A federal judge in Indianapolis has found that a death row inmate is competent to assist his attorneys and proceed with a
five-year-old habeas appeal that's been stayed twice because of mental health concerns.
The ruling Tuesday from U.S. Judge Larry J. McKinney clears the way for habeas proceedings against condemned inmate Eric
Holmes, who was sentenced to die in 1992 by Special Judge Cynthia Emkes for the 1989 double murder and robbery of his former
managers at Shoney's Restaurant in Castleton.
After exhausting his appeals in state courts, Holmes in 2004 filed a habeas corpus petition in the Southern District of Indiana,
which denied the writ request that year. But Holmes appealed based on grounds that he wasn't competent, and the 7th Circuit
twice remanded the question to the trial level to determine that issue. The second remand was October 2007 and now Judge McKinney
has again determined Holmes is competent to proceed with the habeas appeal.
Citing other civil actions Holmes has filed and testimony he's given showing an understanding of his legal position,
as well as how Holmes' counsel hasn't outlined how the client would need to assist them, Judge McKinney determined
that Holmes "does not experience symptoms or cognitive condition which affect his ability to provide such assistance
to counsel as is necessary to enable the claim to habeas corpus relief to be prosecuted adequately by his counsel in the pending
appeal."














With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.
Jack, I was only responding to bill's comment of tying everybody in government together. I agree with you though, it takes one bad apple to ruin the bunch.. As in any profession. What's truly unfair is when somebody violates someone's trust and takes complete advantage of someone
John’s comment is unfair. The majority of attorneys can be trusted. Unfortunately, all it takes is one greedy, unscrupulous, immoral attorney to jade the public.
In regards to bill's comment about trusting the cover meant. We can trust them about as much as we can trust attorneys'.
This is disturbing to learn...