolis Bar Association whose attainments as a lawyer have been notable; whose contributions to the Association have been unique; and whose honorable service to the profession has extended over a significant period of time. James H. Voyles, Jr. of Voyles Zahn Paul Hogan & Merriman was determined to be a worthy recipient and by the comments made at a recent luncheon in his honor, he certainly epitomizes the lawyer deserving of such recognition.

Introduced during the program by Kevin McGoff, 2007 President of the Indianapolis Bar and a long-time friend, Voyles’ long service was highlighted. Serving first in 1979 as a member of then IndyBar President, Boyd Hovde’s executive committee, Voyles service has certainly extended over a significant period of time. Voyles has served in various board capacities with five other presidents over the years culminating in service as Indianapolis Bar Association President in 2009.

McGoff noted, “Beyond the formal roles Jim has filled, he has often made himself available behind the scenes. Sharing ideas, serving on committees, making contact with people he knows to further the interest of our profession are second nature to Jim. Even so, much of the time with only a few people were aware of his ongoing involvement.”

“When you want something done, you ask the busiest person in the room to tackle the project. Those who have worked with Jim, on cases or through the Bar know that this adage applies to him. No matter where he is; off in trial, out of town, or in the middle of a lake fishing Jim will likely return your call within 24 hours,” McGoff added.

Voyles’ achievements as a lawyer are notable. His client list is long and filled with high profile clients who have consistently entrusted their future in him. A nationally-known criminal defense attorney, Voyles currently serves on the board of the National Association of Criminal Defense Attorneys. He has devoted his career to defending people accused of serious crimes.

“In preparing to introduce Jim it struck me that his success as a lawyer, which has made him highly visible in the community, has put him in the position of having people from many walks of life scrutinize how this lawyer carries himself. The manner in which Jim has represented the profession and hence every lawyer in our legal community is notable and more significant than his success as a lawyer in his selection for the Buchanan Award,” McGoff said.

Voyles is also well known for treating opposing counsel with the same respect as he does his friends; sharing his humor and asking about their family all the while dogging them in doing his clients’ bidding.

McGoff summed up Voyles’ selection by saying, “Jim likes lawyers – clearly likes being a lawyer – even named his home, House of the Lawyer. But most importantly he carries himself in a way so that other people come away liking lawyers as well.”

Those representing the Indianapolis Bar Association on the Buchanan Award Selection Committee were Jeffrey Abrams, Christine Hickey, Martha S. Hollingsworth, The Hon. James S. Kirsch, Offer Korin, The Hon. Jane Magnus-Stinson, John R. Maley, The Hon. Victoria Ransberger, Dean Gary Roberts, Julie M. Armstrong, and Scott Olson of IBJ Media.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. The sad thing is that no fish were thrown overboard The "greenhorn" who had never fished before those 5 days was interrogated for over 4 hours by 5 officers until his statement was illicited, "I don't want to go to prison....." The truth is that these fish were measured frozen off shore and thawed on shore. The FWC (state) officer did not know fish shrink, so the only reason that these fish could be bigger was a swap. There is no difference between a 19 1/2 fish or 19 3/4 fish, short fish is short fish, the ticket was written. In addition the FWC officer testified at trial, he does not measure fish in accordance with federal law. There was a document prepared by the FWC expert that said yes, fish shrink and if these had been measured correctly they averaged over 20 inches (offshore frozen). This was a smoke and mirror prosecution.

  2. I love this, Dave! Many congrats to you! We've come a long way from studying for the bar together! :)

  3. This outbreak illustrates the absurdity of the extreme positions taken by today's liberalism, specifically individualism and the modern cult of endless personal "freedom." Ebola reminds us that at some point the person's own "freedom" to do this and that comes into contact with the needs of the common good and "freedom" must be curtailed. This is not rocket science, except, today there is nonstop propaganda elevating individual preferences over the common good, so some pundits have a hard time fathoming the obvious necessity of quarantine in some situations....or even NATIONAL BORDERS...propagandists have also amazingly used this as another chance to accuse Western nations of "racism" which is preposterous and offensive. So one the one hand the idolatry of individualism has to stop and on the other hand facts people don't like that intersect with race-- remain facts nonetheless. People who respond to facts over propaganda do better in the long run. We call it Truth. Sometimes it seems hard to find.

  4. It would be hard not to feel the Kramers' anguish. But Catholic Charities, by definition, performed due diligence and held to the statutory standard of care. No good can come from punishing them for doing their duty. Should Indiana wish to change its laws regarding adoption agreements and or putative fathers, the place for that is the legislature and can only apply to future cases. We do not apply new laws to past actions, as the Kramers seem intent on doing, to no helpful end.

  5. I am saddened to hear about the loss of Zeff Weiss. He was an outstanding member of the Indianapolis legal community. My thoughts are with his family.

ADVERTISEMENT