ILNews

Judge rejects former prosecutor spokesman's plea

Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A Hamilton County judge has rejected the plea agreement of the former public information officer for Marion County Prosecutor Carl Brizzi.

Mario Massillamany was arrested in March in Hamilton County for drunk driving after he was stopped by police for speeding and driving in the wrong lane. Shortly after his arrest, Massillamany resigned from his position in the prosecutor’s office.

He is charged with two Class A misdemeanors: operating a vehicle while intoxicated endangering a person, and operating a vehicle with an alcohol concentration equivalent to 0.15 or more.

David Riggins of the Shelby County Prosecutor’s Office is the special prosecutor in the case due to Massillamany’s previous employment with the Hamilton County Prosecutor’s Office.

A jury trial was scheduled for Oct. 19, but Massillamany entered a guilty plea and agreement Thursday. Riggins said the agreement called for Massillamany to plead guilty to OWI endangering a person, do 150 hours of community service, have a 1-year sentence suspended to 20 days in jail, and have his license suspended for a year. His license is currently suspended.

Hamilton Superior Judge Gail Z. Bardach rejected the plea agreement and restored Massillamany’s not guilty plea. Riggins said the judge said in court she didn’t feel the license suspension was long enough.

The jury trial has been continued to Dec 7 but Riggins said they would continue to work on a plea agreement.

An attorney since 2004, he resigned his prosecutor’s office post immediately following his arrest and the Indiana Roll of Attorneys shows he’s now an attorney with Starr Austen & Miller in Logansport.

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by
2015 Distinguished Barrister &
Up and Coming Lawyer Reception

Tuesday, May 5, 2015 • 4:30 - 7:00 pm
Learn More


ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. by the time anybody gets to such files they will probably have been totally vacuumed anyways. they're pros at this at universities. anything to protect their incomes. Still, a laudable attempt. Let's go for throat though: how about the idea of unionizing football college football players so they can get a fair shake for their work? then if one of the players is a pain in the neck cut them loose instead of protecting them. if that kills the big programs, great, what do they have to do with learning anyways? nada. just another way for universities to rake in the billions even as they skate from paying taxes with their bogus "nonprofit" status.

  2. Um the affidavit from the lawyer is admissible, competent evidence of reasonableness itself. And anybody who had done law work in small claims court would not have blinked at that modest fee. Where do judges come up with this stuff? Somebody is showing a lack of experience and it wasn't the lawyers

  3. My children were taken away a year ago due to drugs, and u struggled to get things on track, and now that I have been passing drug screens for almost 6 months now and not missing visits they have already filed to take my rights away. I need help.....I can't loose my babies. Plz feel free to call if u can help. Sarah at 765-865-7589

  4. Females now rule over every appellate court in Indiana, and from the federal southern district, as well as at the head of many judicial agencies. Give me a break, ladies! Can we men organize guy-only clubs to tell our sob stories about being too sexy for our shirts and not being picked for appellate court openings? Nope, that would be sexist! Ah modernity, such a ball of confusion. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QmRsWdK0PRI

  5. LOL thanks Jennifer, thanks to me for reading, but not reading closely enough! I thought about it after posting and realized such is just what was reported. My bad. NOW ... how about reporting who the attorneys were raking in the Purdue alum dollars?

ADVERTISEMENT