Even though a couple had originally filed their tax appeal within the 45-day deadline, the Indiana Tax Court still dismissed
their appeal because their reformatted documents and notice of intent to appeal weren't filed until after the deadline.
In E.L.
& B.L. Holsapple v. Monroe County Assessor, No. 49T10-0907, TA-33, the Holsapples wanted to appeal the final
determination by the Indiana Board of Tax Review regarding the real property assessment of their duplex, pole barn, and one
acre of land for the 2006 and 2007 tax years. The board issued its final determination May 8, 2009. The Holsapples, pro se,
filed a handwritten petition to appeal with the clerk's office June 22. The petition was returned two days later for reformatting.
The Holsapples resubmitted the documents July 3 and the clerk forwarded and mailed copies of the petition to the appropriate
parties.
The Monroe County Assessor moved to dismiss the appeal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because the petition wasn't
filed within 45 days. The Holsapples maintained the Tax Court should recognize the June 22 date as the date they filed and
consider the reformatted petition to be an amendment to that filing. They believed the letter they received from the clerk
requesting them to reformat their petition granted them a reasonable extension to file.
Even if Tax Court Judge Thomas Fisher assumed the reformatted petition relates back to June 22, the court still lacks jurisdiction
to hear the appeal because copies of the petitions weren't served nor was notice of intent to appeal filed with the Indiana
Board of Tax Review within the deadline, he wrote. As such, he granted the assessor's motion to dismiss.














vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.
Jack, I was only responding to bill's comment of tying everybody in government together. I agree with you though, it takes one bad apple to ruin the bunch.. As in any profession. What's truly unfair is when somebody violates someone's trust and takes complete advantage of someone
John’s comment is unfair. The majority of attorneys can be trusted. Unfortunately, all it takes is one greedy, unscrupulous, immoral attorney to jade the public.