ILNews

Judge dismisses final MDL case

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Indiana Lawyer Rehearing

The final lawsuit in a multi-district litigation case involving Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) claims against Indiana-based Zimmer Holdings has been resolved, with U.S. Judge Sarah Evans Barker in the Southern District of Indiana dismissing with prejudice the suit against the company on Dec. 23.

Combined into the MDL case of Zimmer Holdings Inc. Securities, Derivative & ERISA, 1:09-MDL-06000, the litigation involved claims that Zimmer allowed participants in an employee investment plan to continue buying company stock even after quality and safety complaints about its orthopedic surgical products and hip resurfacing system impacted the company’s financial infrastructure and essentially led to artificially inflated stock prices that weren’t accurate based on the product issues.

Three cases were consolidated in the Southern District, and after Barker ruled on two suits, the only remaining case was Jonathan M. DeWald v. Zimmer Holdings, et al., No. 1:09-CV-00745.

Relying on precedent from the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals issued earlier in 2011 as the analytical template for this Zimmer Holdings case, Barker determined that the stock declines as alleged were insufficient to hold that the defendants acted imprudently. Specifically, she stated that each plan participant had several months to divert contributions into 28 other investment options. The Zimmer Holdings plan document established that the participants had independent control over their investments, so the judge determined the ERISA Section 404(c) safe harbor provision applies and bars the plaintiffs’ claim about failure to disclose. Barker also dismissed the plaintiffs’ failure to monitor and derivative claims regarding conflict of interest, co-fiduciary and liability issues.

An appeal is before the 7th Circuit on the two other cases, with a combined cause number of 11-1471.•

Rehearing "In the news, and onto the docket" IL Feb. 2-15, 2011

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. It's an appreciable step taken by the government to curb the child abuse that are happening in the schools. Employees in the schools those are selected without background check can not be trusted. A thorough background check on the teachers or any other other new employees must be performed to choose the best and quality people. Those who are already employed in the past should also be checked for best precaution. The future of kids can be saved through this simple process. However, the checking process should be conducted by the help of a trusted background checking agency(https://www.affordablebackgroundchecks.com/).

  2. Almost everything connects to internet these days. From your computers and Smartphones to wearable gadgets and smart refrigerators in your home, everything is linked to the Internet. Although this convenience empowers usto access our personal devices from anywhere in the world such as an IP camera, it also deprives control of our online privacy. Cyber criminals, hackers, spies and everyone else has realized that we don’t have complete control on who can access our personal data. We have to take steps to to protect it like keeping Senseless password. Dont leave privacy unprotected. Check out this article for more ways: https://www.purevpn.com/blog/data-privacy-in-the-age-of-internet-of-things/

  3. You need to look into Celadon not paying sign on bonuses. We call get the run

  4. My parents took advantage of the fact that I was homeless in 2012 and went to court and got Legal Guardianship I my 2 daughters. I am finally back on my feet and want them back, but now they want to fight me on it. I want to raise my children and have them almost all the time on the weekends. Mynparents are both almost 70 years old and they play favorites which bothers me a lot. Do I have a leg to stand on if I go to court to terminate lehal guardianship? My kids want to live with me and I want to raise them, this was supposed to be temporary, and now it is turning into a fight. Ridiculous

  5. Here's my two cents. While in Texas in 2007 I was not registered because I only had to do it for ten years. So imagine my surprise as I find myself forced to register in Texas because indiana can't get their head out of their butt long enough to realize they passed an ex post facto law in 2006. So because Indiana had me listed as a failure to register Texas said I had to do it there. Now if Indiana had done right by me all along I wouldn't need the aclu to defend my rights. But such is life.

ADVERTISEMENT